Passing EPERM during syscall skipping was confusing since the test wasn't
actually exercising the errno evaluation -- it was just passing a literal
"1" (EPERM). Instead, expand the tests to check both direct value returns
(positive, 45000 in this case), and errno values (negative, -ESRCH in this
case) to check both fake success and fake failure during syscall skipping.
Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Fixes: a33b2d0359 ("selftests/seccomp: Add tests for basic ptrace actions")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
ed5f13261c