When the netfs_io_request struct's work item is queued, it must be supplied
with a ref to the work item struct to prevent it being deallocated whilst
on the queue or whilst it is being processed. This is tricky to manage as
we have to get a ref before we try and queue it and then we may find it's
already queued and is thus already holding a ref - in which case we have to
try and get rid of the ref again.
The problem comes if we're in BH or IRQ context and need to drop the ref:
if netfs_put_request() reduces the count to 0, we have to do the cleanup -
but the cleanup may need to wait.
Fix this by adding a new work item to the request, ->cleanup_work, and
dispatching that when the refcount hits zero. That can then synchronously
cancel any outstanding work on the main work item before doing the cleanup.
Adding a new work item also deals with another problem upstream where it's
sometimes changing the work func in the put function and requeuing it -
which has occasionally in the past caused the cleanup to happen
incorrectly.
As a bonus, this allows us to get rid of the 'was_async' parameter from a
bunch of functions. This indicated whether the put function might not be
permitted to sleep.
Fixes: 3d3c950467 ("netfs: Provide readahead and readpage netfs helpers")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250519090707.2848510-4-dhowells@redhat.com
cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Since we know what the contents of a symlink will be when we create it on
the server, initialise its contents locally too to avoid the need to
download it.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241216204124.3752367-31-dhowells@redhat.com
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Change the way netfslib collects read results to do all the collection for
a particular read request using a single work item that walks along the
subrequest queue as subrequests make progress or complete, unlocking folios
progressively rather than doing the unlock in parallel as parallel requests
come in.
The code is remodelled to be more like the write-side code, though only
using a single stream. This makes it more directly comparable and thus
easier to duplicate fixes between the two sides.
This has a number of advantages:
(1) It's simpler. There doesn't need to be a complex donation mechanism
to handle mismatches between the size and alignment of subrequests and
folios. The collector unlocks folios as the subrequests covering each
complete.
(2) It should cause less scheduler overhead as there's a single work item
in play unlocking pages in parallel when a read gets split up into a
lot of subrequests instead of one per subrequest.
Whilst the parallellism is nice in theory, in practice, the vast
majority of loads are sequential reads of the whole file, so
committing a bunch of threads to unlocking folios out of order doesn't
help in those cases.
(3) It should make it easier to implement content decryption. A folio
cannot be decrypted until all the requests that contribute to it have
completed - and, again, most loads are sequential and so, most of the
time, we want to begin decryption sequentially (though it's great if
the decryption can happen in parallel).
There is a disadvantage in that we're losing the ability to decrypt and
unlock things on an as-things-arrive basis which may affect some
applications.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241216204124.3752367-28-dhowells@redhat.com
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
