linux/drivers/net/wireless/silabs/wfx/bh.c

325 lines
8.6 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* Interrupt bottom half (BH).
*
* Copyright (c) 2017-2020, Silicon Laboratories, Inc.
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
* Copyright (c) 2010, ST-Ericsson
*/
#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
#include <net/mac80211.h>
#include "bh.h"
#include "wfx.h"
#include "hwio.h"
#include "traces.h"
#include "hif_rx.h"
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
#include "hif_api_cmd.h"
static void device_wakeup(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
{
int max_retry = 3;
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
if (!wdev->pdata.gpio_wakeup)
return;
if (gpiod_get_value_cansleep(wdev->pdata.gpio_wakeup) > 0)
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
return;
if (wfx_api_older_than(wdev, 1, 4)) {
gpiod_set_value_cansleep(wdev->pdata.gpio_wakeup, 1);
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
if (!completion_done(&wdev->hif.ctrl_ready))
usleep_range(2000, 2500);
return;
}
for (;;) {
gpiod_set_value_cansleep(wdev->pdata.gpio_wakeup, 1);
/* completion.h does not provide any function to wait completion without consume it
* (a kind of wait_for_completion_done_timeout()). So we have to emulate it.
*/
if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&wdev->hif.ctrl_ready, msecs_to_jiffies(2))) {
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
complete(&wdev->hif.ctrl_ready);
return;
} else if (max_retry-- > 0) {
/* Older firmwares have a race in sleep/wake-up process. Redo the process
* is sufficient to unfreeze the chip.
*/
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
dev_err(wdev->dev, "timeout while wake up chip\n");
gpiod_set_value_cansleep(wdev->pdata.gpio_wakeup, 0);
usleep_range(2000, 2500);
} else {
dev_err(wdev->dev, "max wake-up retries reached\n");
return;
}
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
}
}
static void device_release(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
{
if (!wdev->pdata.gpio_wakeup)
return;
gpiod_set_value_cansleep(wdev->pdata.gpio_wakeup, 0);
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
}
static int rx_helper(struct wfx_dev *wdev, size_t read_len, int *is_cnf)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct wfx_hif_msg *hif;
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
size_t alloc_len;
size_t computed_len;
int release_count;
int piggyback = 0;
WARN(read_len > round_down(0xFFF, 2) * sizeof(u16), "request exceed the chip capability");
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
/* Add 2 to take into account piggyback size */
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
alloc_len = wdev->hwbus_ops->align_size(wdev->hwbus_priv, read_len + 2);
skb = dev_alloc_skb(alloc_len);
if (!skb)
return -ENOMEM;
if (wfx_data_read(wdev, skb->data, alloc_len))
goto err;
piggyback = le16_to_cpup((__le16 *)(skb->data + alloc_len - 2));
_trace_piggyback(piggyback, false);
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
hif = (struct wfx_hif_msg *)skb->data;
WARN(hif->encrypted & 0x3, "encryption is unsupported");
if (WARN(read_len < sizeof(struct wfx_hif_msg), "corrupted read"))
goto err;
computed_len = le16_to_cpu(hif->len);
computed_len = round_up(computed_len, 2);
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
if (computed_len != read_len) {
dev_err(wdev->dev, "inconsistent message length: %zu != %zu\n",
computed_len, read_len);
print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, "hif: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1,
hif, read_len, true);
goto err;
}
if (!(hif->id & HIF_ID_IS_INDICATION)) {
(*is_cnf)++;
if (hif->id == HIF_CNF_ID_MULTI_TRANSMIT)
release_count =
((struct wfx_hif_cnf_multi_transmit *)hif->body)->num_tx_confs;
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
else
release_count = 1;
WARN(wdev->hif.tx_buffers_used < release_count, "corrupted buffer counter");
wdev->hif.tx_buffers_used -= release_count;
}
_trace_hif_recv(hif, wdev->hif.tx_buffers_used);
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
if (hif->id != HIF_IND_ID_EXCEPTION && hif->id != HIF_IND_ID_ERROR) {
if (hif->seqnum != wdev->hif.rx_seqnum)
dev_warn(wdev->dev, "wrong message sequence: %d != %d\n",
hif->seqnum, wdev->hif.rx_seqnum);
wdev->hif.rx_seqnum = (hif->seqnum + 1) % (HIF_COUNTER_MAX + 1);
}
