linux/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c

376 lines
8.8 KiB
C
Raw Permalink Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* Copyright (C) 2013 Red Hat
* Author: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
*/
#include "msm_gpu.h"
#include "msm_gpu_trace.h"
#include <linux/devfreq.h>
#include <linux/devfreq_cooling.h>
#include <linux/math64.h>
#include <linux/units.h>
/*
* Power Management:
*/
static int msm_devfreq_target(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq,
u32 flags)
{
struct msm_gpu *gpu = dev_to_gpu(dev);
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
/*
* Note that devfreq_recommended_opp() can modify the freq
* to something that actually is in the opp table:
*/
opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(dev, freq, flags);
if (IS_ERR(opp))
return PTR_ERR(opp);
trace_msm_gpu_freq_change(dev_pm_opp_get_freq(opp));
/*
* If the GPU is idle, devfreq is not aware, so just stash
* the new target freq (to use when we return to active)
*/
if (df->idle_freq) {
df->idle_freq = *freq;
dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
return 0;
}
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
if (gpu->funcs->gpu_set_freq) {
mutex_lock(&df->lock);
gpu->funcs->gpu_set_freq(gpu, opp, df->suspended);
mutex_unlock(&df->lock);
} else {
dev_pm_opp_set_rate(dev, *freq);
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
}
dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
return 0;
}
static unsigned long get_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
{
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
/*
* If the GPU is idle, use the shadow/saved freq to avoid
* confusing devfreq (which is unaware that we are switching
* to lowest freq until the device is active again)
*/
if (df->idle_freq)
return df->idle_freq;
if (gpu->funcs->gpu_get_freq)
return gpu->funcs->gpu_get_freq(gpu);
return clk_get_rate(gpu->core_clk);
}
static int msm_devfreq_get_dev_status(struct device *dev,
struct devfreq_dev_status *status)
{
struct msm_gpu *gpu = dev_to_gpu(dev);
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
u64 busy_cycles, busy_time;
unsigned long sample_rate;
ktime_t time;
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
mutex_lock(&df->lock);
status->current_frequency = get_freq(gpu);
time = ktime_get();
status->total_time = ktime_us_delta(time, df->time);
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
df->time = time;
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
if (df->suspended) {
mutex_unlock(&df->lock);
status->busy_time = 0;
return 0;
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
}
busy_cycles = gpu->funcs->gpu_busy(gpu, &sample_rate);
busy_time = busy_cycles - df->busy_cycles;
df->busy_cycles = busy_cycles;
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
mutex_unlock(&df->lock);
busy_time *= USEC_PER_SEC;
busy_time = div64_ul(busy_time, sample_rate);
if (WARN_ON(busy_time > ~0LU))
busy_time = ~0LU;
status->busy_time = busy_time;
return 0;
}
static int msm_devfreq_get_cur_freq(struct device *dev, unsigned long *freq)
{
*freq = get_freq(dev_to_gpu(dev));
return 0;
}
static struct devfreq_dev_profile msm_devfreq_profile = {
drm/msm: Devfreq tuning This adds a few things to try and make frequency scaling better match the workload: 1) Longer polling interval to avoid whip-lashing between too-high and too-low frequencies in certain workloads, like mobile games which throttle themselves to 30fps. Previously our polling interval was short enough to let things ramp down to minimum freq in the "off" frame, but long enough to not react quickly enough when rendering started on the next frame, leading to uneven frame times. (Ie. rather than a consistent 33ms it would alternate between 16/33/48ms.) 2) Awareness of when the GPU is active vs idle. Since we know when the GPU is active vs idle, we can clamp the frequency down to the minimum while it is idle. (If it is idle for long enough, then the autosuspend delay will eventually kick in and power down the GPU.) Since devfreq has no knowledge of powered-but-idle, this takes a small bit of trickery to maintain a "fake" frequency while idle. This, combined with the longer polling period allows devfreq to arrive at a reasonable "active" frequency, while still clamping to minimum freq when idle to reduce power draw. 3) Boost. Because simple_ondemand needs to see a certain threshold of busyness to ramp up, we could end up needing multiple polling cycles before it reacts appropriately on interactive workloads (ex. scrolling a web page after reading for some time), on top of the already lengthened polling interval, when we see a idle to active transition after a period of idle time we boost the frequency that we return to. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726144653.2180096-4-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2021-07-26 07:46:50 -07:00
.timer = DEVFREQ_TIMER_DELAYED,
.polling_ms = 50,
.target = msm_devfreq_target,
.get_dev_status = msm_devfreq_get_dev_status,
.get_cur_freq = msm_devfreq_get_cur_freq,
};
static void msm_devfreq_boost_work(struct kthread_work *work);
static void msm_devfreq_idle_work(struct kthread_work *work);
static bool has_devfreq(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
{
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
return !!df->devfreq;
}
void msm_devfreq_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
{
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
struct msm_drm_private *priv = gpu->dev->dev_private;
int ret;
/* We need target support to do devfreq */
if (!gpu->funcs->gpu_busy)
return;
/*
* Setup default values for simple_ondemand governor tuning. We
* want to throttle up at 50% load for the double-buffer case,
* where due to stalling waiting for vblank we could get stuck
* at (for ex) 30fps at 50% utilization.
