Forward declare struct drm_printer instead of including drm/drm_print.h,
as we only need the pointer. Turns out quite a few places depend on this
include implicitly. Make them explicit.
Some of the includes are just stale and unnecessary. Group the forward
declarations together while at it.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250326115452.2090275-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Some DSI panel vendors end up hardcoding PPS params because of which
it does not listen to the params sent from the source. We use the
default config tables for DSI panels when using DSC 1.1 rather than
calculate our own rc parameters.
--v2
-Use intel_crtc_has_type [Jani]
--v4
-Use a function to check Mipi dsi dsc 1.1 condition [Ankit]
-Add documentation for using this condition [Ankit]
-Rebase
--v5
-Pass only the crtc_state [Jani]
-Fixup the comment [Jani]
-Check for dsc major version [Jani]
-Use co-developed-by tag [Jani]
--v6
-Add more definition of the issue and solution in the comment [Ankit]
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel/-/issues/13719
Co-developed-by: William Tseng <william.tseng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250228152531.403026-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Pass intel_display to the display power stuff. These are spread
all over the place so tend to hinder clean conversions of whole
files.
TODO: The gt part/unpark power domain shenanigans need some
kind of more abstract interface...
v2: Deal with cmtg
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Fix all typos in files under drm/i915/display reported by codespell tool.
v2:
- Include british and american spelling, as those are
not typos.
- Fix commenting style. <Jani>
v3: Fix "In case" wrongly capitalized and
also fix comment style. <Krzysztof Niemiec>
Signed-off-by: Nitin Gote <nitin.r.gote@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Niemiec <krzysztof.niemiec@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250120081517.3237326-8-nitin.r.gote@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We get range_bpg_offset for different bpps based on
linear-interpolation from values given for nearby bpps.
Use a helper to get these values.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250110044131.3162682-2-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
Introduce the register bits to enable the 3rd DSC engine VDSC2.
Add support to read/write these bits.
v2: Only introduce bits that are used and update the subject and commit
message. (Suraj)
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241030041036.1238006-5-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
At the moment dsc_split represents whether the dsc splitter is used
or not. With 3 DSC engines, the splitter can split into two streams
or three streams.
Instead of representing the splitter's state, it is more effective to
represent the number of DSC streams per pipe.
Replace the `dsc.dsc_split` member with `dsc.num_streams` to indicate the
number of DSC streams used per pipe. This change will implicitly
convey the splitter's operation mode.
v2: Avoid new enum for dsc split. (Suraj)
v3:
-Replace dsc_split with num_stream. (Suraj)
-Avoid extra parentheses. (Jani)
v4: Set num_streams to 1, if VDSC_JOINER not set while readout.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241030041036.1238006-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
Add changes to DSC which are required for Ultrajoiner.
v2:
-Use correct helper for setting bits for bigjoiner secondary. (Ankit)
-Use primary/secondary instead of master/slave. (Suraj)
v3: Add the ultrajoiner helpers and use it for setting ultrajoiner
bits (Ankit)
v4: Use num_vdsc_instances *= num_joined_pipes (Ville)
v5: Align the helper to get ultrajoiner enabled pipes with other helpers
(Ville)
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240930163549.416410-7-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
DSC does not support bpc under 8 according to DSC 1.2a Section 2
Requirements. Return an error if that happens to be the case.
--v2
-should be bit_per_component [Mitul/Chaitanya]
-Add reference to this restriction [Chaitanya]
--v3
-Add the bpc in which we see this warning [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240926081327.1409518-2-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
In most of the cases we now try to avoid mentioning things like
"bigjoiner" or "ultrajoiner" trying to unify the API and refer
mostly to all this functionality as "joiner".
In majority cases that should be way to go.
However in some cases we still need to distinguish between
bigjoiner primaries and secondaries(such as DSC register programming).
Create correspondent helper functions and start using them,
in order be prepared for adding ultrajoiner functionality.
v2: Fixed checkpatch warnings (Ankit)
v3: Introduce ultrajoiner helpers in next patch.
v4: Streamline the helpers and add few more. (Ville)
v5: Add comment to clarify that helpers apply to both bigjoiner and
uncompressed joiner configurations. (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240918063016.2667721-2-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
The Display Engine's DSC register values are deducted from the DSC
configuration stored in intel_crtc_state::dsc. The latter one is
dumped in a human-readable format, so dumping the register values is
redundant, remove it.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240805150802.3568970-8-imre.deak@intel.com
According to BSpec we now should call "master" pipes, "primary" pipes
and "slave" pipes, should be "secondary" pipes.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
[vsyrjala: Don't rename port sync stuff, catch a few more things]
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240603112551.6481-3-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
Lets unify both bigjoiner and ultrajoiner under simple "joiner" name,
because in future we might have multiple configurations, involving
multiple bigjoiners, ultrajoiner, however it is possible to use
same api for handling both.
v2: - Renamed back some bigjoiner specific parts for now(Ville)
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
[vsyrjala: Catch a few more cases]
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240607075457.15700-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
Consider the fractional bpp while reading the qp values.
v2: Use helpers for fractional, integral bits of bits_per_pixel. (Suraj)
Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231110101020.4067342-6-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
DSC parameter bits_per_pixel is stored in U6.4 format.
