linux/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c

323 lines
8 KiB
C
Raw Permalink Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
// Expose an I2C passthrough to the ChromeOS EC.
//
// Copyright (C) 2013 Google, Inc.
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
#include <linux/acpi.h>
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/i2c.h>
mfd / platform: cros_ec: Reorganize platform and mfd includes There is a bit of mess between cros-ec mfd includes and platform includes. For example, we have a linux/mfd/cros_ec.h include that exports the interface implemented in platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c. Or we have a linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h file that is non related to the multifunction device (in the sense that is not exporting any function of the mfd device). This causes crossed includes between mfd and platform/chrome subsystems and makes the code difficult to read, apart from creating 'curious' situations where a platform/chrome driver includes a linux/mfd/cros_ec.h file just to get the exported functions that are implemented in another platform/chrome driver. In order to have a better separation on what the cros-ec multifunction driver does and what the cros-ec core provides move and rework the affected includes doing: - Move cros_ec_commands.h to include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h - Get rid of the parts that are implemented in the platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c driver from include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h to a new file include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h - Update all the drivers with the new includes, so - Drivers that only need to know about the protocol include - linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h - linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h - Drivers that need to know about the cros-ec mfd device also include - linux/mfd/cros_ec.h Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org> Series changes: 3 - Fix dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'struct cros_ec_dev' (lkp) Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2019-09-02 11:53:05 +02:00
#include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h>
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#define I2C_MAX_RETRIES 3
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
/**
* struct ec_i2c_device - Driver data for I2C tunnel
*
* @dev: Device node
* @adap: I2C adapter
* @ec: Pointer to EC device
* @remote_bus: The EC bus number we tunnel to on the other side.
* @request_buf: Buffer for transmitting data; we expect most transfers to fit.
* @response_buf: Buffer for receiving data; we expect most transfers to fit.
*/
struct ec_i2c_device {
struct device *dev;
struct i2c_adapter adap;
struct cros_ec_device *ec;
u16 remote_bus;
u8 request_buf[256];
u8 response_buf[256];
};
/**
* ec_i2c_count_message - Count bytes needed for ec_i2c_construct_message
*
* @i2c_msgs: The i2c messages to read
* @num: The number of i2c messages.
*
* Returns the number of bytes the messages will take up.
*/
static int ec_i2c_count_message(const struct i2c_msg i2c_msgs[], int num)
{
int i;
int size;
size = sizeof(struct ec_params_i2c_passthru);
size += num * sizeof(struct ec_params_i2c_passthru_msg);
for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
if (!(i2c_msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD))
size += i2c_msgs[i].len;
return size;
}
/**
* ec_i2c_construct_message - construct a message to go to the EC
*
* This function effectively stuffs the standard i2c_msg format of Linux into
* a format that the EC understands.
*
* @buf: The buffer to fill. We assume that the buffer is big enough.
* @i2c_msgs: The i2c messages to read.
* @num: The number of i2c messages.
* @bus_num: The remote bus number we want to talk to.
*
* Returns 0 or a negative error number.
*/
static int ec_i2c_construct_message(u8 *buf, const struct i2c_msg i2c_msgs[],
int num, u16 bus_num)
{
struct ec_params_i2c_passthru *params;
u8 *out_data;
int i;
out_data = buf + sizeof(struct ec_params_i2c_passthru) +
num * sizeof(struct ec_params_i2c_passthru_msg);
params = (struct ec_params_i2c_passthru *)buf;
params->port = bus_num;
params->num_msgs = num;
for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
const struct i2c_msg *i2c_msg = &i2c_msgs[i];
struct ec_params_i2c_passthru_msg *msg = &params->msg[i];
msg->len = i2c_msg->len;
msg->addr_flags = i2c_msg->addr;
if (i2c_msg->flags & I2C_M_TEN)
return -EINVAL;
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
if (i2c_msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
msg->addr_flags |= EC_I2C_FLAG_READ;
} else {
memcpy(out_data, i2c_msg->buf, msg->len);
out_data += msg->len;
}
}
return 0;
}
/**
* ec_i2c_count_response - Count bytes needed for ec_i2c_parse_response
*
* @i2c_msgs: The i2c messages to fill up.
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
* @num: The number of i2c messages expected.
*
* Returns the number of response bytes expeced.
