linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters_testmod_seq.c
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi bd74e238ae bpf: Zero index arg error string for dynptr and iter
Andrii spotted that process_dynptr_func's rejection of incorrect
argument register type will print an error string where argument numbers
are not zero-indexed, unlike elsewhere in the verifier.  Fix this by
subtracting 1 from regno. The same scenario exists for iterator
messages. Fix selftest error strings that match on the exact argument
number while we're at it to ensure clean bisection.

Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241203002235.3776418-1-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-12-02 18:47:41 -08:00

129 lines
2.9 KiB
C

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/* Copyright (c) 2023 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
#include "vmlinux.h"
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
#include "bpf_misc.h"
struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq {
u64 :64;
u64 :64;
};
extern int bpf_iter_testmod_seq_new(struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq *it, s64 value, int cnt) __ksym;
extern s64 *bpf_iter_testmod_seq_next(struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq *it) __ksym;
extern s64 bpf_iter_testmod_seq_value(int blah, struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq *it) __ksym;
extern void bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy(struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq *it) __ksym;
const volatile __s64 exp_empty = 0 + 1;
__s64 res_empty;
SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
__success __log_level(2)
__msg("fp-16_w=iter_testmod_seq(ref_id=1,state=active,depth=0)")
__msg("fp-16=iter_testmod_seq(ref_id=1,state=drained,depth=0)")
__msg("call bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy")
int testmod_seq_empty(const void *ctx)
{
__s64 sum = 0, *i;
bpf_for_each(testmod_seq, i, 1000, 0) sum += *i;
res_empty = 1 + sum;
return 0;
}
const volatile __s64 exp_full = 1000000;
__s64 res_full;
SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
__success __log_level(2)
__msg("fp-16_w=iter_testmod_seq(ref_id=1,state=active,depth=0)")
__msg("fp-16=iter_testmod_seq(ref_id=1,state=drained,depth=0)")
__msg("call bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy")
int testmod_seq_full(const void *ctx)
{
__s64 sum = 0, *i;
bpf_for_each(testmod_seq, i, 1000, 1000) sum += *i;
res_full = sum;
return 0;
}
const volatile __s64 exp_truncated = 10 * 1000000;
__s64 res_truncated;
static volatile int zero = 0;
SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
__success __log_level(2)
__msg("fp-16_w=iter_testmod_seq(ref_id=1,state=active,depth=0)")
__msg("fp-16=iter_testmod_seq(ref_id=1,state=drained,depth=0)")
__msg("call bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy")
int testmod_seq_truncated(const void *ctx)
{
__s64 sum = 0, *i;
int cnt = zero;
bpf_for_each(testmod_seq, i, 10, 2000000) {
sum += *i;
cnt++;
if (cnt >= 1000000)
break;
}
res_truncated = sum;
return 0;
}
SEC("?raw_tp")
__failure
__msg("expected an initialized iter_testmod_seq as arg #1")
int testmod_seq_getter_before_bad(const void *ctx)
{
struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq it;
return bpf_iter_testmod_seq_value(0, &it);
}
SEC("?raw_tp")
__failure
__msg("expected an initialized iter_testmod_seq as arg #1")
int testmod_seq_getter_after_bad(const void *ctx)
{
struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq it;
s64 sum = 0, *v;
bpf_iter_testmod_seq_new(&it, 100, 100);
while ((v = bpf_iter_testmod_seq_next(&it))) {
sum += *v;
}
bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy(&it);
return sum + bpf_iter_testmod_seq_value(0, &it);
}
SEC("?socket")
__success __retval(1000000)
int testmod_seq_getter_good(const void *ctx)
{
struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq it;
s64 sum = 0, *v;
bpf_iter_testmod_seq_new(&it, 100, 100);
while ((v = bpf_iter_testmod_seq_next(&it))) {
sum += *v;
}
sum *= bpf_iter_testmod_seq_value(0, &it);
bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy(&it);
return sum;
}
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";