test_global_func9 - check valid pointer's scenarios
test_global_func10 - check that a smaller type cannot be passed as a
larger one
test_global_func11 - check that CTX pointer cannot be passed
test_global_func12 - check access to a null pointer
test_global_func13 - check access to an arbitrary pointer value
test_global_func14 - check that an opaque pointer cannot be passed
test_global_func15 - check that a variable has an unknown value after
it was passed to a global function by pointer
test_global_func16 - check access to uninitialized stack memory
test_global_func_args - check read and write operations through a pointer
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Banshchikov <me@ubique.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210212205642.620788-5-me@ubique.spb.ru
Adding selftest for BPF-helper bpf_check_mtu(). Making sure
it can be used from both XDP and TC.
V16:
- Fix 'void' function definition
V11:
- Addresse nitpicks from Andrii Nakryiko
V10:
- Remove errno non-zero test in CHECK_ATTR()
- Addresse comments from Andrii Nakryiko
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/161287791989.790810.13612620012522164562.stgit@firesoul
This demonstrate how bpf_check_mtu() helper can easily be used together
with bpf_skb_adjust_room() helper, prior to doing size adjustment, as
delta argument is already setup.
Hint: This specific test can be selected like this:
./test_progs -t cls_redirect
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/161287791481.790810.4444271170546646080.stgit@firesoul
The test dumps information similar to /proc/pid/maps. The first line of
the output is compared against the /proc file to make sure they match.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210212183107.50963-4-songliubraving@fb.com
This patch adds a "void *owner" member. The existing
bpf_tcp_ca test will ensure the bpf_cubic.o and bpf_dctcp.o
can be loaded.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210212021037.267278-1-kafai@fb.com
This builds up on the existing socket cookie test which checks whether
the bpf_get_socket_cookie helpers provide the same value in
cgroup/connect6 and sockops programs for a socket created by the
userspace part of the test.
Instead of having an update_cookie sockops program tag a socket local
storage with 0xFF, this uses both an update_cookie_sockops program and
an update_cookie_tracing program which succesively tag the socket with
0x0F and then 0xF0.
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210111406.785541-5-revest@chromium.org
When migrating from the bpf.h's to the vmlinux.h's definition of struct
bps_sock, an interesting LLVM behavior happened. LLVM started producing
two fetches of ctx->sk in the sockops program this means that the
verifier could not keep track of the NULL-check on ctx->sk. Therefore,
we need to extract ctx->sk in a variable before checking and
dereferencing it.
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210111406.785541-4-revest@chromium.org
Currently, the selftest for the BPF socket_cookie helpers is built and
run independently from test_progs. It's easy to forget and hard to
maintain.
This patch moves the socket cookies test into prog_tests/ and vastly
simplifies its logic by:
- rewriting the loading code with BPF skeletons
- rewriting the server/client code with network helpers
- rewriting the cgroup code with test__join_cgroup
- rewriting the error handling code with CHECKs
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210111406.785541-3-revest@chromium.org
Add a basic test for map-in-map and per-cpu maps in sleepable programs.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210033634.62081-10-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Add recursive non-sleepable fentry program as a test.
All attach points where sleepable progs can execute are non recursive so far.
The recursion protection mechanism for sleepable cannot be activated yet.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210033634.62081-6-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Since both sleepable and non-sleepable programs execute under migrate_disable
add recursion prevention mechanism to both types of programs when they're
executed via bpf trampoline.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210033634.62081-5-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:954:28-30: WARNING !A || A &&
B is equivalent to !A || B.
./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:932:28-30: WARNING !A || A &&
B is equivalent to !A || B.
./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c:909:28-30: WARNING !A || A &&
B is equivalent to !A || B.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1612860398-102839-1-git-send-email-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com
Atomic tests store a DW, but then load it back as a W from the same
address. This doesn't work on big-endian systems, and since the point
of those tests is not testing narrow loads, fix simply by loading a
DW.
Fixes: 98d666d05a ("bpf: Add tests for new BPF atomic operations")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210020713.77911-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
The verifier errors around stack accesses have changed slightly in the
previous commit (generally for the better).
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210207011027.676572-3-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Instead of using shared global variables between userspace and BPF, use
the ring buffer to send the IMA hash on the BPF ring buffer. This helps
in validating both IMA and the usage of the ringbuffer in sleepable
programs.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210204193622.3367275-3-kpsingh@kernel.org
Add a short note to make contributors aware of the existence of the
script. The documentation does not intentionally document all the
options of the script to avoid mentioning it in two places (it's
available in the usage / help message of the script).
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210204194544.3383814-3-kpsingh@kernel.org
The script runs the BPF selftests locally on the same kernel image
as they would run post submit in the BPF continuous integration
framework.
