As talked about in commit d2aacaf073 ("drm/panel: Check for already
prepared/enabled in drm_panel"), we want to remove needless code from
panel drivers that was storing and double-checking the
prepared/enabled state. Even if someone was relying on the
double-check before, that double-check is now in the core and not
needed in individual drivers.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240503143327.RFT.v2.16.I4f574b87fe24765ddd4424437159b37a6481aa1a@changeid
The ltk101b4029w ist a 10.1 inch DSI panel and shares the same supplies
and startup timings with the existing ltk500hd1829.
So simply add it as a variant with its own init sequence and display-mode.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
Acked-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240215090515.3513817-4-heiko@sntech.de
There exist more dsi-panels from Leadtek sharing supplies and timings
with only the panel-mode and init commands differing.
So make room in the driver to also keep variants here instead of
requiring additional drivers per panel.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
Reviewed-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240215090515.3513817-2-heiko@sntech.de
All implementations return 0 and the return value of mipi_dsi_drv_remove()
is ignored anyhow.
So change the prototype of the remove function to return no value. This
way driver authors are not tempted to assume that passing an error to
the upper layer is a good idea. All drivers are adapted accordingly.
There is no intended change of behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220708094922.1408248-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Many of the DSI flags have names opposite to their actual effects,
e.g. MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET means that EoT packets will actually
be disabled. Fix this by including _NO_ in the flag names, e.g.
MIPI_DSI_MODE_NO_EOT_PACKET.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Xin Ji <xji@analogixsemi.com> # anx7625.c
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org> # msm/dsi
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210727094435.v3.1.I629b2366a6591410359c7fcf6d385b474b705ca2@changeid
Standardize on the dev_ based logging and drop the include of drm_print.h.
Fix a few cases where "x@" was used when printing the mode.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200815125406.1153224-3-sam@ravnborg.org
The currently listed dotclock disagrees with the currently
listed vrefresh rate. Change the dotclock to match the vrefresh.
Someone tell me which (if either) of the dotclock or vreresh is
correct?
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200302203452.17977-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
The LTK500HD1829 is 5.5" DSI display.
v5:
- Fix some trivial checkpatch warnings while applying (sam)
changes in v4:
- drop error message if backlight not found, no other panel
does that and if needed it should live in drm_panel_of_backlight
changes in v3:
- drop one more overlooked panel->drm access
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191224112641.30647-3-heiko@sntech.de
