linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
Eduard Zingerman 1a4607ffba bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers
Tail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate
packet pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call
invalidates packet pointers.

Making the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes
use of check_cfg() logic that computes 'changes_pkt_data' effect for
global sub-programs, such that the following program could be
rejected:

    int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk)
    {
    	bpf_tail_call_static(sk, &jmp_table, 0);
    	return 0;
    }

    SEC("tc")
    int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk)
    {
    	int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data;
    	... make p valid ...
    	tail_call(sk);
    	*p = 42; /* this is unsafe */
    	...
    }

The tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that
can invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can't be freplaced with
tailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-8-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-12-10 10:24:57 -08:00

25 lines
449 B
C

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
#include "bpf_misc.h"
__noinline
int subprog_tc(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
int ret = 1;
__sink(skb);
__sink(ret);
/* let verifier know that 'subprog_tc' can change pointers to skb->data */
bpf_skb_change_proto(skb, 0, 0);
return ret;
}
SEC("tc")
int entry_tc(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
return subprog_tc(skb);
}
char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";