The name `zeroed` is a much better fit for a function that returns the
type by-value.
Link: 7dbe38682c
[ also rename uses in `rust/kernel/init.rs` - Benno]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250523145125.523275-2-lossin@kernel.org
[ Fix wrong replacement of `mem::zeroed` in the definition of `trait
Zeroable`. - Benno ]
[ Also change occurrences of `zeroed` in `configfs.rs` - Benno ]
Acked-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org>
This derive macro implements `Zeroable` for structs & unions precisely
if all fields also implement `Zeroable` and does nothing otherwise. The
plain `Zeroable` derive macro instead errors when it cannot derive
`Zeroable` safely. The `MaybeZeroable` derive macro is useful in cases
where manual checking is infeasible such as with the bindings crate.
Move the zeroable generics parsing into a standalone function in order
to avoid code duplication between the two derive macros.
Link: 1165cdad1a
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Enabling the same behavior for unions as for structs is correct, but
could be relaxed: the valid bit patterns for unions are the union of all
valid bit patterns of their fields. So for a union to implement
`Zeroable`, only a single field needs to implement `Zeroable`. This can
be a future improvement, as it is currently only needed for unions where
all fields implement `Zeroable`.
There is no danger for mis-parsing with the two optional tokens (ie
neither one or both tokens are parsed), as the compiler will already
have rejected that before giving it as the input to the derive macro.
Link: 5927b497ce
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Add support for parsing `pub`, `pub(crate)` and `pub(super)` to the
derive macro `Zeroable`.
Link: e8311e52ca
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Synchronize documentation and examples with the user-space version.
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@kloenk.dev>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308110339.2997091-18-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Rename relative paths inside of the crate to still refer to the same
items, also rename paths inside of the kernel crate and adjust the build
system to build the crate.
[ Remove the `expect` (and thus the `lint_reasons` feature) since
the tree now uses `quote!` from `rust/macros/export.rs`. Remove the
`TokenStream` import removal, since it is now used as well.
In addition, temporarily (i.e. just for this commit) use an `--extern
force:alloc` to prevent an unknown `new_uninit` error in the `rustdoc`
target. For context, please see a similar case in:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240422090644.525520-1-ojeda@kernel.org/
And adjusted the message above. - Miguel ]
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@kloenk.dev>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308110339.2997091-16-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Change the paste macro path from `::kernel::macros::paste!` to use
`$crate::init::macros::paste!` instead, which links to
`::macros::paste!`. This is because the pin-init crate will be a
dependency of the kernel, so it itself cannot have the kernel as a
dependency.
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@kloenk.dev>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308110339.2997091-14-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
In preparation of splitting off the pin-init crate from the kernel
crate, move all pin-init API code (including proc-macros) into
`rust/pin-init`.
Moved modules have their import path adjusted via the `#[path = "..."]`
attribute. This allows the files to still be imported in the kernel
crate even though the files are in different directories.
Code that is moved out of files (but the file itself stays where it is)
is imported via the `include!` macro. This also allows the code to be
moved while still being part of the kernel crate.
Note that this commit moves the generics parsing code out of the GPL-2.0
file `rust/macros/helpers.rs` into the Apache-2.0 OR MIT file
`rust/pin_init/internal/src/helpers.rs`. I am the sole author of that
code and it already is available with that license at [1].
The same is true for the entry-points of the proc-macros `pin_data`,
`pinned_drop` and `derive_zeroable` in `rust/macros/lib.rs` that are
moved to `rust/pin_data/internal/src/lib.rs`. Although there are some
smaller patches that fix the doctests.
Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pinned-init [1]
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@kloenk.dev>
Tested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308110339.2997091-3-benno.lossin@proton.me
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2025-03-16 21:59:18 +01:00
Renamed from rust/kernel/init/macros.rs (Browse further)
