linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_dummy.c

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
#include "bpf_legacy.h"

SEC("tc")
int entry(struct __sk_buff *skb)
{
	return 1;
}

char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
selftests/bpf: Add testcases for tailcall hierarchy fixing Add some test cases to confirm the tailcall hierarchy issue has been fixed. On x64, the selftests result is: cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf && ./test_progs -t tailcalls 327/18 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_1:OK 327/19 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fentry:OK 327/20 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fexit:OK 327/21 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fentry_fexit:OK 327/22 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fentry_entry:OK 327/23 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_2:OK 327/24 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_3:OK 327 tailcalls:OK Summary: 1/24 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED On arm64, the selftests result is: cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf && ./test_progs -t tailcalls 327/18 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_1:OK 327/19 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fentry:OK 327/20 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fexit:OK 327/21 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fentry_fexit:OK 327/22 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fentry_entry:OK 327/23 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_2:OK 327/24 tailcalls/tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_3:OK 327 tailcalls:OK Summary: 1/24 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240714123902.32305-4-hffilwlqm@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> 2024-07-14 20:39:02 +08:00			`// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0`
			`#include <linux/bpf.h>`
			`#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>`
			`#include "bpf_legacy.h"`

			`SEC("tc")`
			`int entry(struct __sk_buff *skb)`
			`{`
			`return 1;`
			`}`

			`char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";`