Currently we only mark sectors as locked if there is a *NEW* delalloc
range for it.
But NEW delalloc range is not the same as dirty sectors we want to
submit, e.g:
0 32K 64K 96K 128K
| |////////||///////| |////|
120K
For above 64K page size case, writepage_delalloc() for page 0 will find
and lock the delalloc range [32K, 96K), which is beyond the page
boundary.
Then when writepage_delalloc() is called for the page 64K, since [64K,
96K) is already locked, only [120K, 128K) will be locked.
This means, although range [64K, 96K) is dirty and will be submitted
later by extent_writepage_io(), it will not be marked as locked.
This is fine for now, as we call btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock_bitmap() to
free every non-compressed sector, and compression is only allowed for
full page range.
But this is not safe for future sector perfect compression support, as
this can lead to double folio unlock:
Thread A | Thread B
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------
| submit_one_async_extent()
| |- extent_clear_unlock_delalloc()
extent_writepage() | |- btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock()
|- btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock_bitmap()| |- btrfs_subpage_end_and_test_writer()
| | | |- atomic_sub_and_test()
| | | /* Now the atomic value is 0 */
|- if (atomic_read() == 0) | |
|- folio_unlock() | |- folio_unlock()
The root cause is the above range [64K, 96K) is dirtied and should also
be locked but it isn't.
So to make everything more consistent and prepare for the incoming
sector perfect compression, mark all dirty sectors as locked.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently for subpage (sector size < page size) cases, we reuse subpage
locked bitmap to find out all delalloc ranges we have locked, and run
all those found ranges.
However such reuse is not perfect, e.g.:
0 32K 64K 96K 128K
| |////////||///////| |////|
120K
For above range, writepage_delalloc() for page 0 will handle the range
[32K, 96k), note delalloc range can be beyond the page boundary.
But writepage_delalloc() for page 64K will only handle range [120K,
128K), as the previous run on page 0 has already handled range [64K,
96K).
Meanwhile for the writeback we should expect range [64K, 96K) to also be
locked, this leads to the mismatch from locked bitmap and delalloc
range.
This is not causing problems yet, but it's still an inconsistent
behavior.
So instead of relying on the subpage locked bitmap, move the delalloc
range search using local @delalloc_bitmap, so that we can remove the
existing btrfs_folio_find_writer_locked().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function extent_writepage_io() will submit the dirty sectors inside
the page for the write.
But recently to co-operate with the incoming subpage compression
enhancement, a new bitmap is introduced to
btrfs_bio_ctrl::submit_bitmap, to only avoid a subset of the dirty
range.
This is because we can have the following cases with 64K page size:
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
| |/////////| |/|
52K
For range [16K, 32K), we queue the dirty range for compression, which is
ran in a delayed workqueue.
Then for range [48K, 52K), we go through the regular submission path.
In that case, our btrfs_bio_ctrl::submit_bitmap will exclude the range
[16K, 32K).
The dirty flags for the range [16K, 32K) is only cleared when the
compression is done, by the extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() call inside
submit_one_async_extent().
This patch fix the false alert by removing the
btrfs_folio_assert_not_dirty() check, since it's no longer correct for
subpage compression cases.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[PROBLEM]
If sector perfect compression is enabled for sector size < page size
case, the following case can lead dirty ranges not being written back:
0 32K 64K 96K 128K
| |///////||//////| |/|
124K
In above example, the page size is 64K, and we need to write back above
two pages.
- Submit for page 0 (main thread)
We found delalloc range [32K, 96K), which can be compressed.
So we queue an async range for [32K, 96K).
This means, the page unlock/clearing dirty/setting writeback will
all happen in a workqueue context.
- The compression is done, and compressed range is submitted (workqueue)
Since the compression is done in asynchronously, the compression can
be done before the main thread to submit for page 64K.
Now the whole range [32K, 96K), involving two pages, will be marked
writeback.
- Submit for page 64K (main thread)
extent_write_cache_pages() got its wbc->sync_mode is WB_SYNC_NONE,
so it skips the writeback wait.
And unlock the page and exit. This means the dirty range [124K, 128K)
will never be submitted, until next writeback happens for page 64K.
This will never happen for previous kernels because:
- For sector size == page size case
Since one page is one sector, if a page is marked writeback it will
not have dirty flags.