The 4 bits represent the fractional part of the bpp.
Currently we use compressed_bpp member of dsc structure to store
only the integral part of the bits_per_pixel.
To store the full bits_per_pixel along with the fractional part,
compressed_bpp is changed to store bpp in U6.4 formats. Intergral
part is retrieved by simply right shifting the member compressed_bpp by 4.
v2:
-Use to_bpp_int, to_bpp_frac_dec, to_bpp_x16 helpers while dealing
with compressed bpp. (Suraj)
-Fix comment styling. (Suraj)
v3:
-Add separate file for 6.4 fixed point helper(Jani, Nikula)
-Add comment for magic values(Suraj)
v4:
-Fix checkpatch warnings caused by renaming(Suraj)
v5:
-Rebase.
-Use existing helpers for conversion of bpp_int to bpp_x16
and vice versa.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231110101020.4067342-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
pic_width when written into the PPS register is divided by the no.
of vdsc instances first but the actual variable that we compare it
to does not change i.e vdsc_cfg->pic_width hence when reading the
register back for pic_width it needs to be multiplied by
num_vdsc_instances rather than being divided.
Fixes: 8b70b56917 ("drm/i915/vdsc: Fill the intel_dsc_get_pps_config function")
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230911193742.836063-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Register read functions usually return the value instead of passing via
pointer parameters. Return the multiple register verification results
via a pointer parameter, which can also be NULL to skip the extra
checks.
Make the name conform to existing style better while at it.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4d08c0f63c4975cc8cd01b0f82845c989bf13dd0.1693933849.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Register read functions usually return the value instead of passing via
pointer parameters. The calling code becomes easier to read.
Make the name conform to existing style better while at it.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/89b7d70bb19114ab3ff0e150a4b862d8032f136d.1693933849.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Make it clear what's the number of vdsc per pipe, and what's the number
of registers to grab. Have intel_dsc_get_pps_reg() return the registers
it knows even if the requested amount is bigger.
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/e2551b52ac0dd2b4ffe18d5e7733fafdc191d68a.1693933849.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
We have setup both the read and write functions so we can
move ahead and fill in all the readout state from PPS register
into the crtc_state so we can send it for comparision.
--v2
-Shorten comment to just PPSX rather than having the whole
"Readout PPSX register" [Jani]
-Remove pps_temp reinitialization as its being initialized in
the read function [Jani]
-Use REG_FIELD_GET to readout certain fields of dsc registers
[Jani]
--v9
-Place the masks at a more appropriate place [Ankit]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230828054300.560559-8-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Now that we have a function that reads any PPS register based
on intel_dsc_pps enum provided lets create a function that can
write on any PPS.
--v2
-Changes need as PPS enum was dropped
-Remove duplicated code in intel_dsc_write_pps_reg [Jani]
--v3
-Use dsc_split instead of num_vdsc_instances [Ankit]
--v5
-Changes to implement the new dsc_reg array variable passing
[Ankit]
--v7
-Pass no of vdsc instances to get_pps_reg [Ankit]
--v8
-No need for dsc_reg dynamic allocation [Jani]
-Change function to void as no return needs to be sent back
--v9
-Send ARRAY_SIZE(dsc_reg) instead of vdsc_per_pipe [Ankit]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230828054300.560559-6-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Add function to read any PPS register based on the
intel_dsc_pps enum provided. Add a function which will call the
new pps read function and place it in crtc state. Only PPS0 and
PPS1 are readout the rest of the registers will be read in upcoming
patches.
--v2
-Changes in read function as PPS enum is removed
-Initialize pps_val as 0 in pps_read func itself [Jani]
-Create a function that gets the required register and call that
in the common read function [Jani]
-Move the drm_WARN_ON one abstraction layer above [Jani]
--v3
-Send both reg values regardless of dsc engine no [Jani]
-Don't use num_vdsc_instances stick to dsc_split field [Ankit]
--v4
-Manipulate the reg values instead of creating MACRO to change
name of pps [Ankit]
--v5
-Read dsc reg values using array rather than individual variables
[Ankit]
-Loop the verification of all dsc engine reads to future proof it
[Ankit]
-Keep the fix me comment in this patch and remove it in later one
where we add other readouts [Ankit]
-Add switch statement that fills in the required registers based on
no of vdsc engines per pipe.
