There are 43 instances of posix shell tests and 35 instances of bash. To
give us a single consistent language for testing in, replace
all #!/bin/sh to #!/bin/bash. Common sources that are included in both
different shells will now work as expected. And we no longer have to fix
up bashisms that appear to work when someone's system has sh symlinked
to bash, but don't work on other systems that have both shells
installed.
Although we could have chosen sh, it's not backwards compatible so it
wouldn't be possible to bulk convert without re-writing the existing
bash tests.
Choosing bash also gives us some nicer features including 'local'
variable definitions and regexes in if statements that are already
widely used in the tests.
It's not expected that there are any users with only sh available due to
the large number of bash tests that exist.
Discussed in relation to running shellcheck here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/e3751a74be34bbf3781c4644f518702a7270220b.1749785642.git.collin.funk1@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Collin Funk <collin.funk1@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250623-james-perf-bash-tests-v1-1-f572f54d4559@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
I found it failed on machines with limited memory because 16M byte
per-cpu buffer is too big. The reason it added the option is not to
miss tracing data. Thus we can limit the data size by reducing the
function call depth instead of increasing the buffer size to handle the
whole data.
As it used the same option in the test_ftrace_trace() and it was able
to find the sleep function, it should work with the profile subcommand.
Get rid of other grep commands which might be affected by the depth
change.
Reported-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250107224352.1128669-3-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
On s390 the perf test case ftrace sometimes fails as follows:
# ./perf test ftrace
79: perf ftrace tests : FAILED!
#
The failure depends on the kernel .config file. Some configurations
always work fine, some do not. The ftrace profile test mostly fails,
because the ring buffer was not large enough, and some lines
(especially the interesting ones with nanosleep in it) where dropped.
To achieve success for all tested kernel configurations, enlarge
the buffer to store the traces completely without wrapping.
The default buffer size is too small for all kernel configurations.
Set the buffer size of for the ftrace profile test to 16 MB.
Output after:
# ./perf test ftrace
79: perf ftrace tests : Ok
#
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: agordeev@linux.ibm.com
Cc: gor@linux.ibm.com
Cc: hca@linux.ibm.com
Cc: sumanthk@linux.ibm.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119064856.641446-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com
Suggested-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
During the parallel testing, I've noticed some ftrace test failures. It
seems the regex pattern checks 100 msec of nanosleep with the error
range of 10 msec. But sometimes it's affected by other processes and
resulted in more time in the syscall.
The following output shows that it took more than 120 msec and failed.
Let's update the regex pattern so that it can allow more drifts.
perf ftrace profile test
# Total (us) Avg (us) Max (us) Count Function
121279.500 121279.500 121279.500 1 __x64_sys_clock_nanosleep
121278.400 121278.400 121278.400 1 common_nsleep
121277.800 121277.800 121277.800 1 hrtimer_nanosleep
121277.100 121277.100 121277.100 1 do_nanosleep
341760.289 56960.048 121273.400 6 schedule
176.200 25.171 31.616 7 scheduler_tick
0.923 0.923 0.923 1 native_smp_send_reschedule
345522.360 69104.472 345320.600 5 __x64_sys_execve
345486.585 69097.317 345312.700 5 do_execveat_common.isra.0
340730.300 340730.300 340730.300 1 bprm_execve
1.758 0.879 0.883 2 sched_mm_cid_before_execve
1.112 1.112 1.112 1 sched_mm_cid_after_execve
---- end(-1) ----
81: perf ftrace tests : FAILED!
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241102231702.2262258-1-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
In 'perf ftrace profile sleep 0.1' we know that we'll have an specific
kernel function that will take a bit more than 0.1 seconds and will take
place just one time, so we can add a check for that so that we validate
more than just the presence of some functions in the profile.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZrTBo7KACZeuCyLj@x1
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
