mirror of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2025-08-05 16:54:27 +00:00
![]() The synchronization of CPU offlining with GP initialization is confusing to put it mildly (rightfully so as the issue it deals with is complex). Recent discussions brought up a question -- what prevents the rcu_implicit_dyntick_qs() from warning about QS reports for offline CPUs (missing QS reports for offline CPUs causing indefinite hangs). QS reporting for now-offline CPUs should only happen from: - gp_init() - rcutree_cpu_report_dead() Add some documentation on this and refer to it from comments in the code explaining how QS reporting is not missed when these functions are concurrently running. I referred heavily to this post [1] about the need for the ofl_lock. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20180924164443.GF4222@linux.ibm.com/ [ Applied paulmck feedback on moving documentation to Requirements.rst ] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/01b4d228-9416-43f8-a62e-124b92e8741a@paulmck-laptop/ Co-developed-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
Design | ||
checklist.rst | ||
index.rst | ||
listRCU.rst | ||
lockdep-splat.rst | ||
lockdep.rst | ||
NMI-RCU.rst | ||
rcu.rst | ||
rcu_dereference.rst | ||
rcubarrier.rst | ||
rculist_nulls.rst | ||
rcuref.rst | ||
RTFP.txt | ||
stallwarn.rst | ||
torture.rst | ||
UP.rst | ||
whatisRCU.rst |