*/
static int ec_i2c_count_response(struct i2c_msg i2c_msgs[], int num)
{
int size;
int i;
size = sizeof(struct ec_response_i2c_passthru);
for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
if (i2c_msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD)
size += i2c_msgs[i].len;
return size;
}
/**
* ec_i2c_parse_response - Parse a response from the EC
*
* We'll take the EC's response and copy it back into msgs.
*
* @buf: The buffer to parse.
* @i2c_msgs: The i2c messages to fill up.
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
* @num: The number of i2c messages; will be modified to include the actual
* number received.
*
* Returns 0 or a negative error number.
*/
static int ec_i2c_parse_response(const u8 *buf, struct i2c_msg i2c_msgs[],
int *num)
{
const struct ec_response_i2c_passthru *resp;
const u8 *in_data;
int i;
in_data = buf + sizeof(struct ec_response_i2c_passthru);
resp = (const struct ec_response_i2c_passthru *)buf;
if (resp->i2c_status & EC_I2C_STATUS_TIMEOUT)
return -ETIMEDOUT;
else if (resp->i2c_status & EC_I2C_STATUS_NAK)
return -ENXIO;
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
else if (resp->i2c_status & EC_I2C_STATUS_ERROR)
return -EIO;
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
/* Other side could send us back fewer messages, but not more */
if (resp->num_msgs > *num)
return -EPROTO;
*num = resp->num_msgs;
for (i = 0; i < *num; i++) {
struct i2c_msg *i2c_msg = &i2c_msgs[i];
if (i2c_msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD) {
memcpy(i2c_msg->buf, in_data, i2c_msg->len);
in_data += i2c_msg->len;
}
}
return 0;
}
static int ec_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg i2c_msgs[],
int num)
{
struct ec_i2c_device *bus = adap->algo_data;
struct device *dev = bus->dev;
const u16 bus_num = bus->remote_bus;
int request_len;
int response_len;
int alloc_size;
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
int result;
struct cros_ec_command *msg;
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
request_len = ec_i2c_count_message(i2c_msgs, num);
if (request_len < 0) {
dev_warn(dev, "Error constructing message %d\n", request_len);
return request_len;
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
}
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
response_len = ec_i2c_count_response(i2c_msgs, num);
if (response_len < 0) {
/* Unexpected; no errors should come when NULL response */
dev_warn(dev, "Error preparing response %d\n", response_len);
return response_len;
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
}
alloc_size = max(request_len, response_len);
msg = kmalloc(sizeof(*msg) + alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!msg)
return -ENOMEM;
result = ec_i2c_construct_message(msg->data, i2c_msgs, num, bus_num);
if (result) {
dev_err(dev, "Error constructing EC i2c message %d\n", result);
goto exit;
}
msg->version = 0;
msg->command = EC_CMD_I2C_PASSTHRU;
msg->outsize = request_len;
msg->insize = response_len;
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
result = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(bus->ec, msg);
if (result < 0) {
dev_err(dev, "Error transferring EC i2c message %d\n", result);
goto exit;
}
result = ec_i2c_parse_response(msg->data, i2c_msgs, &num);
if (result < 0)
goto exit;
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
/* Indicate success by saying how many messages were sent */
result = num;
exit:
kfree(msg);
return result;
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
}
static u32 ec_i2c_functionality(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
{
return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL;
}
static const struct i2c_algorithm ec_i2c_algorithm = {
.xfer = ec_i2c_xfer,
.functionality = ec_i2c_functionality,
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
};
static int ec_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct cros_ec_device *ec = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct ec_i2c_device *bus = NULL;
u32 remote_bus;
int err;
i2c: cros-ec-tunnel: defer probe if parent EC is not present When i2c-cros-ec-tunnel and the EC driver are built-in, the EC parent device will not be found, leading to NULL pointer dereference. That can also be reproduced by unbinding the controller driver and then loading i2c-cros-ec-tunnel module (or binding the device). [ 271.991245] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000058 [ 271.998215] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 272.003351] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 272.008485] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 272.011022] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 272.015207] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 3859 Comm: insmod Tainted: G S 