Depending on kernel parameters, x86 jit generates either retq or jump
to rethunk for 'exit' instruction. The difference could be seen when
kernel is booted with and without mitigations=off parameter.
Relax the verifier_tailcall_jit test case to match both variants.
Fixes: e5bdd6a8be ("selftests/bpf: validate jit behaviour for tail calls")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240823080644.263943-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
A program calling sub-program which does a tail call.
The idea is to verify instructions generated by jit for tail calls:
- in program and sub-program prologues;
- for subprogram call instruction;
- for tail call itself.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240820102357.3372779-9-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
