Doing:
#include <linux/mem_encrypt.h>
Causes a bunch of compiler failures due to missing implicit includes that
don't happen on x86:
../arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_cmds.h:117:2: error: call to undeclared library function 'memcpy' with type 'void *(void *, const void *, unsigned long)'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
117 | memcpy(®s.a1, challenge, size);
../arch/arm64/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h:19:49: warning: declaration of 'struct device' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility]
19 | static inline bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
../arch/arm64/include/asm/rsi_cmds.h:44:38: error: call to undeclared function 'virt_to_phys'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
44 | arm_smccc_smc(SMC_RSI_REALM_CONFIG, virt_to_phys(cfg),
Add the missing includes to the arch/arm headers to avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0-v1-47aadfbd64cd+25795-arm_memenc_h_jgg@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
On Arm CCA, with RMM-v1.0, all MMIO regions are shared. However, in
the future, an Arm CCA-v1.0 compliant guest may be run in a lesser
privileged partition in the Realm World (with Arm CCA-v1.1 Planes
feature). In this case, some of the MMIO regions may be emulated
by a higher privileged component in the Realm world, i.e, protected.
Thus the guest must decide today, whether a given MMIO region is shared
vs Protected and create the stage1 mapping accordingly. On Arm CCA, this
detection is based on the "IPA State" (RIPAS == RIPAS_IO). Provide a
helper to run this check on a given range of MMIO.
Also, provide a arm64 helper which may be hooked in by other solutions.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017131434.40935-5-steven.price@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
The RMM (Realm Management Monitor) provides functionality that can be
accessed by a realm guest through SMC (Realm Services Interface) calls.
The SMC definitions are based on DEN0137[1] version 1.0-rel0.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0137/1-0rel0/
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241017131434.40935-2-steven.price@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