6.15.0-rc1-00004-g44722359ed83 #30 PREEMPT(full) 3c7fb39a552e7d949de2ad921a7d6588d3a4fdc5 [ 272.030312] Tainted: [S]=CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC [ 272.034233] Hardware name: HP Berknip/Berknip, BIOS Google_Berknip.13434.356.0 05/17/2021 [ 272.042400] RIP: 0010:ec_i2c_probe+0x2b/0x1c0 [i2c_cros_ec_tunnel] [ 272.048577] Code: 1f 44 00 00 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 48 83 ec 10 65 48 8b 05 06 a0 6c e7 48 89 44 24 08 4c 8d 7f 10 48 8b 47 50 4c 8b 60 78 <49> 83 7c 24 58 00 0f 84 2f 01 00 00 48 89 fb be 30 06 00 00 4c 9 [ 272.067317] RSP: 0018:ffffa32082a03940 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 272.072541] RAX: ffff969580b6a810 RBX: ffff969580b68c10 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 272.079672] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000282 RDI: ffff969580b68c00 [ 272.086804] RBP: 00000000fffffdfb R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 272.093936] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffffc0600000 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 272.101067] R13: ffffffffa666fbb8 R14: ffffffffc05b5528 R15: ffff969580b68c10 [ 272.108198] FS: 00007b930906fc40(0000) GS:ffff969603149000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 272.116282] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 272.122024] CR2: 0000000000000058 CR3: 000000012631c000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 [ 272.129155] Call Trace: [ 272.131606] <TASK> [ 272.133709] ? acpi_dev_pm_attach+0xdd/0x110 [ 272.137985] platform_probe+0x69/0xa0 [ 272.141652] really_probe+0x152/0x310 [ 272.145318] __driver_probe_device+0x77/0x110 [ 272.149678] driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x190 [ 272.153864] __driver_attach+0x10b/0x1e0 [ 272.157790] ? driver_attach+0x20/0x20 [ 272.161542] bus_for_each_dev+0x107/0x150 [ 272.165553] bus_add_driver+0x15d/0x270 [ 272.169392] driver_register+0x65/0x110 [ 272.173232] ? cleanup_module+0xa80/0xa80 [i2c_cros_ec_tunnel 3a00532f3f4af4a9eade753f86b0f8dd4e4e5698] [ 272.182617] do_one_initcall+0x110/0x350 [ 272.186543] ? security_kernfs_init_security+0x49/0xd0 [ 272.191682] ? __kernfs_new_node+0x1b9/0x240 [ 272.195954] ? security_kernfs_init_security+0x49/0xd0 [ 272.201093] ? __kernfs_new_node+0x1b9/0x240 [ 272.205365] ? kernfs_link_sibling+0x105/0x130 [ 272.209810] ? kernfs_next_descendant_post+0x1c/0xa0 [ 272.214773] ? kernfs_activate+0x57/0x70 [ 272.218699] ? kernfs_add_one+0x118/0x160 [ 272.222710] ? __kernfs_create_file+0x71/0xa0 [ 272.227069] ? sysfs_add_bin_file_mode_ns+0xd6/0x110 [ 272.232033] ? internal_create_group+0x453/0x4a0 [ 272.236651] ? __vunmap_range_noflush+0x214/0x2d0 [ 272.241355] ? __free_frozen_pages+0x1dc/0x420 [ 272.245799] ? free_vmap_area_noflush+0x10a/0x1c0 [ 272.250505] ? load_module+0x1509/0x16f0 [ 272.254431] do_init_module+0x60/0x230 [ 272.258181] __se_sys_finit_module+0x27a/0x370 [ 272.262627] do_syscall_64+0x6a/0xf0 [ 272.266206] ? do_syscall_64+0x76/0xf0 [ 272.269956] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x79/0x90 [ 272.274836] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x55/0x5d [ 272.279887] RIP: 0033:0x7b9309168d39 [ 272.283466] Code: 5b 41 5c 5d c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d af 40 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 8 [ 272.302210] RSP: 002b:00007fff50f1a288 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [ 272.309774] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000058bf9b50f6d0 RCX: 00007b9309168d39 [ 272.316905] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000058bf6c103a77 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 272.324036] RBP: 00007fff50f1a2e0 R08: 00007fff50f19218 R09: 0000000021ec4150 [ 272.331166] R10: 000058bf9b50f7f0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 272.338296] R13: 00000000fffffffe R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000058bf6c103a77 [ 272.345428] </TASK> [ 272.347617] Modules linked in: i2c_cros_ec_tunnel(+) [ 272.364585] gsmi: Log Shutdown Reason 0x03 Returning -EPROBE_DEFER will allow the device to be bound once the controller is bound, in the case of built-in drivers. Fixes: 9d230c9e4f4e ("i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver") Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.16+ Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250407-null-ec-parent-v1-1-f7dda62d3110@igalia.com
2025-04-07 17:33:34 -03:00
if (!ec)
return dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, "couldn't find parent EC device\n");
if (!ec->cmd_xfer) {
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
dev_err(dev, "Missing sendrecv\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
bus = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*bus), GFP_KERNEL);