staging: wfx: fix access to le32 attribute 'len' Sparse complains about the accesses to the field 'len' from struct hif_msg: drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c:88:32: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c:88:32: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c:93:32: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c:93:32: warning: cast to restricted __le16 drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c:93:32: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c:121:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base types) drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c:121:25: expected unsigned int len drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c:121:25: got restricted __le16 [usertype] len drivers/staging/wfx/hif_rx.c:27:22: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer drivers/staging/wfx/hif_rx.c:347:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 7 (different base types) drivers/staging/wfx/hif_rx.c:347:39: expected unsigned int [usertype] len drivers/staging/wfx/hif_rx.c:347:39: got restricted __le16 const [usertype] len drivers/staging/wfx/hif_rx.c:365:39: warning: incorrect type in argument 7 (different base types) drivers/staging/wfx/hif_rx.c:365:39: expected unsigned int [usertype] len drivers/staging/wfx/hif_rx.c:365:39: got restricted __le16 const [usertype] len drivers/staging/wfx/./traces.h:195:1: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) drivers/staging/wfx/./traces.h:195:1: expected int msg_len drivers/staging/wfx/./traces.h:195:1: got restricted __le16 const [usertype] len drivers/staging/wfx/./traces.h:195:1: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) drivers/staging/wfx/./traces.h:195:1: expected int msg_len drivers/staging/wfx/./traces.h:195:1: got restricted __le16 const [usertype] len drivers/staging/wfx/debug.c:319:20: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer drivers/staging/wfx/secure_link.c:85:27: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer drivers/staging/wfx/secure_link.c:85:27: warning: restricted __le16 degrades to integer Indeed, the attribute len is little-endian. We have to take to the endianness when we access it. Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512150414.267198-14-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-12 17:04:10 +02:00
skb_put(skb, le16_to_cpu(hif->len));
/* wfx_handle_rx takes care on SKB livetime */
wfx_handle_rx(wdev, skb);
if (!wdev->hif.tx_buffers_used)
wake_up(&wdev->hif.tx_buffers_empty);
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
return piggyback;
err:
if (skb)
dev_kfree_skb(skb);
return -EIO;
}
static int bh_work_rx(struct wfx_dev *wdev, int max_msg, int *num_cnf)
{
size_t len;
int i;
int ctrl_reg, piggyback;
piggyback = 0;
for (i = 0; i < max_msg; i++) {
if (piggyback & CTRL_NEXT_LEN_MASK)
ctrl_reg = piggyback;
else if (try_wait_for_completion(&wdev->hif.ctrl_ready))
ctrl_reg = atomic_xchg(&wdev->hif.ctrl_reg, 0);
else
ctrl_reg = 0;
if (!(ctrl_reg & CTRL_NEXT_LEN_MASK))
return i;
/* ctrl_reg units are 16bits words */
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
len = (ctrl_reg & CTRL_NEXT_LEN_MASK) * 2;
piggyback = rx_helper(wdev, len, num_cnf);
if (piggyback < 0)
return i;
if (!(piggyback & CTRL_WLAN_READY))
dev_err(wdev->dev, "unexpected piggyback value: ready bit not set: %04x\n",
piggyback);
}
if (piggyback & CTRL_NEXT_LEN_MASK) {
ctrl_reg = atomic_xchg(&wdev->hif.ctrl_reg, piggyback);
complete(&wdev->hif.ctrl_ready);
if (ctrl_reg)
dev_err(wdev->dev, "unexpected IRQ happened: %04x/%04x\n",
ctrl_reg, piggyback);
}
return i;
}
static void tx_helper(struct wfx_dev *wdev, struct wfx_hif_msg *hif)
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
{
int ret;
void *data;
bool is_encrypted = false;
size_t len = le16_to_cpu(hif->len);
WARN(len < sizeof(*hif), "try to send corrupted data");
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
hif->seqnum = wdev->hif.tx_seqnum;
wdev->hif.tx_seqnum = (wdev->hif.tx_seqnum + 1) % (HIF_COUNTER_MAX + 1);
data = hif;
WARN(len > le16_to_cpu(wdev->hw_caps.size_inp_ch_buf),
"request exceed the chip capability: %zu > %d\n",
len, le16_to_cpu(wdev->hw_caps.size_inp_ch_buf));
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
len = wdev->hwbus_ops->align_size(wdev->hwbus_priv, len);
ret = wfx_data_write(wdev, data, len);
if (ret)
goto end;
wdev->hif.tx_buffers_used++;
_trace_hif_send(hif, wdev->hif.tx_buffers_used);
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
end:
if (is_encrypted)
kfree(data);
}
static int bh_work_tx(struct wfx_dev *wdev, int max_msg)
{
struct wfx_hif_msg *hif;
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
int i;
for (i = 0; i < max_msg; i++) {
hif = NULL;
if (wdev->hif.tx_buffers_used < le16_to_cpu(wdev->hw_caps.num_inp_ch_bufs)) {
if (try_wait_for_completion(&wdev->hif_cmd.ready)) {
WARN(!mutex_is_locked(&wdev->hif_cmd.lock), "data locking error");
hif = wdev->hif_cmd.buf_send;
} else {
hif = wfx_tx_queues_get(wdev);
}
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
}
if (!hif)
return i;
tx_helper(wdev, hif);
}
return i;
}
/* In SDIO mode, it is necessary to make an access to a register to acknowledge last received
* message. It could be possible to restrict this acknowledge to SDIO mode and only if last
* operation was rx.
