We've already had two "error during ctx access conversion" warnings
triggered by syzkaller. Let's improve the error message by dumping the
cnt variable so that we can more easily differentiate between the
different error cases.
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cc94316c30dd76fae4a75a664b61a2dbfe68e205.1754039605.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Show the rejected function name when attaching tracing programs to
functions in deny list.
With this change, we know why tracing programs can't attach to functions
like __rcu_read_lock() from log.
$ ./fentry
libbpf: prog '__rcu_read_lock': BPF program load failed: -EINVAL
libbpf: prog '__rcu_read_lock': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
Attaching tracing programs to function '__rcu_read_lock' is rejected.
Suggested-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250724151454.499040-3-kafai.wan@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
With this change, we know the precise rejected function name when
attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn functions from log.
$ ./fexit
libbpf: prog 'fexit': BPF program load failed: -EINVAL
libbpf: prog 'fexit': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
Attaching fexit/fmod_ret to __noreturn function 'do_exit' is rejected.
Suggested-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250724151454.499040-2-kafai.wan@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Commit d7f0087381 ("bpf: try harder to deduce register bounds from
different numeric domains") added a second call to __reg_deduce_bounds
in reg_bounds_sync because a single call wasn't enough to converge to a
fixed point in terms of register bounds.
With patch "bpf: Improve bounds when s64 crosses sign boundary" from
this series, Eduard noticed that calling __reg_deduce_bounds twice isn't
enough anymore to converge. The first selftest added in "selftests/bpf:
Test cross-sign 64bits range refinement" highlights the need for a third
call to __reg_deduce_bounds. After instruction 7, reg_bounds_sync
performs the following bounds deduction:
reg_bounds_sync entry: scalar(smin=-655,smax=0xeffffeee,smin32=-783,smax32=-146)
__update_reg_bounds: scalar(smin=-655,smax=0xeffffeee,smin32=-783,smax32=-146)
__reg_deduce_bounds:
__reg32_deduce_bounds: scalar(smin=-655,smax=0xeffffeee,smin32=-783,smax32=-146,umin32=0xfffffcf1,umax32=0xffffff6e)
__reg64_deduce_bounds: scalar(smin=-655,smax=0xeffffeee,smin32=-783,smax32=-146,umin32=0xfffffcf1,umax32=0xffffff6e)
__reg_deduce_mixed_bounds: scalar(smin=-655,smax=0xeffffeee,umin=umin32=0xfffffcf1,umax=0xffffffffffffff6e,smin32=-783,smax32=-146,umax32=0xffffff6e)
__reg_deduce_bounds:
__reg32_deduce_bounds: scalar(smin=-655,smax=0xeffffeee,umin=umin32=0xfffffcf1,umax=0xffffffffffffff6e,smin32=-783,smax32=-146,umax32=0xffffff6e)
__reg64_deduce_bounds: scalar(smin=-655,smax=smax32=-146,umin=0xfffffffffffffd71,umax=0xffffffffffffff6e,smin32=-783,umin32=0xfffffcf1,umax32=0xffffff6e)
__reg_deduce_mixed_bounds: scalar(smin=-655,smax=smax32=-146,umin=0xfffffffffffffd71,umax=0xffffffffffffff6e,smin32=-783,umin32=0xfffffcf1,umax32=0xffffff6e)
__reg_bound_offset: scalar(smin=-655,smax=smax32=-146,umin=0xfffffffffffffd71,umax=0xffffffffffffff6e,smin32=-783,umin32=0xfffffcf1,umax32=0xffffff6e,var_off=(0xfffffffffffffc00; 0x3ff))
__update_reg_bounds: scalar(smin=-655,smax=smax32=-146,umin=0xfffffffffffffd71,umax=0xffffffffffffff6e,smin32=-783,umin32=0xfffffcf1,umax32=0xffffff6e,var_off=(0xfffffffffffffc00; 0x3ff))
In particular, notice how:
1. In the first call to __reg_deduce_bounds, __reg32_deduce_bounds
learns new u32 bounds.
2. __reg64_deduce_bounds is unable to improve bounds at this point.
3. __reg_deduce_mixed_bounds derives new u64 bounds from the u32 bounds.
4. In the second call to __reg_deduce_bounds, __reg64_deduce_bounds
improves the smax and umin bounds thanks to patch "bpf: Improve
bounds when s64 crosses sign boundary" from this series.
5. Subsequent functions are unable to improve the ranges further (only
tnums). Yet, a better smin32 bound could be learned from the smin
bound.
__reg32_deduce_bounds is able to improve smin32 from smin, but for that
we need a third call to __reg_deduce_bounds.
As discussed in [1], there may be a better way to organize the deduction
rules to learn the same information with less calls to the same
functions. Such an optimization requires further analysis and is
orthogonal to the present patchset.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/aIKtSK9LjQXB8FLY@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/79619d3b42e5525e0e174ed534b75879a5ba15de.1753695655.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
__reg64_deduce_bounds currently improves the s64 range using the u64
range and vice versa, but only if it doesn't cross the sign boundary.
This patch improves __reg64_deduce_bounds to cover the case where the
s64 range crosses the sign boundary but overlaps with the u64 range on
only one end. In that case, we can improve both ranges. Consider the
following example, with the s64 range crossing the sign boundary:
0 U64_MAX
| [xxxxxxxxxxxxxx u64 range xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] |
|----------------------------|----------------------------|
|xxxxx s64 range xxxxxxxxx] [xxxxxxx|
0 S64_MAX S64_MIN -1
The u64 range overlaps only with positive portion of the s64 range. We
can thus derive the following new s64 and u64 ranges.
0 U64_MAX
| [xxxxxx u64 range xxxxx] |
|----------------------------|----------------------------|
| [xxxxxx s64 range xxxxx] |
0 S64_MAX S64_MIN -1
The same logic can probably apply to the s32/u32 ranges, but this patch
doesn't implement that change.
In addition to the selftests, the __reg64_deduce_bounds change was
also tested with Agni, the formal verification tool for the range
analysis [1].
