syzbot reported a lock held when returning to userspace[1]. This is
because if argc is less than 0 and the function returns directly, the held
inode lock is not released.
Fix this by store the error in ret and jump to done to clean up instead of
returning directly.
[dh: Modified Lizhi Xu's original patch to make it honour the error code
from afs_split_string()]
[1]
WARNING: lock held when returning to user space!
6.13.0-rc3-syzkaller-00209-g499551201b5f #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------
syz-executor133/5823 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
1 lock held by syz-executor133/5823:
#0: ffff888071cffc00 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9){++++}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:818 [inline]
#0: ffff888071cffc00 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#9){++++}-{4:4}, at: afs_proc_addr_prefs_write+0x2bb/0x14e0 fs/afs/addr_prefs.c:388
Reported-by: syzbot+76f33569875eb708e575@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=76f33569875eb708e575
Signed-off-by: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241226012616.2348907-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/529850.1736261552@warthog.procyon.org.uk
Tested-by: syzbot+76f33569875eb708e575@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Add a field to each address in an address list (afs_addr_list struct) that
records the current priority for that address according to the address
preference table. We don't want to do this every time we use an address
list, so the version number of the address preference table is recorded in
the address list too and we only re-mark the list when we see the version
change.
These numbers are then displayed through /proc/net/afs/servers.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
AFS servers may have multiple addresses, but the client can't easily judge
between them as to which one is best. For instance, an address that has a
larger RTT might actually have a better bandwidth because it goes through a
switch rather than being directly connected - but we can't work this out
dynamically unless we push through sufficient data that we can measure it.
To allow the administrator to configure this, add a list of preference
weightings for server addresses by IPv4/IPv6 address or subnet and allow
this to be viewed through a procfile and altered by writing text commands
to that same file. Preference rules can be added/updated by:
echo "add <proto> <addr>[/<subnet>] <prior>" >/proc/fs/afs/addr_prefs
echo "add udp 1.2.3.4 1000" >/proc/fs/afs/addr_prefs
echo "add udp 192.168.0.0/16 3000" >/proc/fs/afs/addr_prefs
echo "add udp 1001:2002:0:6::/64 4000" >/proc/fs/afs/addr_prefs
and removed by:
echo "del <proto> <addr>[/<subnet>]" >/proc/fs/afs/addr_prefs
echo "del udp 1.2.3.4" >/proc/fs/afs/addr_prefs
where the priority is a number between 0 and 65535.
The list is split between IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and each sublist is kept
in numerical order, with rules that would otherwise match but have
different subnet masking being ordered with the most specific submatch
first.
A subsequent patch will apply these rules.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