*/
priv->gpu_devfreq_config.upthreshold = 50;
priv->gpu_devfreq_config.downdifferential = 10;
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
mutex_init(&df->lock);
drm/msm/gpu: Fix crash when throttling GPU immediately during boot There is a small chance that the GPU is already hot during boot. In that case, the call to of_devfreq_cooling_register() will immediately try to apply devfreq cooling, as seen in the following crash: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000014110 pc : a6xx_gpu_busy+0x1c/0x58 [msm] lr : msm_devfreq_get_dev_status+0xbc/0x140 [msm] Call trace: a6xx_gpu_busy+0x1c/0x58 [msm] (P) devfreq_simple_ondemand_func+0x3c/0x150 devfreq_update_target+0x44/0xd8 qos_max_notifier_call+0x30/0x84 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x6c/0xa0 pm_qos_update_target+0xd0/0x110 freq_qos_apply+0x3c/0x74 apply_constraint+0x88/0x148 __dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x7c/0xcc dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x5c devfreq_cooling_set_cur_state+0x98/0xf0 __thermal_cdev_update+0x64/0xb4 thermal_cdev_update+0x4c/0x58 step_wise_manage+0x1f0/0x318 __thermal_zone_device_update+0x278/0x424 __thermal_cooling_device_register+0x2bc/0x308 thermal_of_cooling_device_register+0x10/0x1c of_devfreq_cooling_register_power+0x240/0x2bc of_devfreq_cooling_register+0x14/0x20 msm_devfreq_init+0xc4/0x1a0 [msm] msm_gpu_init+0x304/0x574 [msm] adreno_gpu_init+0x1c4/0x2e0 [msm] a6xx_gpu_init+0x5c8/0x9c8 [msm] adreno_bind+0x2a8/0x33c [msm] ... At this point we haven't initialized the GMU at all yet, so we cannot read the GMU registers inside a6xx_gpu_busy(). A similar issue was fixed before in commit 6694482a70e9 ("drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy"): msm_devfreq_init() does call devfreq_suspend_device(), but unlike msm_devfreq_suspend(), it doesn't set the df->suspended flag accordingly. This means the df->suspended flag does not match the actual devfreq state after initialization and msm_devfreq_get_dev_status() will end up accessing GMU registers, causing the crash. Fix this by setting df->suspended correctly during initialization. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 6694482a70e9 ("drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy") Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/650772/ Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2025-04-29 10:33:56 +02:00
df->suspended = true;
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(&gpu->pdev->dev, &df->boost_freq,
DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY, 0);
if (ret < 0) {
DRM_DEV_ERROR(&gpu->pdev->dev, "Couldn't initialize QoS\n");
return;
}
msm_devfreq_profile.initial_freq = gpu->fast_rate;
/*
* Don't set the freq_table or max_state and let devfreq build the table
* from OPP
* After a deferred probe, these may have be left to non-zero values,
* so set them back to zero before creating the devfreq device
*/
msm_devfreq_profile.freq_table = NULL;
msm_devfreq_profile.max_state = 0;
df->devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(&gpu->pdev->dev,
&msm_devfreq_profile, DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND,
&priv->gpu_devfreq_config);
if (IS_ERR(df->devfreq)) {
DRM_DEV_ERROR(&gpu->pdev->dev, "Couldn't initialize GPU devfreq\n");
dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&df->boost_freq);
df->devfreq = NULL;
return;
}
devfreq_suspend_device(df->devfreq);
gpu->cooling = of_devfreq_cooling_register(gpu->pdev->dev.of_node, df->devfreq);
if (IS_ERR(gpu->cooling)) {
DRM_DEV_ERROR(&gpu->pdev->dev,
"Couldn't register GPU cooling device\n");
gpu->cooling = NULL;
}
msm_hrtimer_work_init(&df->boost_work, gpu->worker, msm_devfreq_boost_work,
CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
msm_hrtimer_work_init(&df->idle_work, gpu->worker, msm_devfreq_idle_work,
CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
}
static void cancel_idle_work(struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df)
{
hrtimer_cancel(&df->idle_work.timer);
kthread_cancel_work_sync(&df->idle_work.work);
}
static void cancel_boost_work(struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df)
{
hrtimer_cancel(&df->boost_work.timer);
kthread_cancel_work_sync(&df->boost_work.work);
}
void msm_devfreq_cleanup(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