Link: https://github.com/bpfverif/agni [1]
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/933bd9ce1f36ded5559f92fdc09e5dbc823fa245.1753695655.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
During the bounds refinement, we improve the precision of various ranges
by looking at other ranges. Among others, we improve the following in
this order (other things happen between 1 and 2):
1. Improve u32 from s32 in __reg32_deduce_bounds.
2. Improve s/u64 from u32 in __reg_deduce_mixed_bounds.
3. Improve s/u64 from s32 in __reg_deduce_mixed_bounds.
In particular, if the s32 range forms a valid u32 range, we will use it
to improve the u32 range in __reg32_deduce_bounds. In
__reg_deduce_mixed_bounds, under the same condition, we will use the s32
range to improve the s/u64 ranges.
If at (1) we were able to learn from s32 to improve u32, we'll then be
able to use that in (2) to improve s/u64. Hence, as (3) happens under
the same precondition as (1), it won't improve s/u64 ranges further than
(1)+(2) did. Thus, we can get rid of (3).
In addition to the extensive suite of selftests for bounds refinement,
this patch was also tested with the Agni formal verification tool [1].
Additionally, Eduard mentioned:
The argument appears to be as follows:
Under precondition `(u32)reg->s32_min <= (u32)reg->s32_max`
__reg32_deduce_bounds produces:
reg->u32_min = max_t(u32, reg->s32_min, reg->u32_min);
reg->u32_max = min_t(u32, reg->s32_max, reg->u32_max);
And then first part of __reg_deduce_mixed_bounds assigns:
a. reg->umin umax= (reg->umin & ~0xffffffffULL) | max_t(u32, reg->s32_min, reg->u32_min);
b. reg->umax umin= (reg->umax & ~0xffffffffULL) | min_t(u32, reg->s32_max, reg->u32_max);
And then second part of __reg_deduce_mixed_bounds assigns:
c. reg->umin umax= (reg->umin & ~0xffffffffULL) | (u32)reg->s32_min;
d. reg->umax umin= (reg->umax & ~0xffffffffULL) | (u32)reg->s32_max;
But assignment (c) is a noop because:
max_t(u32, reg->s32_min, reg->u32_min) >= (u32)reg->s32_min
Hence RHS(a) >= RHS(c) and umin= does nothing.
Also assignment (d) is a noop because:
min_t(u32, reg->s32_max, reg->u32_max) <= (u32)reg->s32_max
Hence RHS(b) <= RHS(d) and umin= does nothing.
Plus the same reasoning for the part dealing with reg->s{min,max}_value:
e. reg->smin_value smax= (reg->smin_value & ~0xffffffffULL) | max_t(u32, reg->s32_min_value, reg->u32_min_value);
f. reg->smax_value smin= (reg->smax_value & ~0xffffffffULL) | min_t(u32, reg->s32_max_value, reg->u32_max_value);
vs
g. reg->smin_value smax= (reg->smin_value & ~0xffffffffULL) | (u32)reg->s32_min_value;
h. reg->smax_value smin= (reg->smax_value & ~0xffffffffULL) | (u32)reg->s32_max_value;
RHS(e) >= RHS(g) and RHS(f) <= RHS(h), hence smax=,smin= do nothing.
This appears to be correct.
Also, Shung-Hsi:
Beside going through the reasoning, I also played with CBMC a bit to
double check that as far as a single run of __reg_deduce_bounds() is
concerned (and that the register state matches certain handwavy
expectations), the change indeed still preserve the original behavior.
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://github.com/bpfverif/agni [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/aIJwnFnFyUjNsCNa@mail.gmail.com
Syzbot reported a kernel warning due to a range invariant violation on
the following BPF program.
0: call bpf_get_netns_cookie
1: if r0 == 0 goto <exit>
2: if r0 & Oxffffffff goto <exit>
The issue is on the path where we fall through both jumps.
That path is unreachable at runtime: after insn 1, we know r0 != 0, but
with the sign extension on the jset, we would only fallthrough insn 2
if r0 == 0. Unfortunately, is_branch_taken() isn't currently able to
figure this out, so the verifier walks all branches. The verifier then
refines the register bounds using the second condition and we end
up with inconsistent bounds on this unreachable path:
1: if r0 == 0 goto <exit>
r0: u64=[0x1, 0xffffffffffffffff] var_off=(0, 0xffffffffffffffff)
2: if r0 & 0xffffffff goto <exit>
r0 before reg_bounds_sync: u64=[0x1, 0xffffffffffffffff] var_off=(0, 0)
r0 after reg_bounds_sync: u64=[0x1, 0] var_off=(0, 0)
Improving the range refinement for JSET to cover all cases is tricky. We
also don't expect many users to rely on JSET given LLVM doesn't generate
those instructions. So instead of improving the range refinement for
JSETs, Eduard suggested we forget the ranges whenever we're narrowing
tnums after a JSET. This patch implements that approach.
Reported-by: syzbot+c711ce17dd78e5d4fdcf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9d4fd6432a095d281f815770608fdcd16028ce0b.1752171365.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
We must terminate the speculative analysis if the just-analyzed insn had
nospec_result set. Using cur_aux() here is wrong because insn_idx might
have been incremented by do_check_insn(). Therefore, introduce and use
insn_aux variable.
Also change cur_aux(env)->nospec in case do_check_insn() ever manages to
increment insn_idx but still fail.
Change the warning to check the insn class (which prevents it from
triggering for ldimm64, for which nospec_result would not be
problematic) and use verifier_bug_if().
In line with Eduard's suggestion, do not introduce prev_aux() because
that requires one to understand that after do_check_insn() call what was
current became previous. This would at-least require a comment.
Fixes: d6f1c85f22 ("bpf: Fall back to nospec for Spectre v1")
Reported-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+dc27c5fb8388e38d2d37@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/685b3c1b.050a0220.2303ee.0010.GAE@google.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/4266fd5de04092aa4971cbef14f1b4b96961f432.camel@gmail.com/
Suggested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250705190908.1756862-2-luis.gerhorst@fau.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Allow specifying __arg_untrusted for void */char */int */long *
parameters. Treat such parameters as
PTR_TO_MEM|MEM_RDONLY|PTR_UNTRUSTED of size zero.
