linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c

499 lines
13 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */
#include <linux/btf.h>
#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
#include <linux/error-injection.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/percpu-defs.h>
#include <linux/sysfs.h>
#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
#include "bpf_testmod.h"
#include "bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include "bpf_testmod-events.h"
typedef int (*func_proto_typedef)(long);
typedef int (*func_proto_typedef_nested1)(func_proto_typedef);
typedef int (*func_proto_typedef_nested2)(func_proto_typedef_nested1);
DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_testmod_ksym_percpu) = 123;
long bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 {
int a;
};
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 {
long a;
long b;
};
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 {
int a;
int b[];
};
__diag_push();
__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
"Global functions as their definitions will be in bpf_testmod.ko BTF");
noinline int
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 a, int b, int c) {
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a.a + a.b + b + c;
return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
}
noinline int
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_2(int a, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 b, int c) {
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a + b.a + b.b + c;
return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
}
noinline int
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_3(int a, int b, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 c) {
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a + b + c.a + c.b;
return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
}
noinline int
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_4(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 a, int b,
int c, int d, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 e) {
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a.a + b + c + d + e.a + e.b;
return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
}
noinline int
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_5(void) {
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = 1;
return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
}
noinline int
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_6(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *a) {
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a->b[0];
return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
}
__bpf_kfunc void
bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc(int i)
{
*(int *)this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_testmod_ksym_percpu) = i;
}
__bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_testmod_seq_new(struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq *it, s64 value, int cnt)
{
if (cnt < 0) {
it->cnt = 0;
return -EINVAL;
}
it->value = value;
it->cnt = cnt;
return 0;
}
__bpf_kfunc s64 *bpf_iter_testmod_seq_next(struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq* it)
{
if (it->cnt <= 0)
return NULL;
it->cnt--;
return &it->value;
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy(struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq *it)
{
it->cnt = 0;
}
selftests/bpf: add a selftest with __user tag Added a selftest with three__user usages: a __user pointer-type argument in bpf_testmod, a __user pointer-type struct member in bpf_testmod, and a __user pointer-type struct member in vmlinux. In all cases, directly accessing the user memory will result verification failure. $ ./test_progs -v -n 22/3 ... libbpf: prog 'test_user1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_user1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- R1 type=ctx expected=fp 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(test_user1, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *arg) 0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1' arg0 has btf_id 136561 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1' 1: R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = arg->a; 1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_' ... #22/3 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_user_mod1:OK $ ./test_progs -v -n 22/4 ... libbpf: prog 'test_user2': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_user2': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- R1 type=ctx expected=fp 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(test_user2, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2 *arg) 0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_2' arg0 has btf_id 136563 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2' 1: R1_w=ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = arg->p->a; 1: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) ; R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = arg->p->a; 2: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_' ... #22/4 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_user_mod2:OK $ ./test_progs -v -n 22/5 ... libbpf: prog 'test_sys_getsockname': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_sys_getsockname': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- R1 type=ctx expected=fp 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(test_sys_getsockname, int fd, struct sockaddr *usockaddr, 0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8) func '__sys_getsockname' arg1 has btf_id 2319 type STRUCT 'sockaddr' 1: R1_w=user_ptr_sockaddr(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = usockaddr->sa_family; 1: (69) r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 +0) R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_' ... #22/5 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_user_vmlinux:OK Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127154616.659314-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-01-27 07:46:16 -08:00
struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 {
int a;
};
struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2 {
struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 __user *p;
};
selftests/bpf: Add a test for btf_type_tag "percpu" Add test for percpu btf_type_tag. Similar to the "user" tag, we test the following cases: 1. __percpu struct field. 2. __percpu as function parameter. 3. per_cpu_ptr() accepts dynamically allocated __percpu memory. Because the test for "user" and the test for "percpu" are very similar, a little bit of refactoring has been done in btf_tag.c. Basically, both tests share the same function for loading vmlinux and module btf. Example output from log: > ./test_progs -v -t btf_tag libbpf: prog 'test_percpu1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_percpu1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- ... ; g = arg->a; 1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access percpu memory: off=0 ... test_btf_type_tag_mod_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec #26/6 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_mod1:OK libbpf: prog 'test_percpu2': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_percpu2': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- ... ; g = arg->p->a; 2: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access percpu memory: off=0 ... test_btf_type_tag_mod_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec #26/7 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_mod2:OK libbpf: prog 'test_percpu_load': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_percpu_load': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- ... ; g = (__u64)cgrp->rstat_cpu->updated_children; 2: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +48) R1 is ptr_cgroup_rstat_cpu access percpu memory: off=48 ... test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu_load 0 nsec #26/8 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_vmlinux_load:OK load_btfs:PASS:could not load vmlinux BTF 0 nsec test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu_helper 0 nsec #26/9 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_vmlinux_helper:OK Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-5-haoluo@google.com
2022-03-04 11:16:57 -08:00
struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_3 {
struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 __percpu *p;
};
selftests/bpf: add a selftest with __user tag Added a selftest with three__user usages: a __user pointer-type argument in bpf_testmod, a __user pointer-type struct member in bpf_testmod, and a __user pointer-type struct member in vmlinux. In all cases, directly accessing the user memory will result verification failure. $ ./test_progs -v -n 22/3 ... libbpf: prog 'test_user1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_user1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- R1 type=ctx expected=fp 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(test_user1, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *arg) 0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1' arg0 has btf_id 136561 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1' 1: R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = arg->a; 1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_' ... #22/3 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_user_mod1:OK $ ./test_progs -v -n 22/4 ... libbpf: prog 'test_user2': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_user2': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- R1 type=ctx expected=fp 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(test_user2, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2 *arg) 0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_2' arg0 has btf_id 136563 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2' 1: R1_w=ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = arg->p->a; 1: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) ; R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = arg->p->a; 2: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_' ... #22/4 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_user_mod2:OK $ ./test_progs -v -n 22/5 ... libbpf: prog 'test_sys_getsockname': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_sys_getsockname': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- R1 type=ctx expected=fp 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(test_sys_getsockname, int fd, struct sockaddr *usockaddr, 0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8) func '__sys_getsockname' arg1 has btf_id 2319 type STRUCT 'sockaddr' 1: R1_w=user_ptr_sockaddr(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = usockaddr->sa_family; 1: (69) r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 +0) R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_' ... #22/5 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_user_vmlinux:OK Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127154616.659314-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-01-27 07:46:16 -08:00
noinline int
bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1(struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 __user *arg) {
BTF_TYPE_EMIT(func_proto_typedef);
BTF_TYPE_EMIT(func_proto_typedef_nested1);
BTF_TYPE_EMIT(func_proto_typedef_nested2);
selftests/bpf: add a selftest with __user tag Added a selftest with three__user usages: a __user pointer-type argument in bpf_testmod, a __user pointer-type struct member in bpf_testmod, and a __user pointer-type struct member in vmlinux. In all cases, directly accessing the user memory will result verification failure. $ ./test_progs -v -n 22/3 ... libbpf: prog 'test_user1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_user1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- R1 type=ctx expected=fp 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(test_user1, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *arg) 0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1' arg0 has btf_id 136561 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1' 1: R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = arg->a; 1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_' ... #22/3 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_user_mod1:OK $ ./test_progs -v -n 22/4 ... libbpf: prog 'test_user2': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_user2': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- R1 type=ctx expected=fp 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(test_user2, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2 *arg) 0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_2' arg0 has btf_id 136563 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2' 1: R1_w=ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = arg->p->a; 1: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) ; R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = arg->p->a; 2: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_' ... #22/4 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_user_mod2:OK $ ./test_progs -v -n 22/5 ... libbpf: prog 'test_sys_getsockname': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_sys_getsockname': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- R1 type=ctx expected=fp 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(test_sys_getsockname, int fd, struct sockaddr *usockaddr, 0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8) func '__sys_getsockname' arg1 has btf_id 2319 type STRUCT 'sockaddr' 1: R1_w=user_ptr_sockaddr(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = usockaddr->sa_family; 1: (69) r1 = *(u16 *)(r1 +0) R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_' ... #22/5 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_user_vmlinux:OK Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127154616.659314-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-01-27 07:46:16 -08:00
return arg->a;
}
noinline int
bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_2(struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2 *arg) {
return arg->p->a;
}
selftests/bpf: Add a test for btf_type_tag "percpu" Add test for percpu btf_type_tag. Similar to the "user" tag, we test the following cases: 1. __percpu struct field. 2. __percpu as function parameter. 3. per_cpu_ptr() accepts dynamically allocated __percpu memory. Because the test for "user" and the test for "percpu" are very similar, a little bit of refactoring has been done in btf_tag.c. Basically, both tests share the same function for loading vmlinux and module btf. Example output from log: > ./test_progs -v -t btf_tag libbpf: prog 'test_percpu1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_percpu1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- ... ; g = arg->a; 1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access percpu memory: off=0 ... test_btf_type_tag_mod_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec #26/6 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_mod1:OK libbpf: prog 'test_percpu2': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_percpu2': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- ... ; g = arg->p->a; 2: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access percpu memory: off=0 ... test_btf_type_tag_mod_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec #26/7 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_mod2:OK libbpf: prog 'test_percpu_load': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_percpu_load': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- ... ; g = (__u64)cgrp->rstat_cpu->updated_children; 2: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +48) R1 is ptr_cgroup_rstat_cpu access percpu memory: off=48 ... test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu_load 0 nsec #26/8 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_vmlinux_load:OK load_btfs:PASS:could not load vmlinux BTF 0 nsec test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu 0 nsec test_btf_type_tag_vmlinux_percpu:PASS:btf_type_tag_percpu_helper 0 nsec #26/9 btf_tag/btf_type_tag_percpu_vmlinux_helper:OK Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-5-haoluo@google.com
2022-03-04 11:16:57 -08:00
noinline int
bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_percpu_1(struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 __percpu *arg) {
return arg->a;
}
noinline int
bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_percpu_2(struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_3 *arg) {
return arg->p->a;
}
noinline int bpf_testmod_loop_test(int n)
{
selftests/bpf: Keep the loop in bpf_testmod_loop_test Some compilers (for example clang-15) optimize bpf_testmod_loop_test and remove the loop: gcc version (gdb) disassemble bpf_testmod_loop_test Dump of assembler code for function bpf_testmod_loop_test: 0x0000000000000570 <+0>: callq 0x575 <bpf_testmod_loop_test+5> 0x0000000000000575 <+5>: xor %eax,%eax 0x0000000000000577 <+7>: test %edi,%edi 0x0000000000000579 <+9>: jle 0x587 <bpf_testmod_loop_test+23> 0x000000000000057b <+11>: xor %edx,%edx 0x000000000000057d <+13>: add %edx,%eax 0x000000000000057f <+15>: add $0x1,%edx 0x0000000000000582 <+18>: cmp %edx,%edi 0x0000000000000584 <+20>: jne 0x57d <bpf_testmod_loop_test+13> 0x0000000000000586 <+22>: retq 0x0000000000000587 <+23>: retq clang-15 version (gdb) disassemble bpf_testmod_loop_test Dump of assembler code for function bpf_testmod_loop_test: 0x0000000000000450 <+0>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) 0x0000000000000455 <+5>: test %edi,%edi 0x0000000000000457 <+7>: jle 0x46b <bpf_testmod_loop_test+27> 0x0000000000000459 <+9>: lea -0x1(%rdi),%eax 0x000000000000045c <+12>: lea -0x2(%rdi),%ecx 0x000000000000045f <+15>: imul %rax,%rcx 0x0000000000000463 <+19>: shr %rcx 0x0000000000000466 <+22>: lea -0x1(%rdi,%rcx,1),%eax 0x000000000000046a <+26>: retq 0x000000000000046b <+27>: xor %eax,%eax 0x000000000000046d <+29>: retq Note: The jne instruction is removed in clang-15 version. Force the compile to keep the loop by making sum volatile. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230412210423.900851-4-song@kernel.org
2023-04-12 14:04:23 -07:00
/* Make sum volatile, so smart compilers, such as clang, will not
* optimize the code by removing the loop.
*/
volatile int sum = 0;
int i;
/* the primary goal of this test is to test LBR. Create a lot of
* branches in the function, so we can catch it easily.
