commit a8972d5a49 ("drm: panel: jd9365da-h3: fix reset signal polarity")
fixed reset signal polarity in jadard_dsi_probe() and jadard_prepare().
It was not done in jadard_unprepare() because of an incorrect assumption
about reset line handling in power off mode. After looking into the
datasheet, it now appears that before disabling regulators, the reset line
is deasserted first, and if reset_before_power_off_vcioo is true, then the
reset line is asserted.
Fix reset polarity by inverting gpiod_set_value() second argument in
in jadard_unprepare().
Fixes: 6b818c533d ("drm: panel: Add Jadard JD9365DA-H3 DSI panel")
Fixes: 2b976ad760 ("drm/panel: jd9365da: Support for kd101ne3-40ti MIPI-DSI panel")
Fixes: a8972d5a49 ("drm: panel: jd9365da-h3: fix reset signal polarity")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250417195507.778731-1-hugo@hugovil.com
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250417195507.778731-1-hugo@hugovil.com
In jadard_prepare() a reset pulse is generated with the following
statements (delays ommited for clarity):
gpiod_set_value(jadard->reset, 1); --> Deassert reset
gpiod_set_value(jadard->reset, 0); --> Assert reset for 10ms
gpiod_set_value(jadard->reset, 1); --> Deassert reset
However, specifying second argument of "0" to gpiod_set_value() means to
deassert the GPIO, and "1" means to assert it. If the reset signal is
defined as GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW in the DTS, the above statements will
incorrectly generate the reset pulse (inverted) and leave it asserted
(LOW) at the end of jadard_prepare().
Fix reset behavior by inverting gpiod_set_value() second argument
in jadard_prepare(). Also modify second argument to devm_gpiod_get()
in jadard_dsi_probe() to assert the reset when probing.
Do not modify it in jadard_unprepare() as it is already properly
asserted with "1", which seems to be the intended behavior.
Fixes: 6b818c533d ("drm: panel: Add Jadard JD9365DA-H3 DSI panel")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240927135306.857617-1-hugo@hugovil.com
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240927135306.857617-1-hugo@hugovil.com
Move the "exit sleep mode" and "set display on" command from
enable() to init() function.
As mentioned in the patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240624141926.5250-2-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com/
The Mediatek Soc DSI host has different modes in prepare() and
enable() functions, prepare() is in LP mode and enable() is in
HS mode. Since the "exit sleep mode" and "set display on"
command must also be sent in LP mode, so we also move "exit
sleep mode" and "set display on" command to the init() function.
We have no other actions in the enable() function after moves
"exit sleep mode" and "set display on", and we checked the call
of the enable() function during the "startup" process. It seems
that only one judgment was made in drm_panel_enabel(). If the
panel does not define enable(), the judgment will skip the
enable() and continue execution. This does not seem to have
any other effect, and we found that some drivers also seem
to have no enable() function added, for example:
panel-asus-z00t-tm5p5-n35596 / panel-boe-himax8279d...
In addition, we briefly tested the kingdisplay_kd101ne3 panel and
melfas_lmfbx101117480 panel, and it seems that there is no garbage
on the panel, so we delete enable() function.
After moving the "exit sleep mode" and "set display on" command
to the init() function, we no longer need additional delay
judgment, so we delete variables "exit_sleep_to_display_on_delay_ms"
and "display_on_delay_ms".
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiong Lv <lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
Acked-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240807100429.13260-2-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240807100429.13260-2-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
Currently, the init_code of the jd9365da driver is placed
in the enable() function and sent, but this seems to take
a long time. It takes 17ms to send each instruction (an init
code consists of about 200 instructions), so it takes
about 3.5s to send the init_code. So we moved the sending
of the inti_code to the prepare() function, and each
instruction seemed to take only 25μs.
We checked the DSI host and found that the difference in
command sending time is caused by the different modes of
the DSI host in prepare() and enable() functions.
Our DSI Host only supports sending cmd in LP mode, The
prepare() function can directly send init_code (LP->cmd)
in LP mode, but the enable() function is in HS mode and
needs to switch to LP mode before sending init code
(HS->LP->cmd->HS). Therefore, it takes longer to send
the command.
Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiong Lv <lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240624141926.5250-2-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624141926.5250-2-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230714174545.4056287-1-robh@kernel.org
Radxa Display 8HD is a family of DSI panels from Radxa that
uses jd9365da-h3 IC.
Add support for it.
Co-developed-by: Stephen Chen <stephen@radxa.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Chen <stephen@radxa.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230123183312.436573-4-jagan@edgeble.ai