{
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
return;
devfreq_cooling_unregister(gpu->cooling);
dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&df->boost_freq);
}
void msm_devfreq_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
{
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
unsigned long sample_rate;
if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
return;
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
mutex_lock(&df->lock);
df->busy_cycles = gpu->funcs->gpu_busy(gpu, &sample_rate);
df->time = ktime_get();
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
df->suspended = false;
mutex_unlock(&df->lock);
devfreq_resume_device(df->devfreq);
}
void msm_devfreq_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
{
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
return;
drm/msm: Avoid unclocked GMU register access in 6xx gpu_busy From testing on sc7180-trogdor devices, reading the GMU registers needs the GMU clocks to be enabled. Those clocks get turned on in a6xx_gmu_resume(). Confusingly enough, that function is called as a result of the runtime_pm of the GPU "struct device", not the GMU "struct device". Unfortunately the current a6xx_gpu_busy() grabs a reference to the GMU's "struct device". The fact that we were grabbing the wrong reference was easily seen to cause crashes that happen if we change the GPU's pm_runtime usage to not use autosuspend. It's also believed to cause some long tail GPU crashes even with autosuspend. We could look at changing it so that we do pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() on the GPU's "struct device", but then we run into a different problem. pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() will return 0 for the GPU's "struct device" the whole time when we're in the "autosuspend delay". That is, when we drop the last reference to the GPU but we're waiting a period before actually suspending then we'll think the GPU is off. One reason that's bad is that if the GPU didn't actually turn off then the cycle counter doesn't lose state and that throws off all of our calculations. Let's change the code to keep track of the suspend state of devfreq. msm_devfreq_suspend() is always called before we actually suspend the GPU and msm_devfreq_resume() after we resume it. This means we can use the suspended state to know if we're powered or not. NOTE: one might wonder when exactly our status function is called when devfreq is supposed to be disabled. The stack crawl I captured was: msm_devfreq_get_dev_status devfreq_simple_ondemand_func devfreq_update_target qos_notifier_call qos_max_notifier_call blocking_notifier_call_chain pm_qos_update_target freq_qos_apply apply_constraint __dev_pm_qos_update_request dev_pm_qos_update_request msm_devfreq_idle_work Fixes: eadf79286a4b ("drm/msm: Check for powered down HW in the devfreq callbacks") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/489124/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220610124639.v4.1.Ie846c5352bc307ee4248d7cab998ab3016b85d06@changeid Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2022-06-10 12:47:31 -07:00
mutex_lock(&df->lock);
df->suspended = true;
mutex_unlock(&df->lock);
devfreq_suspend_device(df->devfreq);
cancel_idle_work(df);
cancel_boost_work(df);
}
drm/msm: Devfreq tuning This adds a few things to try and make frequency scaling better match the workload: 1) Longer polling interval to avoid whip-lashing between too-high and too-low frequencies in certain workloads, like mobile games which throttle themselves to 30fps. Previously our polling interval was short enough to let things ramp down to minimum freq in the "off" frame, but long enough to not react quickly enough when rendering started on the next frame, leading to uneven frame times. (Ie. rather than a consistent 33ms it would alternate between 16/33/48ms.) 2) Awareness of when the GPU is active vs idle. Since we know when the GPU is active vs idle, we can clamp the frequency down to the minimum while it is idle. (If it is idle for long enough, then the autosuspend delay will eventually kick in and power down the GPU.) Since devfreq has no knowledge of powered-but-idle, this takes a small bit of trickery to maintain a "fake" frequency while idle. This, combined with the longer polling period allows devfreq to arrive at a reasonable "active" frequency, while still clamping to minimum freq when idle to reduce power draw. 3) Boost. Because simple_ondemand needs to see a certain threshold of busyness to ramp up, we could end up needing multiple polling cycles before it reacts appropriately on interactive workloads (ex. scrolling a web page after reading for some time), on top of the already lengthened polling interval, when we see a idle to active transition after a period of idle time we boost the frequency that we return to. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726144653.2180096-4-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2021-07-26 07:46:50 -07:00
static void msm_devfreq_boost_work(struct kthread_work *work)
{
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = container_of(work,
struct msm_gpu_devfreq, boost_work.work);
dev_pm_qos_update_request(&df->boost_freq, 0);
}
void msm_devfreq_boost(struct msm_gpu *gpu, unsigned factor)
{
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
uint64_t freq;
if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
return;
freq = get_freq(gpu);
freq *= factor;
/*
* A nice little trap is that PM QoS operates in terms of KHz,
* while devfreq operates in terms of Hz:
*/
do_div(freq, HZ_PER_KHZ);
dev_pm_qos_update_request(&df->boost_freq, freq);
msm_hrtimer_queue_work(&df->boost_work,
ms_to_ktime(msm_devfreq_profile.polling_ms),
HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
}
drm/msm: Devfreq tuning This adds a few things to try and make frequency scaling better match the workload: 1) Longer polling interval to avoid whip-lashing between too-high and too-low frequencies in certain workloads, like mobile games which throttle themselves to 30fps. Previously our polling interval was short enough to let things ramp down to minimum freq in the "off" frame, but long enough to not react quickly enough when rendering started on the next frame, leading to uneven frame times. (Ie. rather than a consistent 33ms it would alternate between 16/33/48ms.) 2) Awareness of when the GPU is active vs idle. Since we know when the GPU is active vs idle, we can clamp the frequency down to the minimum while it is idle. (If it is idle for long enough, then the autosuspend delay will eventually kick in and power down the GPU.) Since devfreq has no knowledge of powered-but-idle, this takes a small bit of trickery to maintain a "fake" frequency while idle. This, combined with the longer polling period allows devfreq to arrive at a reasonable "active" frequency, while still clamping to minimum freq when idle to reduce power draw. 3) Boost. Because simple_ondemand needs to see a certain threshold of busyness to ramp up, we could end up needing multiple polling cycles before it reacts appropriately on interactive workloads (ex. scrolling a web page after reading for some time), on top of the already lengthened polling interval, when we see a idle to active transition after a period of idle time we boost the frequency that we return to. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726144653.2180096-4-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2021-07-26 07:46:50 -07:00
void msm_devfreq_active(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
{
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
unsigned int idle_time;
unsigned long target_freq;
drm/msm: Devfreq tuning This adds a few things to try and make frequency scaling better match the workload: 1) Longer polling interval to avoid whip-lashing between too-high and too-low frequencies in certain workloads, like mobile games which throttle themselves to 30fps. Previously our polling interval was short enough to let things ramp down to minimum freq in the "off" frame, but long enough to not react quickly enough when rendering started on the next frame, leading to uneven frame times. (Ie. rather than a consistent 33ms it would alternate between 16/33/48ms.) 2) Awareness of when the GPU is active vs idle. Since we know when the GPU is active vs idle, we can clamp the frequency down to the minimum while it is idle. (If it is idle for long enough, then the autosuspend delay will eventually kick in and power down the GPU.) Since devfreq has no knowledge of powered-but-idle, this