Intended usage is as follows:
int memcmp(char *a __arg_untrusted, char *b __arg_untrusted, size_t n) {
bpf_for(i, 0, n) {
if (a[i] - b[i]) // load at any offset is allowed
return a[i] - b[i];
}
return 0;
}
Allocate register id for ARG_PTR_TO_MEM parameters only when
PTR_MAYBE_NULL is set. Register id for PTR_TO_MEM is used only to
propagate non-null status after conditionals.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250704230354.1323244-8-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add support for PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_UNTRUSTED global function
parameters. Anything is allowed to pass to such parameters, as these
are read-only and probe read instructions would protect against
invalid memory access.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250704230354.1323244-5-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When processing a load from a PTR_TO_BTF_ID, the verifier calculates
the type of the loaded structure field based on the load offset.
For example, given the following types:
struct foo {
struct foo *a;
int *b;
} *p;
The verifier would calculate the type of `p->a` as a pointer to
`struct foo`. However, the type of `p->b` is currently calculated as a
SCALAR_VALUE.
This commit updates the logic for processing PTR_TO_BTF_ID to instead
calculate the type of p->b as PTR_TO_MEM|MEM_RDONLY|PTR_UNTRUSTED.
This change allows further dereferencing of such pointers (using probe
memory instructions).
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250704230354.1323244-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Non-functional change:
mark_btf_ld_reg() expects 'reg_type' parameter to be either
SCALAR_VALUE or PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Next commit expands this set, so update
this function to fail if unexpected type is passed. Also update
callers to propagate the error.
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250704230354.1323244-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add a 'struct bpf_scc_callchain callchain_buf' field in bpf_verifier_env.
This way, the previous bpf_scc_callchain local variables can be
replaced by taking address of env->callchain_buf. This can reduce stack
usage and fix the following error:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19921:12: error: stack frame size (1368) exceeds limit (1280) in 'do_check'
[-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250703141117.1485108-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Arnd Bergmann reported an issue ([1]) where clang compiler (less than
llvm18) may trigger an error where the stack frame size exceeds the limit.
I can reproduce the error like below:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:24491:5: error: stack frame size (2552) exceeds limit (1280) in 'bpf_check'
[-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19921:12: error: stack frame size (1368) exceeds limit (1280) in 'do_check'
[-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than]
Use env->insn_buf for bpf insns instead of putting these insns on the
stack. This can resolve the above 'bpf_check' error. The 'do_check' error
will be resolved in the next patch.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250620113846.3950478-1-arnd@kernel.org/
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250703141111.1484521-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In verifier.c, the following code patterns (in two places)
struct bpf_insn *patch = &insn_buf[0];
can be simplified to
struct bpf_insn *patch = insn_buf;
which is easier to understand.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250703141106.1483216-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Before handling the tail call in record_func_key(), we check that the
map is of the expected type and log a verifier error if it isn't. Such
an error however doesn't indicate anything wrong with the verifier. The
check for map<>func compatibility is done after record_func_key(), by
check_map_func_compatibility().
Therefore, this patch logs the error as a typical reject instead of a
verifier error.
Fixes: d2e4c1e6c2 ("bpf: Constant map key tracking for prog array pokes")
Fixes: 0df1a55afa ("bpf: Warn on internal verifier errors")
Reported-by: syzbot+efb099d5833bca355e51@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1f395b74e73022e47e04a31735f258babf305420.1751578055.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add support for a stream API to the kernel and expose related kfuncs to
BPF programs. Two streams are exposed, BPF_STDOUT and BPF_STDERR. These
can be used for printing messages that can be consumed from user space,
thus it's similar in spirit to existing trace_pipe interface.
The kernel will use the BPF_STDERR stream to notify the program of any
errors encountered at runtime. BPF programs themselves may use both
streams for writing debug messages. BPF library-like code may use
BPF_STDERR to print warnings or errors on misuse at runtime.
The implementation of a stream is as follows. Everytime a message is
emitted from the kernel (directly, or through a BPF program), a record
is allocated by bump allocating from per-cpu region backed by a page
obtained using alloc_pages_nolock(). This ensures that we can allocate
memory from any context. The eventual plan is to discard this scheme in
favor of Alexei's kmalloc_nolock() [0].
This record is then locklessly inserted into a list (llist_add()) so
that the printing side doesn't require holding any locks, and works in
any context. Each stream has a maximum capacity of 4MB of text, and each
printed message is accounted against this limit.
Messages from a program are emitted using the bpf_stream_vprintk kfunc,
which takes a stream_id argument in addition to working otherwise
similar to bpf_trace_vprintk.
The bprintf buffer helpers are extracted out to be reused for printing
the string into them before copying it into the stream, so that we can
(with the defined max limit) format a string and know its true length
before performing allocations of the stream element.
For consuming elements from a stream, we expose a bpf(2) syscall command
named BPF_PROG_STREAM_READ_BY_FD, which allows reading data from the
stream of a given prog_fd into a user space buffer. The main logic is
implemented in bpf_stream_read(). The log messages are queued in
bpf_stream::log by the bpf_stream_vprintk kfunc, and then pulled and
ordered correctly in the stream backlog.
For this purpose, we hold a lock around bpf_stream_backlog_peek(), as
llist_del_first() (if we maintained a second lockless list for the
backlog) wouldn't be safe from multiple threads anyway. Then, if we
fail to find something in the backlog log, we splice out everything from
the lockless log, and place it in the backlog log, and then return the
head of the backlog. Once the full length of the element is consumed, we
will pop it and free it.
The lockless list bpf_stream::log is a LIFO stack. Elements obtained
using a llist_del_all() operation are in LIFO order, thus would break
the chronological ordering if printed directly. Hence, this batch of
messages is first reversed. Then, it is stashed into a separate list in
the stream, i.e. the backlog_log. The head of this list is the actual
message that should always be returned to the caller. All of this is
done in bpf_stream_backlog_fill().
From the kernel side, the writing into the stream will be a bit more
involved than the typical printk. First, the kernel typically may print
a collection of messages into the stream, and parallel writers into the
stream may suffer from interleaving of messages. To ensure each group of
messages is visible atomically, we can lift the advantage of using a
lockless list for pushing in messages.
