Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Howells
904abff4b1
netfs: Fix read-retry for fs with no ->prepare_read()
Fix netfslib's read-retry to only call ->prepare_read() in the backing
filesystem such a function is provided.  We can get to this point if a
there's an active cache as failed reads from the cache need negotiating
with the server instead.

Fixes: ee4cdf7ba8 ("netfs: Speed up buffered reading")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/529329.1736261010@warthog.procyon.org.uk
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-01-09 17:20:04 +01:00
David Howells
d4e338de17
netfs: Fix is-caching check in read-retry
netfs: Fix is-caching check in read-retry

The read-retry code checks the NETFS_RREQ_COPY_TO_CACHE flag to determine
if there might be failed reads from the cache that need turning into reads
from the server, with the intention of skipping the complicated part if it
can.  The code that set the flag, however, got lost during the read-side
rewrite.

Fix the check to see if the cache_resources are valid instead.  The flag
can then be removed.

Fixes: ee4cdf7ba8 ("netfs: Speed up buffered reading")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3752048.1734381285@warthog.procyon.org.uk
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-12-20 22:07:58 +01:00
David Howells
4acb665cf4
netfs: Work around recursion by abandoning retry if nothing read
syzkaller reported recursion with a loop of three calls (netfs_rreq_assess,
netfs_retry_reads and netfs_rreq_terminated) hitting the limit of the stack
during an unbuffered or direct I/O read.

There are a number of issues:

 (1) There is no limit on the number of retries.

 (2) A subrequest is supposed to be abandoned if it does not transfer
     anything (NETFS_SREQ_NO_PROGRESS), but that isn't checked under all
     circumstances.

 (3) The actual root cause, which is this:

	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rreq->nr_outstanding))
		netfs_rreq_terminated(rreq, ...);

     When we do a retry, we bump the rreq->nr_outstanding counter to
     prevent the final cleanup phase running before we've finished
     dispatching the retries.  The problem is if we hit 0, we have to do
     the cleanup phase - but we're in the cleanup phase and end up
     repeating the retry cycle, hence the recursion.

Work around the problem by limiting the number of retries.  This is based
on Lizhi Xu's patch[1], and makes the following changes:

 (1) Replace NETFS_SREQ_NO_PROGRESS with NETFS_SREQ_MADE_PROGRESS and make
     the filesystem set it if it managed to read or write at least one byte
     of data.  Clear this bit before issuing a subrequest.

 (2) Add a ->retry_count member to the subrequest and increment it any time
     we do a retry.

 (3) Remove the NETFS_SREQ_RETRYING flag as it is superfluous with
     ->retry_count.  If the latter is non-zero, we're doing a retry.

 (4) Abandon a subrequest if retry_count is non-zero and we made no
     progress.

 (5) Use ->retry_count in both the write-side and the read-size.

[?] Question: Should I set a hard limit on retry_count in both read and
    write?  Say it hits 50, we always abandon it.  The problem is that
    these changes only mitigate the issue.  As long as it made at least one
    byte of progress, the recursion is still an issue.  This patch
    mitigates the problem, but does not fix the underlying cause.  I have
    patches that will do that, but it's an intrusive fix that's currently
    pending for the next merge window.

The oops generated by KASAN looks something like:

   BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at ffffc9000482ff48 (stack is ffffc90004830000..ffffc90004838000)
   Oops: stack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
   ...
   RIP: 0010:mark_lock+0x25/0xc60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4686
    ...
    mark_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4646 [inline]
    __lock_acquire+0x906/0x3ce0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5156
    lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
    local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
    ___slab_alloc+0x123/0x1880 mm/slub.c:3695
    __slab_alloc.constprop.0+0x56/0xb0 mm/slub.c:3908
    __slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3961 [inline]
    slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4122 [inline]
    kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x2a7/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4141
    radix_tree_node_alloc.constprop.0+0x1e8/0x350 lib/radix-tree.c:253
    idr_get_free+0x528/0xa40 lib/radix-tree.c:1506
    idr_alloc_u32+0x191/0x2f0 lib/idr.c:46
    idr_alloc+0xc1/0x130 lib/idr.c:87
    p9_tag_alloc+0x394/0x870 net/9p/client.c:321
    p9_client_prepare_req+0x19f/0x4d0 net/9p/client.c:644
    p9_client_zc_rpc.constprop.0+0x105/0x880 net/9p/client.c:793
    p9_client_read_once+0x443/0x820 net/9p/client.c:1570
    p9_client_read+0x13f/0x1b0 net/9p/client.c:1534
    v9fs_issue_read+0x115/0x310 fs/9p/vfs_addr.c:74
    netfs_retry_read_subrequests fs/netfs/read_retry.c:60 [inline]
    netfs_retry_reads+0x153a/0x1d00 fs/netfs/read_retry.c:232
    netfs_rreq_assess+0x5d3/0x870 fs/netfs/read_collect.c:371
    netfs_rreq_terminated+0xe5/0x110 fs/netfs/read_collect.c:407
    netfs_retry_reads+0x155e/0x1d00 fs/netfs/read_retry.c:235
    netfs_rreq_assess+0x5d3/0x870 fs/netfs/read_collect.c:371
    netfs_rreq_terminated+0xe5/0x110 fs/netfs/read_collect.c:407
    netfs_retry_reads+0x155e/0x1d00 fs/netfs/read_retry.c:235
    netfs_rreq_assess+0x5d3/0x870 fs/netfs/read_collect.c:371
    ...
    netfs_rreq_terminated+0xe5/0x110 fs/netfs/read_collect.c:407
    netfs_retry_reads+0x155e/0x1d00 fs/netfs/read_retry.c:235
    netfs_rreq_assess+0x5d3/0x870 fs/netfs/read_collect.c:371
    netfs_rreq_terminated+0xe5/0x110 fs/netfs/read_collect.c:407
    netfs_retry_reads+0x155e/0x1d00 fs/netfs/read_retry.c:235
    netfs_rreq_assess+0x5d3/0x870 fs/netfs/read_collect.c:371
    netfs_rreq_terminated+0xe5/0x110 fs/netfs/read_collect.c:407
    netfs_dispatch_unbuffered_reads fs/netfs/direct_read.c:103 [inline]
    netfs_unbuffered_read fs/netfs/direct_read.c:127 [inline]
    netfs_unbuffered_read_iter_locked+0x12f6/0x19b0 fs/netfs/direct_read.c:221
    netfs_unbuffered_read_iter+0xc5/0x100 fs/netfs/direct_read.c:256
    v9fs_file_read_iter+0xbf/0x100 fs/9p/vfs_file.c:361
    do_iter_readv_writev+0x614/0x7f0 fs/read_write.c:832
    vfs_readv+0x4cf/0x890 fs/read_write.c:1025
    do_preadv fs/read_write.c:1142 [inline]
    __do_sys_preadv fs/read_write.c:1192 [inline]
    __se_sys_preadv fs/read_write.c:1187 [inline]
    __x64_sys_preadv+0x22d/0x310 fs/read_write.c:1187
    do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
    do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83

Fixes: ee4cdf7ba8 ("netfs: Speed up buffered reading")
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1fc6f64c40a9d143cfb6
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241108034020.3695718-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213135013.2964079-9-dhowells@redhat.com
Tested-by: syzbot+885c03ad650731743489@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: syzbot+885c03ad650731743489@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-12-20 22:07:57 +01:00
David Howells
ee4cdf7ba8
netfs: Speed up buffered reading
Improve the efficiency of buffered reads in a number of ways:

 (1) Overhaul the algorithm in general so that it's a lot more compact and
     split the read submission code between buffered and unbuffered
     versions.  The unbuffered version can be vastly simplified.

 (2) Read-result collection is handed off to a work queue rather than being
     done in the I/O thread.  Multiple subrequests can be processes
     simultaneously.

 (3) When a subrequest is collected, any folios it fully spans are
     collected and "spare" data on either side is donated to either the
     previous or the next subrequest in the sequence.

Notes:

 (*) Readahead expansion is massively slows down fio, presumably because it
     causes a load of extra allocations, both folio and xarray, up front
     before RPC requests can be transmitted.

 (*) RDMA with cifs does appear to work, both with SIW and RXE.

 (*) PG_private_2-based reading and copy-to-cache is split out into its own
     file and altered to use folio_queue.  Note that the copy to the cache
     now creates a new write transaction against the cache and adds the
     folios to be copied into it.  This allows it to use part of the
     writeback I/O code.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814203850.2240469-20-dhowells@redhat.com/ # v2
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-12 12:20:41 +02:00