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
*/
static void ack_sdio_data(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
{
u32 cfg_reg;
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
wfx_config_reg_read(wdev, &cfg_reg);
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
if (cfg_reg & 0xFF) {
dev_warn(wdev->dev, "chip reports errors: %02x\n", cfg_reg & 0xFF);
wfx_config_reg_write_bits(wdev, 0xFF, 0x00);
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
}
}
static void bh_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct wfx_dev *wdev = container_of(work, struct wfx_dev, hif.bh);
int stats_req = 0, stats_cnf = 0, stats_ind = 0;
bool release_chip = false, last_op_is_rx = false;
int num_tx, num_rx;
device_wakeup(wdev);
do {
num_tx = bh_work_tx(wdev, 32);
stats_req += num_tx;
if (num_tx)
last_op_is_rx = false;
num_rx = bh_work_rx(wdev, 32, &stats_cnf);
stats_ind += num_rx;
if (num_rx)
last_op_is_rx = true;
} while (num_rx || num_tx);
stats_ind -= stats_cnf;
if (last_op_is_rx)
ack_sdio_data(wdev);
if (!wdev->hif.tx_buffers_used && !work_pending(work)) {
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
device_release(wdev);
release_chip = true;
}
_trace_bh_stats(stats_ind, stats_req, stats_cnf, wdev->hif.tx_buffers_used, release_chip);
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
}
/* An IRQ from chip did occur */
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
void wfx_bh_request_rx(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
{
u32 cur, prev;
wfx_control_reg_read(wdev, &cur);
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
prev = atomic_xchg(&wdev->hif.ctrl_reg, cur);
complete(&wdev->hif.ctrl_ready);
queue_work(wdev->bh_wq, &wdev->hif.bh);
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
if (!(cur & CTRL_NEXT_LEN_MASK))
dev_err(wdev->dev, "unexpected control register value: length field is 0: %04x\n",
cur);
if (prev != 0)
dev_err(wdev->dev, "received IRQ but previous data was not (yet) read: %04x/%04x\n",
prev, cur);
}
/* Driver want to send data */
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
void wfx_bh_request_tx(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
{
queue_work(wdev->bh_wq, &wdev->hif.bh);
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
}
/* If IRQ is not available, this function allow to manually poll the control register and simulate
* an IRQ ahen an event happened.
*
* Note that the device has a bug: If an IRQ raise while host read control register, the IRQ is
* lost. So, use this function carefully (only duing device initialisation).
*/
void wfx_bh_poll_irq(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
{
ktime_t now, start;
u32 reg;
WARN(!wdev->poll_irq, "unexpected IRQ polling can mask IRQ");
flush_workqueue(wdev->bh_wq);
start = ktime_get();
for (;;) {
wfx_control_reg_read(wdev, &reg);
now = ktime_get();
if (reg & 0xFFF)
break;
if (ktime_after(now, ktime_add_ms(start, 1000))) {
dev_err(wdev->dev, "time out while polling control register\n");
return;
}
udelay(200);
}
wfx_bh_request_rx(wdev);
}
staging: wfx: add IRQ handling bh_work() is in charge to schedule all HIF message from/to chip. On normal operation, when an IRQ is received, driver can get size of next message in control register. In order to save control register access, when chip send a message, it also appends a copy of control register after the message (this register is not accounted in message length declared in message header, but must accounted in bus request). This copy of control register is called "piggyback". It also handles a power saving mechanism specific to WFxxx series. This mechanism is based on a GPIO called "wakeup" GPIO. Obviously, this gpio is not part of SPI/SDIO standard buses and must be declared independently (this is the main reason for why SDIO mode try to get parameters from DT). When wakeup is enabled, host can communicate with chip only if it is awake. To wake up chip, there are two cases: - host receive an IRQ from chip (chip initiate communication): host just have to set wakeup GPIO before reading data - host want to send data to chip: host set wakeup GPIO, then wait for an IRQ (in fact, wait for an empty message) and finally send data bh_work() is also in charge to track usage of chip buffers. Normally each request expect a confirmation. However, you can notice that special "multi tx" confirmation can acknowledge multiple requests at time. Finally, note that wfx_bh_request_rx() is not atomic (because of control_reg_read()). So, in SPI mode, hard-irq handler only postpone all processing to wfx_spi_request_rx(). Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190919142527.31797-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-09-19 14:25:40 +00:00
void wfx_bh_register(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
{
INIT_WORK(&wdev->hif.bh, bh_work);
init_completion(&wdev->hif.ctrl_ready);
init_waitqueue_head(&wdev->hif.tx_buffers_empty);
}
void wfx_bh_unregister(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
{
flush_work(&wdev->hif.bh);
}