To enable this, we add a bpf_stream_stage() macro, and require kernel
users to use bpf_stream_printk statements for the passed expression to
write into the stream. Underneath the macro, we have a message staging
API, where a bpf_stream_stage object on the stack accumulates the
messages being printed into a local llist_head, and then a commit
operation splices the whole batch into the stream's lockless log list.
This is especially pertinent for rqspinlock deadlock messages printed to
program streams. After this change, we see each deadlock invocation as a
non-interleaving contiguous message without any confusion on the
reader's part, improving their user experience in debugging the fault.
While programs cannot benefit from this staged stream writing API, they
could just as well hold an rqspinlock around their print statements to
serialize messages, hence this is kept kernel-internal for now.
Overall, this infrastructure provides NMI-safe any context printing of
messages to two dedicated streams.
Later patches will add support for printing splats in case of BPF arena
page faults, rqspinlock deadlocks, and cond_break timeouts, and
integration of this facility into bpftool for dumping messages to user
space.
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250501032718.65476-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250703204818.925464-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The description of full helper calls in syzkaller [1] and the addition of
kernel warnings in commit 0df1a55afa ("bpf: Warn on internal verifier
errors") allowed syzbot to reach a verifier state that was thought to
indicate a verifier bug [2]:
12: (85) call bpf_tcp_raw_gen_syncookie_ipv4#204
verifier bug: more than one arg with ref_obj_id R2 2 2
This error can be reproduced with the program from the previous commit:
0: (b7) r2 = 20
1: (b7) r3 = 0
2: (18) r1 = 0xffff92cee3cbc600
4: (85) call bpf_ringbuf_reserve#131
5: (55) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+3
6: (bf) r1 = r0
7: (bf) r2 = r0
8: (85) call bpf_tcp_raw_gen_syncookie_ipv4#204
9: (95) exit
bpf_tcp_raw_gen_syncookie_ipv4 expects R1 and R2 to be
ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM (with a size of at least sizeof(struct iphdr)
for R1). R0 is a ring buffer payload of 20B and therefore matches this
requirement.
The verifier reaches the check on ref_obj_id while verifying R2 and
rejects the program because the helper isn't supposed to take two
referenced arguments.
This case is a legitimate rejection and doesn't indicate a kernel bug,
so we shouldn't log it as such and shouldn't emit a kernel warning.
Link: https://github.com/google/syzkaller/pull/4313 [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/686491d6.a70a0220.3b7e22.20ea.GAE@google.com/T/ [2]
Fixes: 457f44363a ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Fixes: 0df1a55afa ("bpf: Warn on internal verifier errors")
Reported-by: syzbot+69014a227f8edad4d8c6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cd09afbfd7bef10bbc432d72693f78ffdc1e8ee5.1751463262.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Commit f2362a57ae ("bpf: allow void* cast using bpf_rdonly_cast()")
added a notion of PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY | PTR_UNTRUSTED type.
This simultaneously introduced a bug in jump prediction logic for
situations like below:
p = bpf_rdonly_cast(..., 0);
if (p) a(); else b();
Here verifier would wrongly predict that else branch cannot be taken.
This happens because:
- Function reg_not_null() assumes that PTR_TO_MEM w/o PTR_MAYBE_NULL
flag cannot be zero.
- The call to bpf_rdonly_cast() returns a rdonly_untrusted_mem value
w/o PTR_MAYBE_NULL flag.
Tracking of PTR_MAYBE_NULL flag for untrusted PTR_TO_MEM does not make
sense, as the main purpose of the flag is to catch null pointer access
errors. Such errors are not possible on load of PTR_UNTRUSTED values
and verifier makes sure that PTR_UNTRUSTED can't be passed to helpers
or kfuncs.
Hence, modify reg_not_null() to assume that nullness of untrusted
PTR_TO_MEM is not known.
Fixes: f2362a57ae ("bpf: allow void* cast using bpf_rdonly_cast()")
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250702073620.897517-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
This patch is a follow up to commit 1cb0f56d96 ("bpf: WARN_ONCE on
verifier bugs"). It generalizes the use of verifier_error throughout
the verifier, in particular for logs previously marked "verifier
internal error". As a consequence, all of those verifier bugs will now
come with a kernel warning (under CONFIG_DBEUG_KERNEL) detectable by
fuzzers.
While at it, some error messages that were too generic (ex., "bpf
verifier is misconfigured") have been reworded.
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/aGQqnzMyeagzgkCK@Tunnel
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cross-merge BPF, perf and other fixes after downstream PRs.
It restores BPF CI to green after critical fix
commit bc4394e5e7 ("perf: Fix the throttle error of some clock events")
No conflicts.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Introduce support for `bpf_rdonly_cast(v, 0)`, which casts the value
`v` to an untyped, untrusted pointer, logically similar to a `void *`.
The memory pointed to by such a pointer is treated as read-only.
As with other untrusted pointers, memory access violations on loads
return zero instead of causing a fault.
Technically:
- The resulting pointer is represented as a register of type
`PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY | PTR_UNTRUSTED` with size zero.
- Offsets within such pointers are not tracked.
- Same load instructions are allowed to have both
`PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY | PTR_UNTRUSTED` and `PTR_TO_BTF_ID`
as the base pointer types.
In such cases, `bpf_insn_aux_data->ptr_type` is considered the
weaker of the two: `PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY | PTR_UNTRUSTED`.
The following constraints apply to the new pointer type:
- can be used as a base for LDX instructions;
- can't be used as a base for ST/STX or atomic instructions;
- can't be used as parameter for kfuncs or helpers.
These constraints are enforced by existing handling of `MEM_RDONLY`
flag and `PTR_TO_MEM` of size zero.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250625182414.30659-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit adds a kernel side enum for use in conjucntion with BTF
CO-RE bpf_core_enum_value_exists. The goal of the enum is to assist
with available BPF features detection. Intended usage looks as
follows:
if (bpf_core_enum_value_exists(enum bpf_features, BPF_FEAT_<f>))
... use feature f ...
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250625182414.30659-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add range tracking for instruction BPF_NEG. Without this logic, a trivial
program like the following will fail
volatile bool found_value_b;
SEC("lsm.s/socket_connect")
int BPF_PROG(test_socket_connect)
{
if (!found_value_b)
return -1;
return 0;
}
with verifier log:
"At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=4294967295 should have
been in [-4095, 0]".