--v7
-Pass no of vdsc instances from read_reg function [Ankit]
-Fix issue where arrays do not get freed on return for read_and_verify
func [Ankit]
--v8
-Simplify reading and verifying of register and remove dynamically
allocated arrays [Jani]
-Remove no_ from no_vdsc_per_pipe and wherever else it applies [Ankit]
--v9
-change variable name to dsc_reg_size rather than vdsc_per_pipe [Ankit]
--v10
-remove switch case as we never enter case1 [Ankit]
--v11
-Add _ prefix for register that are not supposed to be used directly
[Jani]
-Remove REG suffix from register macros [Jani]
-Do not duplicate register read [Jani]
--v12
-Use vdsc_per_pipe rather than array size of dsc_reg [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230828054300.560559-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
We have a function that gets us the total of the vdsc engines being
used but not the no. of vdsc instances being used by each pipe.
--v6
-Change function to static
--v7
-Shorten name to intel_dsc_get_vdsc_per_pipe
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230828054300.560559-4-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
In intel_vdsc_get_config we only read the primary dsc engine register
and not take into account if the other dsc engine is in use and if
both registers have the same value or not this patche fixes that by
adding a check.
--v3
-Remove superfluos new line [Jani]
-Fix register naming [Jani]
--v5
-pps_temp0/pps_temp1 can be assigned where they are used [Ankit]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230828054300.560559-3-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
On checking DSC1.1 Errata and DSC 1.2 spec the current formula
we were using was incorrect to calculate first_line_bpg_offset.
The new fixed formula is derived from C model.
--v2
-Use clamp function in linux/minmax.h [Ankit]
--v3
-remove linux/minmax.h header
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230804083737.3844575-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Remove the FIXME and the code related to it as after verification
it does seem the previous values were typos and no hardware spec
mentions using these particular rc_params.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230626130555.2391750-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Some rc_range_parameter calculations were missed for YCbCr420,
add them to calculate_rc_param()
--v2
-take into account the new formula to get bpp_i
--v4
-Fix range_bpg_offset formula for YCbCr420 bpp <= 16 [Ankit]
--v5
-Fix comment and mention use of DSC C Model [Ankit]
Cc: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230710162456.2736949-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Move rc_param calculation for native_420 into calculate_rc_parameter.
second_line_bpg_offset and second_line_offset_adj are both rc params
and it would be better to have these calculated where all the other
rc parameters are calculated.
--v2
-Add the reason for commit in commit message [Jani]
--v3
-Move nsl_second_line_bpg_offset with the other 420 calculation
in calculate_rc_param [Ankit]
--v4
-Fix comment alignment [Ankit]
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230705051502.2568245-2-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Currently we are using dsc_split and bigjoiner variables for determining
amount of VDSC instances, however that might change in future, if we happen
to have more of those.
So lets pack all that logic into single function for convenience, so that
at least this isn't hardcoded throughout the whole VDSC code.
v2: - s/u8/int/ (Jani Nikula)
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230704131758.14024-2-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
The array of rc_parameters contains a mixture of parameters from DSC 1.1
and DSC 1.2 standards. Split these tow configuration arrays in
preparation to adding more configuration data.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230517102807.2181589-7-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Stop using an interim structure rc_parameters for storing calculated
params and then setting drm_dsc_config using that structure. Instead put
calculated params into the struct drm_dsc_config directly.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230517102807.2181589-5-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Move DSC RC tables to DRM DSC helper. No additional code changes
and/or cleanups are a part of this commit, it will be cleaned up in the
followup commits.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230517102807.2181589-4-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
The rc_buf_thresh values are common to all DSC implementations. Move
them to the common helper together with the code to propagate them to
the drm_dsc_config.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230517102807.2181589-3-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
After cross-checking DSC models (20150914, 20161212, 20210623) change
values in rc_parameters tables to follow config files present inside
the DSC model. Handle two places, where i915 tables diverged from the
model, by patching the rc values in the code.
Note: I left one case uncorrected, 8bpp/10bpc/range_max_qp[0], because
the table in the VESA DSC 1.1 sets it to 4.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230517102807.2181589-2-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Add function to check if slice design requirements are being
met as defined in Bspec: 49259 in the section
Slice Design Requirement
--v7
-remove full bspec link [Jani]
-rename intel_dsc_check_slice_design_req to
intel_dsc_slice_dimensions_valid [Jani]
--v8
-fix condition to check if slice width and height are
of two
-fix minimum pixel in slice condition
--v10
-condition should be < rather then >= [Uma]
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230309062855.393087-7-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