The goal of the script is to allow contributors to run selftests locally
in the same environment to check if their changes would end up breaking
the BPF CI and reduce the back-and-forth between the maintainers and the
developers.
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210204194544.3383814-2-kpsingh@kernel.org
This patch adds support to verifier tests to check for a succession of
verifier log messages on program load failure. This makes the errstr
field work uniformly across REJECT and VERBOSE_ACCEPT checks.
This patch also increases the maximum size of a message in the series of
messages to test from 80 chars to 200 chars. This is in order to keep
existing tests working, which sometimes test for messages larger than 80
chars (which was accepted in the REJECT case, when testing for a single
message, but not in the VERBOSE_ACCEPT case, when testing for possibly
multiple messages).
And example of such a long, checked message is in bounds.c: "R1 has
unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds, pointer arithmetic with it
prohibited for !root"
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210130220150.59305-1-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Some compilers trigger a warning when tmp_dir_path is allocated
with a fixed size of 64-bytes and used in the following snprintf:
snprintf(tmp_exec_path, sizeof(tmp_exec_path), "%s/copy_of_rm",
tmp_dir_path);
warning: ‘/copy_of_rm’ directive output may be truncated writing 11
bytes into a region of size between 1 and 64 [-Wformat-truncation=]
This is because it assumes that tmp_dir_path can be a maximum of 64
bytes long and, therefore, the end-result can get truncated. Fix it by
not using a fixed size in the initialization of tmp_dir_path which
allows the compiler to track actual size of the array better.
Fixes: 2f94ac1918 ("bpf: Update local storage test to check handling of null ptrs")
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210202213730.1906931-1-kpsingh@kernel.org
When BPF_FETCH is set, atomic instructions load a value from memory
into a register. The current verifier code first checks via
check_mem_access whether we can access the memory, and then checks
via check_reg_arg whether we can write into the register.
For loads, check_reg_arg has the side-effect of marking the
register's value as unkonwn, and check_mem_access has the side effect
of propagating bounds from memory to the register. This currently only
takes effect for stack memory.
Therefore with the current order, bounds information is thrown away,
but by simply reversing the order of check_reg_arg
vs. check_mem_access, we can instead propagate bounds smartly.
A simple test is added with an infinite loop that can only be proved
unreachable if this propagation is present. This is implemented both
with C and directly in test_verifier using assembly.
Suggested-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210202135002.4024825-1-jackmanb@google.com
Those hooks run as BPF_CGROUP_RUN_SA_PROG_LOCK and operate on a locked socket.
Note that we could remove the switch for prog->expected_attach_type altogether
since all current sock_addr attach types are covered. However, it makes sense
to keep it as a safe-guard in case new sock_addr attach types are added that
might not operate on a locked socket. Therefore, avoid to let this slip through.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127232853.3753823-5-sdf@google.com
Can be used to query/modify socket state for unconnected UDP sendmsg.
Those hooks run as BPF_CGROUP_RUN_SA_PROG_LOCK and operate on
a locked socket.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127232853.3753823-2-sdf@google.com
When dealing with BPF/BTF/pahole and DWARF v5 I wanted to build bpftool.
While looking into the source code I found duplicate assignments in misc tools
for the LLVM eco system, e.g. clang and llvm-objcopy.
Move the Clang, LLC and/or LLVM utils definitions to tools/scripts/Makefile.include
file and add missing includes where needed. Honestly, I was inspired by the commit
c8a950d0d3 ("tools: Factor HOSTCC, HOSTLD, HOSTAR definitions").
I tested with bpftool and perf on Debian/testing AMD64 and LLVM/Clang v11.1.0-rc1.
Build instructions:
[ make and make-options ]
MAKE="make V=1"
MAKE_OPTS="HOSTCC=clang HOSTCXX=clang++ HOSTLD=ld.lld CC=clang LD=ld.lld LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1"
MAKE_OPTS="$MAKE_OPTS PAHOLE=/opt/pahole/bin/pahole"
[ clean-up ]
$MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/ clean
[ bpftool ]
$MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/bpf/bpftool/
[ perf ]
PYTHON=python3 $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/perf/
I was careful with respecting the user's wish to override custom compiler, linker,
GNU/binutils and/or LLVM utils settings.
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> # tools/build and tools/perf
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210128015117.20515-1-sedat.dilek@gmail.com
Return 3 to indicate that permission check for port 111
should be skipped.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127193140.3170382-2-sdf@google.com
Fix bug in handling bpf_testmod unloading that will cause test_progs exiting
prematurely if bpf_testmod unloading failed. This is especially problematic
when running a subset of test_progs that doesn't require root permissions and
doesn't rely on bpf_testmod, yet will fail immediately due to exit(1) in
unload_bpf_testmod().