This is because range information is lost in BPF_NEG:
0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
; if (!found_value_b) @ xxxx.c:24
0: (18) r1 = 0xffa00000011e7048 ; R1_w=map_value(...)
2: (71) r0 = *(u8 *)(r1 +0) ; R0_w=scalar(smin32=0,smax=255)
3: (a4) w0 ^= 1 ; R0_w=scalar(smin32=0,smax=255)
4: (84) w0 = -w0 ; R0_w=scalar(range info lost)
Note that, the log above is manually modified to highlight relevant bits.
Fix this by maintaining proper range information with BPF_NEG, so that
the verifier will know:
4: (84) w0 = -w0 ; R0_w=scalar(smin32=-255,smax=0)
Also updated selftests based on the expected behavior.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250625164025.3310203-2-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch improves the precison of the scalar(32)_min_max_add and
scalar(32)_min_max_sub functions, which update the u(32)min/u(32)_max
ranges for the BPF_ADD and BPF_SUB instructions. We discovered this more
precise operator using a technique we are developing for automatically
synthesizing functions for updating tnums and ranges.
According to the BPF ISA [1], "Underflow and overflow are allowed during
arithmetic operations, meaning the 64-bit or 32-bit value will wrap".
Our patch leverages the wrap-around semantics of unsigned overflow and
underflow to improve precision.
Below is an example of our patch for scalar_min_max_add; the idea is
analogous for all four functions.
There are three cases to consider when adding two u64 ranges [dst_umin,
dst_umax] and [src_umin, src_umax]. Consider a value x in the range
[dst_umin, dst_umax] and another value y in the range [src_umin,
src_umax].
(a) No overflow: No addition x + y overflows. This occurs when even the
largest possible sum, i.e., dst_umax + src_umax <= U64_MAX.
(b) Partial overflow: Some additions x + y overflow. This occurs when
the largest possible sum overflows (dst_umax + src_umax > U64_MAX), but
the smallest possible sum does not overflow (dst_umin + src_umin <=
U64_MAX).
(c) Full overflow: All additions x + y overflow. This occurs when both
the smallest possible sum and the largest possible sum overflow, i.e.,
both (dst_umin + src_umin) and (dst_umax + src_umax) are > U64_MAX.
The current implementation conservatively sets the output bounds to
unbounded, i.e, [umin=0, umax=U64_MAX], whenever there is *any*
possibility of overflow, i.e, in cases (b) and (c). Otherwise it
computes tight bounds as [dst_umin + src_umin, dst_umax + src_umax]:
if (check_add_overflow(*dst_umin, src_reg->umin_value, dst_umin) ||
check_add_overflow(*dst_umax, src_reg->umax_value, dst_umax)) {
*dst_umin = 0;
*dst_umax = U64_MAX;
}
Our synthesis-based technique discovered a more precise operator.
Particularly, in case (c), all possible additions x + y overflow and
wrap around according to eBPF semantics, and the computation of the
output range as [dst_umin + src_umin, dst_umax + src_umax] continues to
work. Only in case (b), do we need to set the output bounds to
unbounded, i.e., [0, U64_MAX].
Case (b) can be checked by seeing if the minimum possible sum does *not*
overflow and the maximum possible sum *does* overflow, and when that
happens, we set the output to unbounded:
min_overflow = check_add_overflow(*dst_umin, src_reg->umin_value, dst_umin);
max_overflow = check_add_overflow(*dst_umax, src_reg->umax_value, dst_umax);
if (!min_overflow && max_overflow) {
*dst_umin = 0;
*dst_umax = U64_MAX;
}
Below is an example eBPF program and the corresponding log from the
verifier.
The current implementation of scalar_min_max_add() sets r3's bounds to
[0, U64_MAX] at instruction 5: (0f) r3 += r3, due to conservative
overflow handling.
0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
0: (b7) r4 = 0 ; R4_w=0
1: (87) r4 = -r4 ; R4_w=scalar()
2: (18) r3 = 0xa000000000000000 ; R3_w=0xa000000000000000
4: (4f) r3 |= r4 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=0xa000000000000000,smax=-1,umin=0xa000000000000000,var_off=(0xa000000000000000; 0x5fffffffffffffff)) R4_w=scalar()
5: (0f) r3 += r3 ; R3_w=scalar()
6: (b7) r0 = 1 ; R0_w=1
7: (95) exit
With our patch, r3's bounds after instruction 5 are set to a much more
precise [0x4000000000000000,0xfffffffffffffffe].
...
5: (0f) r3 += r3 ; R3_w=scalar(umin=0x4000000000000000,umax=0xfffffffffffffffe)
6: (b7) r0 = 1 ; R0_w=1
7: (95) exit
The logic for scalar32_min_max_add is analogous. For the
scalar(32)_min_max_sub functions, the reasoning is similar but applied
to detecting underflow instead of overflow.
We verified the correctness of the new implementations using Agni [3,4].
We since also discovered that a similar technique has been used to
calculate output ranges for unsigned interval addition and subtraction
in Hacker's Delight [2].
[1] https://docs.kernel.org/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.html
[2] Hacker's Delight Ch.4-2, Propagating Bounds through Add’s and Subtract’s
[3] https://github.com/bpfverif/agni
[4] https://people.cs.rutgers.edu/~sn349/papers/sas24-preprint.pdf
Co-developed-by: Matan Shachnai <m.shachnai@rutgers.edu>
Signed-off-by: Matan Shachnai <m.shachnai@rutgers.edu>
Co-developed-by: Srinivas Narayana <srinivas.narayana@rutgers.edu>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Narayana <srinivas.narayana@rutgers.edu>
Co-developed-by: Santosh Nagarakatte <santosh.nagarakatte@rutgers.edu>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Nagarakatte <santosh.nagarakatte@rutgers.edu>
Signed-off-by: Harishankar Vishwanathan <harishankar.vishwanathan@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250623040359.343235-2-harishankar.vishwanathan@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Mark struct cgroup_subsys_state->cgroup as safe under RCU read lock. This
will enable accessing css->cgroup from a bpf css iterator.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250623063854.1896364-4-song@kernel.org
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
LSM hooks such as security_path_mknod() and security_inode_rename() have
access to newly allocated negative dentry, which has NULL d_inode.