*/
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
sum += i;
return sum;
}
__weak noinline struct file *bpf_testmod_return_ptr(int arg)
{
static struct file f = {};
switch (arg) {
case 1: return (void *)EINVAL; /* user addr */
case 2: return (void *)0xcafe4a11; /* user addr */
case 3: return (void *)-EINVAL; /* canonical, but invalid */
case 4: return (void *)(1ull << 60); /* non-canonical and invalid */
case 5: return (void *)~(1ull << 30); /* trigger extable */
case 6: return &f; /* valid addr */
case 7: return (void *)((long)&f | 1); /* kernel tricks */
default: return NULL;
}
}
noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test1(int a)
{
return a + 1;
}
noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test2(int a, u64 b)
{
return a + b;
}
noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(char a, int b, u64 c)
{
return a + b + c;
}
__diag_pop();
int bpf_testmod_fentry_ok;
noinline ssize_t
bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)
{
struct bpf_testmod_test_read_ctx ctx = {
.buf = buf,
.off = off,
.len = len,
};
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 struct_arg1 = {10};
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 struct_arg2 = {2, 3};
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *struct_arg3;
int i = 1;
while (bpf_testmod_return_ptr(i))
i++;
(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1(struct_arg2, 1, 4);
(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_2(1, struct_arg2, 4);
(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_3(1, 4, struct_arg2);
(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_4(struct_arg1, 1, 2, 3, struct_arg2);
(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_5();
struct_arg3 = kmalloc((sizeof(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3) +
sizeof(int)), GFP_KERNEL);
if (struct_arg3 != NULL) {
struct_arg3->b[0] = 1;
(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_6(struct_arg3);
kfree(struct_arg3);
}
/* This is always true. Use the check to make sure the compiler
* doesn't remove bpf_testmod_loop_test.
*/
if (bpf_testmod_loop_test(101) > 100)
trace_bpf_testmod_test_read(current, &ctx);
/* Magic number to enable writable tp */
if (len == 64) {
struct bpf_testmod_test_writable_ctx writable = {
.val = 1024,
};
trace_bpf_testmod_test_writable_bare(&writable);
if (writable.early_ret)
return snprintf(buf, len, "%d\n", writable.val);
}
if (bpf_testmod_fentry_test1(1) != 2 ||
bpf_testmod_fentry_test2(2, 3) != 5 ||
bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(4, 5, 6) != 15)
goto out;
bpf_testmod_fentry_ok = 1;
out:
return -EIO; /* always fail */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bpf_testmod_test_read);
ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_testmod_test_read, ERRNO);
noinline ssize_t
bpf_testmod_test_write(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
char *buf, loff_t off, size_t len)
{
struct bpf_testmod_test_write_ctx ctx = {
.buf = buf,
.off = off,
.len = len,
};
trace_bpf_testmod_test_write_bare(current, &ctx);
return -EIO; /* always fail */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bpf_testmod_test_write);
ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_testmod_test_write, ERRNO);
static struct bin_attribute bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file __ro_after_init = {
.attr = { .name = "bpf_testmod", .mode = 0666, },
.read = bpf_testmod_test_read,
.write = bpf_testmod_test_write,
};
BTF_SET8_START(bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_new, KF_ITER_NEW)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
BTF_SET8_END(bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids)
static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_set = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.set = &bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids,
};
__bpf_kfunc u64 bpf_kfunc_call_test1(struct sock *sk, u32 a, u64 b, u32 c, u64 d)
{
return a + b + c + d;
}
__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_call_test2(struct sock *sk, u32 a, u32 b)
{
return a + b;
}
__bpf_kfunc struct sock *bpf_kfunc_call_test3(struct sock *sk)
{
return sk;
}
__bpf_kfunc long noinline bpf_kfunc_call_test4(signed char a, short b, int c, long d)
{
/* Provoke the compiler to assume that the caller has sign-extended a,
* b and c on platforms where this is required (e.g. s390x).
*/
return (long)a + (long)b + (long)c + d;
}
static struct prog_test_ref_kfunc prog_test_struct = {
.a = 42,
.b = 108,
.next = &prog_test_struct,
.cnt = REFCOUNT_INIT(1),
};
__bpf_kfunc struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *
bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(unsigned long *scalar_ptr)
{
refcount_inc(&prog_test_struct.cnt);
return &prog_test_struct;
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_offset(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
__bpf_kfunc struct prog_test_member *
bpf_kfunc_call_memb_acquire(void)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
return NULL;
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_memb1_release(struct prog_test_member1 *p)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
static int *__bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p, const int size)
{
if (size > 2 * sizeof(int))
return NULL;
return (int *)p;
}
__bpf_kfunc int *bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdwr_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p,
const int rdwr_buf_size)
{
return __bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_mem(p, rdwr_buf_size);
}
__bpf_kfunc int *bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdonly_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p,
const int rdonly_buf_size)
{
return __bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_mem(p, rdonly_buf_size);
}
/* the next 2 ones can't be really used for testing expect to ensure
* that the verifier rejects the call.
* Acquire functions must return struct pointers, so these ones are
* failing.