So this corner case will never hit.
- For sector size < page size case
We never do subpage compression, a range can only be submitted for
compression if the range is fully page aligned.
This change makes the subpage behavior mostly the same as non-subpage
cases.
[ENHANCEMENT]
Instead of relying WB_SYNC_NONE check only, if it's a subpage case, then
always wait for writeback flags.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Most of the callers of wbc_account_cgroup_owner() are converting a folio
to page before calling the function. wbc_account_cgroup_owner() is
converting the page back to a folio to call mem_cgroup_css_from_folio().
Convert wbc_account_cgroup_owner() to take a folio instead of a page,
and convert all callers to pass a folio directly except f2fs.
Convert the page to folio for all the callers from f2fs as they were the
only callers calling wbc_account_cgroup_owner() with a page. As f2fs is
already in the process of converting to folios, these call sites might
also soon be calling wbc_account_cgroup_owner() with a folio directly in
the future.
No functional changes. Only compile tested.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240926140121.203821-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Inside lock_delalloc_folios(), there are several problems related to
sector size < page size handling:
- Set the writer locks without checking if the folio is still valid
We call btrfs_folio_start_writer_lock() just like it's folio_lock().
But since the folio may not even be the folio of the current mapping,
we can easily screw up the folio->private.
- The range is not clamped inside the page
This means we can over write other bitmaps if the start/len is not
properly handled, and trigger the btrfs_subpage_assert().
- @processed_end is always rounded up to page end
If the delalloc range is not page aligned, and we need to retry
(returning -EAGAIN), then we will unlock to the page end.
Thankfully this is not a huge problem, as now
btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() can handle range larger than the locked
range, and only unlock what is already locked.
Fix all these problems by:
- Lock and check the folio first, then call
btrfs_folio_set_writer_lock()
So that if we got a folio not belonging to the inode, we won't
touch folio->private.
- Properly truncate the range inside the page
- Update @processed_end to the locked range end
Fixes: 1e1de38792 ("btrfs: make process_one_page() to handle subpage locking")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is a replay of commit 6252690f7e ("btrfs: fix invalid
mapping of extent xarray state"). We need to call
btrfs_folio_clear_dirty() before btrfs_set_range_writeback(), so that
xarray DIRTY tag is cleared.
With a refactoring commit 8189197425 ("btrfs: refactor
__extent_writepage_io() to do sector-by-sector submission"), it screwed
up and the order is reversed and causing the same hang. Fix the ordering
now in submit_one_sector().
Fixes: 8189197425 ("btrfs: refactor __extent_writepage_io() to do sector-by-sector submission")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[SUBPAGE COMPRESSION LIMITS]
Currently inside writepage_delalloc(), if a delalloc range is going to
be submitted asynchronously (inline or compression, the page
dirty/writeback/unlock are all handled in at different time, not at the
submission time), then we return 1 and extent_writepage() will skip the
submission.
This is fine if every sector matches page size, but if a sector is
smaller than page size (aka, subpage case), then it can be very
problematic, for example for the following 64K page:
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
|/| |///////| |/|
| |
4K 52K
Where |/| is the dirty range we need to submit.
In the above case, we need the following different handling for the 3
ranges:
- [0, 4K) needs to be submitted for regular write
A single sector cannot be compressed.
- [16K, 32K) needs to be submitted for compressed write
- [48K, 52K) needs to be submitted for regular write.
Above, if we try to submit [16K, 32K) for compressed write, we will
return 1 and immediately, and without submitting the remaining
[48K, 52K) range.
Furthermore, since extent_writepage() will exit without unlocking any
sectors, the submitted range [0, 4K) will not have sector unlocked.
That's the reason why for now subpage is only allowed for full page
range.
[ENHANCEMENT]
- Introduce a submission bitmap at btrfs_bio_ctrl::submit_bitmap
This records which sectors will be submitted by extent_writepage_io().
This allows us to track which sectors needs to be submitted thus later
to be properly unlocked.
For asynchronously submitted range (inline/compression), the
corresponding bits will be cleared from that bitmap.
- Only return 1 if no sector needs to be submitted in
writepage_delalloc()
- Only submit sectors marked by submission bitmap inside
extent_writepage_io()
So we won't touch the asynchronously submitted part.