if (bus == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
err = device_property_read_u32(dev, "google,remote-bus", &remote_bus);
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
if (err) {
dev_err(dev, "Couldn't read remote-bus property\n");
return err;
}
bus->remote_bus = remote_bus;
bus->ec = ec;
bus->dev = dev;
bus->adap.owner = THIS_MODULE;
strscpy(bus->adap.name, "cros-ec-i2c-tunnel", sizeof(bus->adap.name));
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
bus->adap.algo = &ec_i2c_algorithm;
bus->adap.algo_data = bus;
bus->adap.dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
bus->adap.dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
bus->adap.retries = I2C_MAX_RETRIES;
ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&bus->adap.dev, ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev));
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
err = i2c_add_adapter(&bus->adap);
if (err)
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
return err;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bus);
return err;
}
i2c: Convert to platform remove callback returning void The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@foss.st.com> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Acked-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de> Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> Acked-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Asmaa Mnebhi <asnaa@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> Reviewed-by: Chris Pringle <chris.pringle@phabrix.com> Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> Reviewed-by: Tali Perry <tali.perry@nuvoton.com> Reviewed-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
2023-05-08 22:51:38 +02:00
static void ec_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
{
struct ec_i2c_device *bus = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
i2c_del_adapter(&bus->adap);
}
static const struct of_device_id cros_ec_i2c_of_match[] __maybe_unused = {
{ .compatible = "google,cros-ec-i2c-tunnel" },
{},
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cros_ec_i2c_of_match);
static const struct acpi_device_id cros_ec_i2c_tunnel_acpi_id[] __maybe_unused = {
{ "GOOG0012", 0 },
{ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, cros_ec_i2c_tunnel_acpi_id);
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
static struct platform_driver ec_i2c_tunnel_driver = {
.probe = ec_i2c_probe,
.remove = ec_i2c_remove,
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
.driver = {
.name = "cros-ec-i2c-tunnel",
.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(cros_ec_i2c_tunnel_acpi_id),
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(cros_ec_i2c_of_match),
i2c: ChromeOS EC tunnel driver On ARM Chromebooks we have a few devices that are accessed by both the AP (the main "Application Processor") and the EC (the Embedded Controller). These are: * The battery (sbs-battery). * The power management unit tps65090. On the original Samsung ARM Chromebook these devices were on an I2C bus that was shared between the AP and the EC and arbitrated using some extranal GPIOs (see i2c-arb-gpio-challenge). The original arbitration scheme worked well enough but had some downsides: * It was nonstandard (not using standard I2C multimaster) * It only worked if the EC-AP communication was I2C * It was relatively hard to debug problems (hard to tell if i2c issues were caused by the EC, the AP, or some device on the bus). On the HP Chromebook 11 the design was changed to: * The AP/EC comms were still i2c, but the battery/tps65090 were no longer on the bus used for AP/EC communication. The battery was exposed to the AP through a limited i2c tunnel and tps65090 was exposed to the AP through a custom Linux driver. On the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2 the scheme is changed yet again, now: * The AP/EC comms are now using SPI for faster speeds. * The EC's i2c bus is exposed to the AP through a full i2c tunnel. The upstream "tegra124-venice2" uses the same scheme as the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2, though it has a different set of components on the other side of the bus. This driver supports the scheme used by the Samsung ARM Chromebook 2. Future patches to this driver could add support for the battery tunnel on the HP Chromebook 11 (and perhaps could even be used to access tps65090 on the HP Chromebook 11 instead of using a special driver, but I haven't researched that enough). Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
2014-04-30 10:44:09 -07:00
},
};
module_platform_driver(ec_i2c_tunnel_driver);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("EC I2C tunnel driver");
MODULE_ALIAS("platform:cros-ec-i2c-tunnel");