*/
__bpf_kfunc int *bpf_kfunc_call_test_acq_rdonly_mem(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p,
const int rdonly_buf_size)
{
return __bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_mem(p, rdonly_buf_size);
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_int_mem_release(int *p)
{
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass_ctx(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass1(struct prog_test_pass1 *p)
{
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass2(struct prog_test_pass2 *p)
{
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail1(struct prog_test_fail1 *p)
{
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail2(struct prog_test_fail2 *p)
{
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail3(struct prog_test_fail3 *p)
{
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(void *mem, int mem__sz)
{
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail1(void *mem, int len)
{
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2(u64 *mem, int len)
{
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p)
{
/* p != NULL, but p->cnt could be 0 */
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive(void)
{
}
__bpf_kfunc static u32 bpf_kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg(u32 arg, u32 unused)
{
return arg;
}
BTF_SET8_START(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test1)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test2)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test3)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test4)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail1)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_memb_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_memb1_release, KF_RELEASE)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdwr_mem, KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_get_rdonly_mem, KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_acq_rdonly_mem, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_int_mem_release, KF_RELEASE)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass_ctx)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass1)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass2)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail1)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail2)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail3)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_RCU)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive, KF_DESTRUCTIVE)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_static_unused_arg)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_offset)
BTF_SET8_END(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_testmod_kfunc_set = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.set = &bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids,
};
noinline int bpf_fentry_shadow_test(int a)
{
return a + 2;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_fentry_shadow_test);
selftests/bpf: Add test for race in btf_try_get_module This adds a complete test case to ensure we never take references to modules not in MODULE_STATE_LIVE, which can lead to UAF, and it also ensures we never access btf->kfunc_set_tab in an inconsistent state. The test uses userfaultfd to artificially widen the race. When run on an unpatched kernel, it leads to the following splat: [root@(none) bpf]# ./test_progs -t bpf_mod_race/ksym [ 55.498171] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffbfff802548b [ 55.499206] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 55.499855] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 55.500555] PGD a4fa9067 P4D a4fa9067 PUD a4fa5067 PMD 1b44067 PTE 0 [ 55.501499] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI [ 55.502195] CPU: 0 PID: 83 Comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G OE 5.16.0-rc4+ #151 [ 55.503388] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ArchLinux 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [ 55.504777] Workqueue: events bpf_prog_free_deferred [ 55.505563] RIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x184/0x1d0 [ 55.509140] RSP: 0018:ffff88800560fcf0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 55.509977] RAX: fffffbfff802548b RBX: fffffbfff802548c RCX: ffffffff9337b6ba [ 55.511096] RDX: fffffbfff802548c RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffffc012a458 [ 55.512143] RBP: fffffbfff802548b R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffffffc012a45b [ 55.513228] R10: fffffbfff802548b R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888001b5f598 [ 55.514332] R13: ffff888004f49ac8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888092449400 [ 55.515418] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888092400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 55.516705] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 55.517560] CR2: fffffbfff802548b CR3: 0000000007c10006 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 [ 55.518672] PKRU: 55555554 [ 55.519022] Call Trace: [ 55.519483] <TASK> [ 55.519884] module_put.part.0+0x2a/0x180 [ 55.520642] bpf_prog_free_deferred+0x129/0x2e0 [ 55.521478] process_one_work+0x4fa/0x9e0 [ 55.522122] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x100/0x100 [ 55.522878] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x60/0x60 [ 55.523551] worker_thread+0x2eb/0x700 [ 55.524176] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd8/0xf0 [ 55.524853] ? process_one_work+0x9e0/0x9e0 [ 55.525544] kthread+0x23a/0x270 [ 55.526088] ? set_kthread_struct+0x80/0x80 [ 55.526798] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 55.527413] </TASK> [ 55.527813] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [last unloaded: bpf_testmod] [ 55.530846] CR2: fffffbfff802548b [ 55.531341] ---[ end trace 1af41803c054ad6d ]--- [ 55.532136] RIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x184/0x1d0 [ 55.535887] RSP: 0018:ffff88800560fcf0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 55.536711] RAX: fffffbfff802548b RBX: fffffbfff802548c RCX: ffffffff9337b6ba [ 55.537821] RDX: fffffbfff802548c RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffffc012a458 [ 55.538899] RBP: fffffbfff802548b R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffffffc012a45b [ 55.539928] R10: fffffbfff802548b R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888001b5f598 [ 55.541021] R13: ffff888004f49ac8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888092449400 [ 55.542108] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888092400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 55.543260]CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 55.544136] CR2: fffffbfff802548b CR3: 0000000007c10006 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 [ 55.545317] PKRU: 55555554 [ 55.545671] note: kworker/0:2[83] exited with preempt_count 1 Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-11-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-01-14 22:09:53 +05:30
extern int bpf_fentry_test1(int a);
static int bpf_testmod_init(void)
{
int ret;
ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC, &bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_set);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_testmod_kfunc_set);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &bpf_testmod_kfunc_set);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, &bpf_testmod_kfunc_set);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
selftests/bpf: Add test for race in btf_try_get_module This adds a complete test case to ensure we never take references to modules not in MODULE_STATE_LIVE, which can lead to UAF, and it also ensures we never access btf->kfunc_set_tab in an inconsistent state. The test uses userfaultfd to artificially widen the race. When run on an unpatched kernel, it leads to the following splat: [root@(none) bpf]# ./test_progs -t bpf_mod_race/ksym [ 55.498171] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffbfff802548b [ 55.499206] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 55.499855] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 55.500555] PGD a4fa9067 P4D a4fa9067 PUD a4fa5067 PMD 1b44067 PTE 0 [ 55.501499] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI [ 55.502195] CPU: 0 PID: 83 Comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G OE 5.16.0-rc4+ #151 [ 55.503388] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ArchLinux 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [ 55.504777] Workqueue: events bpf_prog_free_deferred [ 55.505563] RIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x184/0x1d0 [ 55.509140] RSP: 0018:ffff88800560fcf0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 55.509977] RAX: fffffbfff802548b RBX: fffffbfff802548c RCX: ffffffff9337b6ba [ 55.511096] RDX: fffffbfff802548c RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffffc012a458 [ 55.512143] RBP: fffffbfff802548b R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffffffc012a45b [ 55.513228] R10: fffffbfff802548b R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888001b5f598 [ 55.514332] R13: ffff888004f49ac8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888092449400 [ 55.515418] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888092400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 55.516705] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 55.517560] CR2: fffffbfff802548b CR3: 0000000007c10006 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 [ 55.518672] PKRU: 55555554 [ 55.519022] Call Trace: [ 55.519483] <TASK> [ 55.519884] module_put.part.0+0x2a/0x180 [ 55.520642] bpf_prog_free_deferred+0x129/0x2e0 [ 55.521478] process_one_work+0x4fa/0x9e0 [ 55.522122] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x100/0x100 [ 55.522878] ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x60/0x60 [ 55.523551] worker_thread+0x2eb/0x700 [ 55.524176] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd8/0xf0 [ 55.524853] ? process_one_work+0x9e0/0x9e0 [ 55.525544] kthread+0x23a/0x270 [ 55.526088] ? set_kthread_struct+0x80/0x80 [ 55.526798] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 55.527413] </TASK> [ 55.527813] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [last unloaded: bpf_testmod] [ 55.530846] CR2: fffffbfff802548b [ 55.531341] ---[ end trace 1af41803c054ad6d ]--- [ 55.532136] RIP: 0010:kasan_check_range+0x184/0x1d0 [ 55.535887] RSP: 0018:ffff88800560fcf0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 55.536711] RAX: fffffbfff802548b RBX: fffffbfff802548c RCX: ffffffff9337b6ba [ 55.537821] RDX: fffffbfff802548c RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffffc012a458 [ 55.538899] RBP: fffffbfff802548b R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffffffc012a45b [ 55.539928] R10: fffffbfff802548b R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888001b5f598 [ 55.541021] R13: ffff888004f49ac8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888092449400 [ 55.542108] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888092400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 55.543260]CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 55.544136] CR2: fffffbfff802548b CR3: 0000000007c10006 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 [ 55.545317] PKRU: 55555554 [ 55.545671] note: kworker/0:2[83] exited with preempt_count 1 Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220114163953.1455836-11-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-01-14 22:09:53 +05:30
if (bpf_fentry_test1(0) < 0)
return -EINVAL;
return sysfs_create_bin_file(kernel_kobj, &bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file);
}
static void bpf_testmod_exit(void)
{
return sysfs_remove_bin_file(kernel_kobj, &bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file);
}
module_init(bpf_testmod_init);
module_exit(bpf_testmod_exit);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Andrii Nakryiko");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("BPF selftests module");
MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");