Therefore, it is necessary to do the NULL pointer check for d_inode.
Also add selftests that checks the verifier enforces the NULL pointer
check.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613052857.1992233-1-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This patch removes duplicated code.
Eduard points out [1]:
Same cleanup cycles are done in push_stack() and push_async_cb(),
both functions are only reachable from do_check_common() via
do_check() -> do_check_insn().
Hence, I think that cur state should not be freed in push_*()
functions and pop_stack() loop there is not needed.
This would also fix the 'symptom' for [2], but the issue also has a
simpler fix which was sent separately. This fix also makes sure the
push_*() callers always return an error for which
error_recoverable_with_nospec(err) is false. This is required because
otherwise we try to recover and access the stale `state`.
Moving free_verifier_state() and pop_stack(..., pop_log=false) to happen
after the bpf_vlog_reset() call in do_check_common() is fine because the
pop_stack() call that is moved does not call bpf_vlog_reset() with the
pop_log=false parameter.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/b6931bd0dd72327c55287862f821ca6c4c3eb69a.camel@gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/68497853.050a0220.33aa0e.036a.GAE@google.com/
Reported-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b6931bd0dd72327c55287862f821ca6c4c3eb69a.camel@gmail.com/
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613090157.568349-2-luis.gerhorst@fau.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
BPF_JSET is a conditional jump and currently verifier.c:can_jump()
does not know about that. This can lead to incorrect live registers
and SCC computation.
E.g. in the following example:
1: r0 = 1;
2: r2 = 2;
3: if r1 & 0x7 goto +1;
4: exit;
5: r0 = r2;
6: exit;
W/o this fix insn_successors(3) will return only (4), a jump to (5)
would be missed and r2 won't be marked as alive at (3).
Fixes: 14c8552db6 ("bpf: simple DFA-based live registers analysis")
Reported-by: syzbot+a36aac327960ff474804@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250613175331.3238739-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit adds __GFP_ACCOUNT flag to verifier induced memory
allocations. The intent is to account for all allocations reachable
from BPF_PROG_LOAD command, which is needed to track verifier memory
consumption in veristat. This includes allocations done in verifier.c,
and some allocations in btf.c, functions in log.c do not allocate.
There is also a utility function bpf_memcg_flags() which selectively
adds GFP_ACCOUNT flag depending on the `cgroup.memory=nobpf` option.
As far as I understand [1], the idea is to remove bpf_prog instances
and maps from memcg accounting as these objects do not strictly belong
to cgroup, hence it should not apply here.
(btf_parse_fields() is reachable from both program load and map
creation, but allocated record is not persistent as is freed as soon
as map_check_btf() exits).
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230210154734.4416-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250613072147.3938139-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
With input changed == NULL, a local variable is used for "changed".
Initialize tmp properly, so that it can be used in the following:
*changed |= err > 0;
Otherwise, UBSAN will complain:
UBSAN: invalid-load in kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18924:4
load of value <some random value> is not a valid value for type '_Bool'
Fixes: dfb2d4c64b ("bpf: set 'changed' status if propagate_liveness() did any updates")
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250612221100.2153401-1-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Without this, `state->speculative` is used after the cleanup cycles in
push_stack() or push_async_cb() freed `env->cur_state` (i.e., `state`).
Avoid this by relying on the short-circuit logic to only access `state`
if the error is recoverable (and make sure it never is after push_*()
failed).
push_*() callers must always return an error for which
error_recoverable_with_nospec(err) is false if push_*() returns NULL,
otherwise we try to recover and access the stale `state`. This is only
violated by sanitize_ptr_alu(), thus also fix this case to return
-ENOMEM.
state->speculative does not make sense if the error path of push_*()
ran. In that case, `state->speculative &&
error_recoverable_with_nospec(err)` as a whole should already never
evaluate to true (because all cases where push_stack() fails must return
-ENOMEM/-EFAULT). As mentioned, this is only violated by the
push_stack() call in sanitize_speculative_path() which returns -EACCES
without [1] (through REASON_STACK in sanitize_err() after
sanitize_ptr_alu()). To fix this, return -ENOMEM for REASON_STACK (which
is also the behavior we will have after [1]).
Checked that it fixes the syzbot reproducer as expected.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250603213232.339242-1-luis.gerhorst@fau.de/
Fixes: d6f1c85f22 ("bpf: Fall back to nospec for Spectre v1")
Reported-by: syzbot+b5eb72a560b8149a1885@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/38862a832b91382cddb083dddd92643bed0723b8.camel@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250611210728.266563-1-luis.gerhorst@fau.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The previous patch switched read and precision tracking for
iterator-based loops from state-graph-based loop tracking to
control-flow-graph-based loop tracking.
This patch removes the now-unused `update_loop_entry()` and
`get_loop_entry()` functions, which were part of the state-graph-based
logic.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250611200836.4135542-9-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Current loop_entry-based exact states comparison logic does not handle
the following case:
.-> A --. Assume the states are visited in the order A, B, C.
| | | Assume that state B reaches a state equivalent to state A.
| v v At this point, state C is not processed yet, so state A
'-- B C has not received any read or precision marks from C.
As a result, these marks won't be propagated to B.
If B has incomplete marks, it is unsafe to use it in states_equal()
checks.
This commit replaces the existing logic with the following:
- Strongly connected components (SCCs) are computed over the program's
control flow graph (intraprocedurally).
- When a verifier state enters an SCC, that state is recorded as the
SCC entry point.
- When a verifier state is found equivalent to another (e.g., B to A
in the example), it is recorded as a states graph backedge.
Backedges are accumulated per SCC.
- When an SCC entry state reaches `branches == 0`, read and precision
marks are propagated through the backedges (e.g., from A to B, from
C to A, and then again from A to B).
To support nested subprogram calls, the entry state and backedge list
are associated not with the SCC itself but with an object called
`bpf_scc_callchain`. A callchain is a tuple `(callsite*, scc_id)`,
where `callsite` is the index of a call instruction for each frame
except the last.
See the comments added in `is_state_visited()` and
`compute_scc_callchain()` for more details.