Fixes: 9f7fa22589 ("selftests/bpf: Add bpf_testmod kernel module for testing")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210126065019.1268027-1-andrii@kernel.org
Let us use a local variable in nsswitchthread(), so we can remove a
lot of casting for better readability.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210122154725.22140-7-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
Instead of passing void * all over the place, let us pass the actual
type (ifobject) and remove the void-ptr-to-type-ptr casting.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210122154725.22140-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com
Add custom implementation of getsockopt hook for TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE.
We skip generic hooks for TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE and have a custom
call in do_tcp_getsockopt using the on-stack data. This removes
3% overhead for locking/unlocking the socket.
Without this patch:
3.38% 0.07% tcp_mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt
|
--3.30%--__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt
|
--0.81%--__kmalloc
With the patch applied:
0.52% 0.12% tcp_mmap [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt_kern
Note, exporting uapi/tcp.h requires removing netinet/tcp.h
from test_progs.h because those headers have confliciting
definitions.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210115163501.805133-2-sdf@google.com
llvm patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D84002 permitted
to emit empty rodata datasec if the elf .rodata section
contains read-only data from local variables. These
local variables will be not emitted as BTF_KIND_VARs
since llvm converted these local variables as
static variables with private linkage without debuginfo
types. Such an empty rodata datasec will make
skeleton code generation easy since for skeleton
a rodata struct will be generated if there is a
.rodata elf section. The existence of a rodata
btf datasec is also consistent with the existence
of a rodata map created by libbpf.
The btf with such an empty rodata datasec will fail
in the kernel though as kernel will reject a datasec
with zero vlen and zero size. For example, for the below code,
int sys_enter(void *ctx)
{
int fmt[6] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6};
int dst[6];
bpf_probe_read(dst, sizeof(dst), fmt);
return 0;
}
We got the below btf (bpftool btf dump ./test.o):
[1] PTR '(anon)' type_id=0
[2] FUNC_PROTO '(anon)' ret_type_id=3 vlen=1
'ctx' type_id=1
[3] INT 'int' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
[4] FUNC 'sys_enter' type_id=2 linkage=global
[5] INT 'char' size=1 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=8 encoding=SIGNED
[6] ARRAY '(anon)' type_id=5 index_type_id=7 nr_elems=4
[7] INT '__ARRAY_SIZE_TYPE__' size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=(none)
[8] VAR '_license' type_id=6, linkage=global-alloc
[9] DATASEC '.rodata' size=0 vlen=0
[10] DATASEC 'license' size=0 vlen=1
type_id=8 offset=0 size=4
When loading the ./test.o to the kernel with bpftool,
we see the following error:
libbpf: Error loading BTF: Invalid argument(22)
libbpf: magic: 0xeb9f
...
[6] ARRAY (anon) type_id=5 index_type_id=7 nr_elems=4
[7] INT __ARRAY_SIZE_TYPE__ size=4 bits_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=(none)
[8] VAR _license type_id=6 linkage=1
[9] DATASEC .rodata size=24 vlen=0 vlen == 0
libbpf: Error loading .BTF into kernel: -22. BTF is optional, ignoring.
Basically, libbpf changed .rodata datasec size to 24 since elf .rodata
section size is 24. The kernel then rejected the BTF since vlen = 0.
Note that the above kernel verifier failure can be worked around with
changing local variable "fmt" to a static or global, optionally const, variable.
This patch permits a datasec with vlen = 0 in kernel.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210119153519.3901963-1-yhs@fb.com
Reuse module_attach infrastructure to add a new bare tracepoint to check
we can attach to it as a raw tracepoint.
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210119122237.2426878-3-qais.yousef@arm.com
There are 3 tests added into verifier's jit tests to trigger x64
jit jump padding.
The first test can be represented as the following assembly code:
1: bpf_call bpf_get_prandom_u32
2: if r0 == 1 goto pc+128
3: if r0 == 2 goto pc+128
...
129: if r0 == 128 goto pc+128
130: goto pc+128
131: goto pc+127
...
256: goto pc+2
257: goto pc+1
258: r0 = 1
259: ret
We first store a random number to r0 and add the corresponding
conditional jumps (2~129) to make verifier believe that those jump
instructions from 130 to 257 are reachable. When the program is sent to
x64 jit, it starts to optimize out the NOP jumps backwards from 257.
Since there are 128 such jumps, the program easily reaches 15 passes and
triggers jump padding.