- Introduce btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock_bitmap() helper
This will only unlock the involved sectors specified by @bitmap
parameter, to avoid touching the range asynchronously submitted.
Please note that, since subpage compression is still limited to page
aligned range, this change is only a preparation for future sector
perfect compression support for subpage.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function btrfs_folio_unlock_writer() is already calling
btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() to do the heavy lifting work, the only
missing 0 writer check.
Thus there is no need to keep two different functions, move the 0 writer
check into btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock(), and remove
btrfs_folio_unlock_writer().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function btrfs_folio_end_all_writers() is only utilized in
extent_writepage() as a way to unlock all subpage range (for both
successful submission and error handling).
Meanwhile we have a similar function, btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock().
The difference is, btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() expects a range that is
a subset of the already locked range.
This limit on btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() is a little overkilled,
preventing it from being utilized for error paths.
So here we enhance btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() to accept a superset of
the locked range, and only end the locked subset.
This means we can replace btrfs_folio_end_all_writers() with
btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock() instead.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. And page_to_inode() can be replaced with folio_to_inode() now.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Moreover, use folio_pos() instead of page_offset(),
which is more consistent with folio usage.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Moreover, use folio_pos() instead of page_offset(),
which is more consistent with folio usage.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. And use folio_pos instead of page_offset, which is more
consistent with folio usage. At the same time, folio_test_private() can
handle folio directly without converting from page to folio first.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Use folio_pos instead of page_offset, which is more
consistent with folio usage.
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The old page API is being gradually replaced and converted to use folio
to improve code readability and avoid repeated conversion between page
and folio. Now clear_page_extent_mapped() can deal with a folio
directly, so change its name to clear_folio_extent_mapped().
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Historically we've held the extent lock throughout the entire read.
There's been a few reasons for this, but it's mostly just caused us
problems. For example, this prevents us from allowing page faults
during direct io reads, because we could deadlock. This has forced us
to only allow 4k reads at a time for io_uring NOWAIT requests because we
have no idea if we'll be forced to page fault and thus have to do a
whole lot of work.
On the buffered side we are protected by the page lock, as long as we're
reading things like buffered writes, punch hole, and even direct IO to a
certain degree will get hung up on the page lock while the page is in
flight.
On the direct side we have the dio extent lock, which acts much like the
way the extent lock worked previously to this patch, however just for
direct reads. This protects direct reads from concurrent direct writes,
while we're protected from buffered writes via the inode lock.
Now that we're protected in all cases, narrow the extent lock to the
part where we're getting the extent map to submit the reads, no longer
holding the extent lock for the entire read operation. Push the extent
lock down into do_readpage() so that we're only grabbing it when looking
up the extent map. This portion was contributed by Goldwyn.
Co-developed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function does not follow the pattern where the underscores would be
justified, so rename it.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function name is a bit misleading as it submits the btrfs_bio
(bbio), rename it so we can use btrfs_submit_bio() when an actual bio is
submitted.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The member btrfs_fs_info::subpage_info stores the cached bitmap start
position inside the merged bitmap.
However in reality there is only one thing depending on the sectorsize,
bitmap_nr_bits, which records the number of sectors that fit inside a
page.
The sequence of sub-bitmaps have fixed order, thus it's just a quick
multiplication to calculate the start position of each sub-bitmaps.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The parameter @nr_ret is used to tell the caller how many sectors have
been submitted for IO.
Then callers check @nr_ret value to determine if we need to manually
clear the PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY, as if we submitted no sector (e.g. all
sectors are beyond i_size) there is no folio_start_writeback() called thus
PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY tag will not be cleared.
Remove this parameter by:
- Moving the btrfs_folio_clear_writeback() call into
__extent_writepage_io()
So that if we didn't submit any IO, then manually call
btrfs_folio_set_writeback() to clear PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY when
the page is no longer dirty.
- Use a bool to record if we have submitted any sector
Instead of an int.
- Use subpage compatible helpers to end folio writeback.
This brings no change to the behavior, just for the sake of consistency.
As for the call site inside __extent_writepage(), we're always called
for the whole page, so the existing full page helper
folio_(start|end)_writeback() is totally fine.