Fixes: 2a0992829e ("bpf: correct loop detection for iterators convergence")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250611200836.4135542-8-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The next patch would add some relatively heavy-weight operation to
clean_live_states(), this operation can be skipped if REG_LIVE_DONE
is set. Move the check from clean_verifier_state() to
clean_verifier_state() as a small refactoring commit.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250611200836.4135542-7-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add an out parameter to `propagate_liveness()` to record whether any
new liveness bits were set during its execution.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250611200836.4135542-6-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add an out parameter to `propagate_precision()` to record whether any
new precision bits were set during its execution.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250611200836.4135542-5-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Allow `mark_chain_precision()` to run from an arbitrary starting state
by replacing direct references to `env->cur_state` with a parameter.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250611200836.4135542-4-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
A function to return IP for a given frame in a call stack of a state.
Will be used by a next patch.
The `state->insn_idx = env->insn_idx;` assignment in the do_check()
allows to use frame_insn_idx with env->cur_state.
At the moment bpf_verifier_state->insn_idx is set when new cached
state is added in is_state_visited() and accessed only in the contexts
when the state is already in the cache. Hence this assignment does not
change verifier behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250611200836.4135542-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This reverts commit 96a30e469c.
Next patches in the series modify propagate_precision() to allow
arbitrary starting state. Precision propagation requires access to
jump history, and arbitrary states represent history not belonging to
`env->cur_state`.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250611200836.4135542-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This implements the core of the series and causes the verifier to fall
back to mitigating Spectre v1 using speculation barriers. The approach
was presented at LPC'24 [1] and RAID'24 [2].
If we find any forbidden behavior on a speculative path, we insert a
nospec (e.g., lfence speculation barrier on x86) before the instruction
and stop verifying the path. While verifying a speculative path, we can
furthermore stop verification of that path whenever we encounter a
nospec instruction.
A minimal example program would look as follows:
A = true
B = true
if A goto e
f()
if B goto e
unsafe()
e: exit
There are the following speculative and non-speculative paths
(`cur->speculative` and `speculative` referring to the value of the
push_stack() parameters):
- A = true
- B = true
- if A goto e
- A && !cur->speculative && !speculative
- exit
- !A && !cur->speculative && speculative
- f()
- if B goto e
- B && cur->speculative && !speculative
- exit
- !B && cur->speculative && speculative
- unsafe()
If f() contains any unsafe behavior under Spectre v1 and the unsafe
behavior matches `state->speculative &&
error_recoverable_with_nospec(err)`, do_check() will now add a nospec
before f() instead of rejecting the program:
A = true
B = true
if A goto e
nospec
f()
if B goto e
unsafe()
e: exit
Alternatively, the algorithm also takes advantage of nospec instructions
inserted for other reasons (e.g., Spectre v4). Taking the program above
as an example, speculative path exploration can stop before f() if a
nospec was inserted there because of Spectre v4 sanitization.
In this example, all instructions after the nospec are dead code (and
with the nospec they are also dead code speculatively).
For this, it relies on the fact that speculation barriers generally
prevent all later instructions from executing if the speculation was not
correct:
* On Intel x86_64, lfence acts as full speculation barrier, not only as
a load fence [3]:
An LFENCE instruction or a serializing instruction will ensure that
no later instructions execute, even speculatively, until all prior
instructions complete locally. [...] Inserting an LFENCE instruction
after a bounds check prevents later operations from executing before
the bound check completes.
This was experimentally confirmed in [4].
* On AMD x86_64, lfence is dispatch-serializing [5] (requires MSR
C001_1029[1] to be set if the MSR is supported, this happens in
init_amd()). AMD further specifies "A dispatch serializing instruction
forces the processor to retire the serializing instruction and all
previous instructions before the next instruction is executed" [8]. As
dispatch is not specific to memory loads or branches, lfence therefore
also affects all instructions there. Also, if retiring a branch means
it's PC change becomes architectural (should be), this means any
"wrong" speculation is aborted as required for this series.
* ARM's SB speculation barrier instruction also affects "any instruction
that appears later in the program order than the barrier" [6].
* PowerPC's barrier also affects all subsequent instructions [7]:
[...] executing an ori R31,R31,0 instruction ensures that all
instructions preceding the ori R31,R31,0 instruction have completed
before the ori R31,R31,0 instruction completes, and that no
subsequent instructions are initiated, even out-of-order, until
after the ori R31,R31,0 instruction completes. The ori R31,R31,0
instruction may complete before storage accesses associated with
instructions preceding the ori R31,R31,0 instruction have been
performed
Regarding the example, this implies that `if B goto e` will not execute
before `if A goto e` completes. Once `if A goto e` completes, the CPU
should find that the speculation was wrong and continue with `exit`.
If there is any other path that leads to `if B goto e` (and therefore
`unsafe()`) without going through `if A goto e`, then a nospec will
still be needed there. However, this patch assumes this other path will
be explored separately and therefore be discovered by the verifier even
if the exploration discussed here stops at the nospec.
This patch furthermore has the unfortunate consequence that Spectre v1
mitigations now only support architectures which implement BPF_NOSPEC.
Before this commit, Spectre v1 mitigations prevented exploits by
rejecting the programs on all architectures. Because some JITs do not
implement BPF_NOSPEC, this patch therefore may regress unpriv BPF's
security to a limited extent:
* The regression is limited to systems vulnerable to Spectre v1, have
unprivileged BPF enabled, and do NOT emit insns for BPF_NOSPEC. The
latter is not the case for x86 64- and 32-bit, arm64, and powerpc
64-bit and they are therefore not affected by the regression.
According to commit a6f6a95f25 ("LoongArch, bpf: Fix jit to skip
speculation barrier opcode"), LoongArch is not vulnerable to Spectre
v1 and therefore also not affected by the regression.
* To the best of my knowledge this regression may therefore only affect
MIPS. This is deemed acceptable because unpriv BPF is still disabled
there by default. As stated in a previous commit, BPF_NOSPEC could be
implemented for MIPS based on GCC's speculation_barrier
implementation.