Here is the x64 jit code of the first test:
0: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0]
5: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
7: 55 push rbp
8: 48 89 e5 mov rbp,rsp
b: e8 4c 90 75 e3 call 0xffffffffe375905c
10: 48 83 f8 01 cmp rax,0x1
14: 0f 84 fe 04 00 00 je 0x518
1a: 48 83 f8 02 cmp rax,0x2
1e: 0f 84 f9 04 00 00 je 0x51d
...
f6: 48 83 f8 18 cmp rax,0x18
fa: 0f 84 8b 04 00 00 je 0x58b
100: 48 83 f8 19 cmp rax,0x19
104: 0f 84 86 04 00 00 je 0x590
10a: 48 83 f8 1a cmp rax,0x1a
10e: 0f 84 81 04 00 00 je 0x595
...
500: 0f 84 83 01 00 00 je 0x689
506: 48 81 f8 80 00 00 00 cmp rax,0x80
50d: 0f 84 76 01 00 00 je 0x689
513: e9 71 01 00 00 jmp 0x689
518: e9 6c 01 00 00 jmp 0x689
...
5fe: e9 86 00 00 00 jmp 0x689
603: e9 81 00 00 00 jmp 0x689
608: 0f 1f 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax]
60b: eb 7c jmp 0x689
60d: eb 7a jmp 0x689
...
683: eb 04 jmp 0x689
685: eb 02 jmp 0x689
687: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
689: b8 01 00 00 00 mov eax,0x1
68e: c9 leave
68f: c3 ret
As expected, a 3 bytes NOPs is inserted at 608 due to the transition
from imm32 jmp to imm8 jmp. A 2 bytes NOPs is also inserted at 687 to
replace a NOP jump.
The second test case is tricky. Here is the assembly code:
1: bpf_call bpf_get_prandom_u32
2: if r0 == 1 goto pc+2048
3: if r0 == 2 goto pc+2048
...
2049: if r0 == 2048 goto pc+2048
2050: goto pc+2048
2051: goto pc+16
2052: goto pc+15
...
2064: goto pc+3
2065: goto pc+2
2066: goto pc+1
...
[repeat "goto pc+16".."goto pc+1" 127 times]
...
4099: r0 = 2
4100: ret
There are 4 major parts of the program.
1) 1~2049: Those are instructions to make 2050~4098 reachable. Some of
them also could generate the padding for jmp_cond.
2) 2050: This is the target instruction for the imm32 nop jmp padding.
3) 2051~4098: The repeated "goto 1~16" instructions are designed to be
consumed by the nop jmp optimization. In the end, those
instrucitons become 128 continuous 0 offset jmp and are
optimized out in 1 pass, and this make insn 2050 an imm32
nop jmp in the next pass, so that we can trigger the
5 bytes padding.
4) 4099~4100: Those are the instructions to end the program.
The x64 jit code is like this:
0: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0]
5: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
7: 55 push rbp
8: 48 89 e5 mov rbp,rsp
b: e8 bc 7b d5 d3 call 0xffffffffd3d57bcc
10: 48 83 f8 01 cmp rax,0x1
14: 0f 84 7e 66 00 00 je 0x6698
1a: 48 83 f8 02 cmp rax,0x2
1e: 0f 84 74 66 00 00 je 0x6698
24: 48 83 f8 03 cmp rax,0x3
28: 0f 84 6a 66 00 00 je 0x6698
2e: 48 83 f8 04 cmp rax,0x4
32: 0f 84 60 66 00 00 je 0x6698
38: 48 83 f8 05 cmp rax,0x5
3c: 0f 84 56 66 00 00 je 0x6698
42: 48 83 f8 06 cmp rax,0x6
46: 0f 84 4c 66 00 00 je 0x6698
...
666c: 48 81 f8 fe 07 00 00 cmp rax,0x7fe
6673: 0f 1f 40 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+0x0]
6677: 74 1f je 0x6698
6679: 48 81 f8 ff 07 00 00 cmp rax,0x7ff
6680: 0f 1f 40 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+0x0]
6684: 74 12 je 0x6698
6686: 48 81 f8 00 08 00 00 cmp rax,0x800
668d: 0f 1f 40 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+0x0]
6691: 74 05 je 0x6698
6693: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0]
6698: b8 02 00 00 00 mov eax,0x2
669d: c9 leave
669e: c3 ret
Since insn 2051~4098 are optimized out right before the padding pass,
there are several conditional jumps from the first part are replaced with
imm8 jmp_cond, and this triggers the 4 bytes padding, for example at
6673, 6680, and 668d. On the other hand, Insn 2050 is replaced with the
5 bytes nops at 6693.
The third test is to invoke the first and second tests as subprogs to test
bpf2bpf. Per the system log, there was one more jit happened with only
one pass and the same jit code was produced.
v4:
- Add the second test case which triggers jmp_cond padding and imm32 nop
jmp padding.
- Add the new test case as another subprog
Signed-off-by: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210119102501.511-4-glin@suse.com