For the call site inside extent_write_locked_range(), although we can
have subpage range, folio_start_writeback() will only clear
PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY if the page is no longer dirty, and the full folio
will still be dirty if there is any subpage dirty range.
Only when the last dirty subpage sector is cleared, the
folio_start_writeback() will clear PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY.
So no matter if we call the full page or subpage helper, the result
is still the same, then just use the subpage helpers for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Unlike the bitmap usage inside raid56, for __extent_writepage_io() we
handle the subpage submission not sector-by-sector, but for each dirty
range we found.
This is not a big deal normally, as the subpage complex code is already
mostly optimized out by the compiler for x86_64.
However for the sake of consistency and for the future of subpage
sector-perfect compression support, this patch does:
- Extract the sector submission code into submit_one_sector()
- Add the needed code to extract the dirty bitmap for subpage case
There is a small pitfall for non-subpage case, as we cleared page
dirty before starting writeback, so we have to manually set
the default dirty_bitmap to 1 for such case.
- Use bitmap_and() to calculate the target sectors we need to submit
This is done for both subpage and non-subpage cases, and will later
be expanded to skip inline/compression ranges.
For x86_64, the dirty bitmap will be fixed to 1, with the length of 1,
so we're still doing the same workload per sector.
For larger page sizes, the overhead will be a little larger, as previous
we only need to do one extent_map lookup per-dirty-range, but now it
will be one extent_map lookup per-sector.
But that is the same frequency as x86_64, so we're just aligning the
behavior to x86_64.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We already use a folio some in this function, replace all page usage
with the folio and update the function to take the folio as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that btrfs_get_extent takes a folio, update __get_extent_map to
take a folio as well.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We only pass this into read_inline_extent, change it to take a folio and
update the callers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of a page, use a folio for btrfs_writepage_cow_fixup. We
already have a folio at the only caller, and the fixup worker uses
folios.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that every function that btrfs_run_delalloc_range calls takes a
folio, update it to take a folio and update the callers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This mostly uses folios, convert it to take a folio instead and update
the callers to pass in the folio.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of taking the locked page, take the locked folio so we can pass
that into __process_folios_contig.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that this mostly uses folios, update it to take folios, use the
folios that are passed in, and rename from process_one_page =>
process_one_folio.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This operates mostly on folios, update it to take a folio for the locked
folio instead of the page, rename from __process_pages_contig =>
__process_folios_contig.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All of the callers have a folio at this point, update
__unlock_for_delalloc to take a folio so that it's consistent with its
callers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Also rename lock_delalloc_pages => lock_delalloc_folios in the process,
now that it exclusively works on folios.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of passing in a page for locked_page, pass in the folio instead.
We only use the folio itself to validate some range assumptions, and
then pass it into other functions.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We already use a folio heavily in this function, pass the folio in
directly and use it everywhere, only passing the page down to functions
that do not take a folio yet.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We only need a folio now, make it take a folio as an argument and update
all of the callers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The callers and callee's of this now all use folios, update it to take a
folio as well.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that we've gotten most of the helpers updated to only take a folio,
update __extent_writepage to only deal in folios.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of using pages for everything, find a folio and use that. This
makes things a bit cleaner as a lot of the functions calls here all take
folios.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
__extent_writepage_io uses page everywhere, but a lot of these functions
take a folio. Convert it to use the folio based helpers, and then
change it to take a folio as an argument and update its callers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Willy is wanting to get rid of page->index, convert the writepage
tracepoint to take a folio so we can do folio->index instead of
page->index.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Now that the callers and helpers mostly use folio, convert
btrfs_do_readpage to take a folio, and rename it to btrfs_do_read_folio.
Update all of the page stuff to use the folio based helpers instead.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The callers of this helper are going to be converted to using a folio,
so adjust submit_extent_page to become submit_extent_folio and update it
to use all the relevant folio helpers.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This already uses a folio internally, change it to take a folio as an
argument instead.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We have this helper function to set the page range uptodate once we're
done reading it, as well as run fsverity against it. Half of these
functions already take a folio, just rename this to end_folio_read and
then rework it to take a folio instead, and update everything
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently we're using the page for everything here. Convert this to use
the folio helpers instead.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We're the only user of readahead_page_batch(). Convert
btrfs_readahead() to use the folio based helpers to do readahead.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
