mfd: sec-irq: s2dos05 doesn't support interrupts

The commit bf231e5feb ("mfd: sec-core: Add support for the Samsung
s2dos05") adding s2dos05 support didn't add anything related to IRQ
support, so I assume this works without IRQs.

Rather than printing a warning message in sec_irq_init() due to the
missing IRQ number, or returning an error due to a missing irq chip
regmap, just return early explicitly.

This will become particularly important once errors from sec_irq_init()
aren't ignored anymore in an upcoming patch and helps the reader of
this code while reasoning about what the intention might be here.

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250409-s2mpg10-v4-15-d66d5f39b6bf@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
André Draszik 2025-04-09 21:37:36 +01:00 committed by Lee Jones
parent 1cea1b6b2c
commit fcc7f3b675

View file

@ -452,16 +452,12 @@ int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic)
int type = sec_pmic->device_type;
const struct regmap_irq_chip *sec_irq_chip;
if (!sec_pmic->irq) {
dev_warn(sec_pmic->dev,
"No interrupt specified, no interrupts\n");
return 0;
}
switch (type) {
case S5M8767X:
sec_irq_chip = &s5m8767_irq_chip;
break;
case S2DOS05:
return 0;
case S2MPA01:
sec_irq_chip = &s2mps14_irq_chip;
break;
@ -492,6 +488,12 @@ int sec_irq_init(struct sec_pmic_dev *sec_pmic)
sec_pmic->device_type);
}
if (!sec_pmic->irq) {
dev_warn(sec_pmic->dev,
"No interrupt specified, no interrupts\n");
return 0;
}
ret = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(sec_pmic->dev, sec_pmic->regmap_pmic,
sec_pmic->irq, IRQF_ONESHOT,
0, sec_irq_chip, &sec_pmic->irq_data);