* It is unclear which other architectures (besides x86 64- and 32-bit,
ARM64, PowerPC 64-bit, LoongArch, and MIPS) supported by the kernel
are vulnerable to Spectre v1. Also, it is not clear if barriers are
available on these architectures. Implementing BPF_NOSPEC on these
architectures therefore is non-trivial. Searching GCC and the kernel
for speculation barrier implementations for these architectures
yielded no result.
* If any of those regressed systems is also vulnerable to Spectre v4,
the system was already vulnerable to Spectre v4 attacks based on
unpriv BPF before this patch and the impact is therefore further
limited.
As an alternative to regressing security, one could still reject
programs if the architecture does not emit BPF_NOSPEC (e.g., by removing
the empty BPF_NOSPEC-case from all JITs except for LoongArch where it
appears justified). However, this will cause rejections on these archs
that are likely unfounded in the vast majority of cases.
In the tests, some are now successful where we previously had a
false-positive (i.e., rejection). Change them to reflect where the
nospec should be inserted (using __xlated_unpriv) and modify the error
message if the nospec is able to mitigate a problem that previously
shadowed another problem (in that case __xlated_unpriv does not work,
therefore just add a comment).
Define SPEC_V1 to avoid duplicating this ifdef whenever we check for
nospec insns using __xlated_unpriv, define it here once. This also
improves readability. PowerPC can probably also be added here. However,
omit it for now because the BPF CI currently does not include a test.
Limit it to EPERM, EACCES, and EINVAL (and not everything except for
EFAULT and ENOMEM) as it already has the desired effect for most
real-world programs. Briefly went through all the occurrences of EPERM,
EINVAL, and EACCESS in verifier.c to validate that catching them like
this makes sense.
Thanks to Dustin for their help in checking the vendor documentation.
[1] https://lpc.events/event/18/contributions/1954/ ("Mitigating
Spectre-PHT using Speculation Barriers in Linux eBPF")
[2] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.00078 ("VeriFence: Lightweight and
Precise Spectre Defenses for Untrusted Linux Kernel Extensions")
[3] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/runtime-speculative-side-channel-mitigations.html
("Managed Runtime Speculative Execution Side Channel Mitigations")
[4] https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3359789.3359837 ("Speculator: a
tool to analyze speculative execution attacks and mitigations" -
Section 4.6 "Stopping Speculative Execution")
[5] https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/processor-tech-docs/programmer-references/software-techniques-for-managing-speculation.pdf
("White Paper - SOFTWARE TECHNIQUES FOR MANAGING SPECULATION ON AMD
PROCESSORS - REVISION 5.09.23")
[6] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0597/2020-12/Base-Instructions/SB--Speculation-Barrier-
("SB - Speculation Barrier - Arm Armv8-A A32/T32 Instruction Set
Architecture (2020-12)")
[7] https://wiki.raptorcs.com/w/images/5/5f/OPF_PowerISA_v3.1C.pdf
("Power ISA™ - Version 3.1C - May 26, 2024 - Section 9.2.1 of Book
III")
[8] https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/processor-tech-docs/programmer-references/40332.pdf
("AMD64 Architecture Programmer’s Manual Volumes 1–5 - Revision 4.08
- April 2024 - 7.6.4 Serializing Instructions")
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Henriette Herzog <henriette.herzog@rub.de>
Cc: Dustin Nguyen <nguyen@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Maximilian Ott <ott@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Milan Stephan <milan.stephan@fau.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250603212428.338473-1-luis.gerhorst@fau.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This is made to clarify that this flag will cause a nospec to be added
after this insn and can therefore be relied upon to reduce speculative
path analysis.
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: Henriette Herzog <henriette.herzog@rub.de>
Cc: Maximilian Ott <ott@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Milan Stephan <milan.stephan@fau.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250603212024.338154-1-luis.gerhorst@fau.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This prevents us from trying to recover from these on speculative paths
in the future.
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Henriette Herzog <henriette.herzog@rub.de>
Cc: Maximilian Ott <ott@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Milan Stephan <milan.stephan@fau.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250603205800.334980-4-luis.gerhorst@fau.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Mark these cases as non-recoverable to later prevent them from being
caught when they occur during speculative path verification.
Eduard writes [1]:
The only pace I'm aware of that might act upon specific error code
from verifier syscall is libbpf. Looking through libbpf code, it seems
that this change does not interfere with libbpf.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/785b4531ce3b44a84059a4feb4ba458c68fce719.camel@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Henriette Herzog <henriette.herzog@rub.de>
Cc: Maximilian Ott <ott@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Milan Stephan <milan.stephan@fau.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250603205800.334980-3-luis.gerhorst@fau.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This is required to catch the errors later and fall back to a nospec if
on a speculative path.
Eliminate the regs variable as it is only used once and insn_idx is not
modified in-between the definition and usage.
Do not pass insn but compute it in the function itself. As Eduard points
out [1], insn is assumed to correspond to env->insn_idx in many places
(e.g, __check_reg_arg()).
Move code into do_check_insn(), replace
* "continue" with "return 0" after modifying insn_idx
* "goto process_bpf_exit" with "return PROCESS_BPF_EXIT"
* "goto process_bpf_exit_full" with "return process_bpf_exit_full()"
* "do_print_state = " with "*do_print_state = "
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/293dbe3950a782b8eb3b87b71d7a967e120191fd.camel@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Henriette Herzog <henriette.herzog@rub.de>
Cc: Maximilian Ott <ott@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Milan Stephan <milan.stephan@fau.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250603205800.334980-2-luis.gerhorst@fau.de
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When reg->type is CONST_PTR_TO_MAP, it can not be null. However the
verifier explores the branches under rX == 0 in check_cond_jmp_op()
even if reg->type is CONST_PTR_TO_MAP, because it was not checked for
in reg_not_null().
Fix this by adding CONST_PTR_TO_MAP to the set of types that are
considered non nullable in reg_not_null().
An old "unpriv: cmp map pointer with zero" selftest fails with this
change, because now early out correctly triggers in
check_cond_jmp_op(), making the verification to pass.
In practice verifier may allow pointer to null comparison in unpriv,
since in many cases the relevant branch and comparison op are removed
as dead code. So change the expected test result to __success_unpriv.
Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <isolodrai@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250609183024.359974-2-isolodrai@meta.com