takes a small bit of trickery to maintain a "fake" frequency while idle. This, combined with the longer polling period allows devfreq to arrive at a reasonable "active" frequency, while still clamping to minimum freq when idle to reduce power draw. 3) Boost. Because simple_ondemand needs to see a certain threshold of busyness to ramp up, we could end up needing multiple polling cycles before it reacts appropriately on interactive workloads (ex. scrolling a web page after reading for some time), on top of the already lengthened polling interval, when we see a idle to active transition after a period of idle time we boost the frequency that we return to. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726144653.2180096-4-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2021-07-26 07:46:50 -07:00
if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
return;
/*
* Cancel any pending transition to idle frequency:
*/
cancel_idle_work(df);
/*
* Hold devfreq lock to synchronize with get_dev_status()/
* target() callbacks
*/
mutex_lock(&df->devfreq->lock);
target_freq = df->idle_freq;
drm/msm: Devfreq tuning This adds a few things to try and make frequency scaling better match the workload: 1) Longer polling interval to avoid whip-lashing between too-high and too-low frequencies in certain workloads, like mobile games which throttle themselves to 30fps. Previously our polling interval was short enough to let things ramp down to minimum freq in the "off" frame, but long enough to not react quickly enough when rendering started on the next frame, leading to uneven frame times. (Ie. rather than a consistent 33ms it would alternate between 16/33/48ms.) 2) Awareness of when the GPU is active vs idle. Since we know when the GPU is active vs idle, we can clamp the frequency down to the minimum while it is idle. (If it is idle for long enough, then the autosuspend delay will eventually kick in and power down the GPU.) Since devfreq has no knowledge of powered-but-idle, this takes a small bit of trickery to maintain a "fake" frequency while idle. This, combined with the longer polling period allows devfreq to arrive at a reasonable "active" frequency, while still clamping to minimum freq when idle to reduce power draw. 3) Boost. Because simple_ondemand needs to see a certain threshold of busyness to ramp up, we could end up needing multiple polling cycles before it reacts appropriately on interactive workloads (ex. scrolling a web page after reading for some time), on top of the already lengthened polling interval, when we see a idle to active transition after a period of idle time we boost the frequency that we return to. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726144653.2180096-4-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2021-07-26 07:46:50 -07:00
idle_time = ktime_to_ms(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), df->idle_time));
df->idle_freq = 0;
/*
* We could have become active again before the idle work had a
* chance to run, in which case the df->idle_freq would have
* still been zero. In this case, no need to change freq.
*/
if (target_freq)
msm_devfreq_target(&gpu->pdev->dev, &target_freq, 0);
mutex_unlock(&df->devfreq->lock);
drm/msm: Devfreq tuning This adds a few things to try and make frequency scaling better match the workload: 1) Longer polling interval to avoid whip-lashing between too-high and too-low frequencies in certain workloads, like mobile games which throttle themselves to 30fps. Previously our polling interval was short enough to let things ramp down to minimum freq in the "off" frame, but long enough to not react quickly enough when rendering started on the next frame, leading to uneven frame times. (Ie. rather than a consistent 33ms it would alternate between 16/33/48ms.) 2) Awareness of when the GPU is active vs idle. Since we know when the GPU is active vs idle, we can clamp the frequency down to the minimum while it is idle. (If it is idle for long enough, then the autosuspend delay will eventually kick in and power down the GPU.) Since devfreq has no knowledge of powered-but-idle, this takes a small bit of trickery to maintain a "fake" frequency while idle. This, combined with the longer polling period allows devfreq to arrive at a reasonable "active" frequency, while still clamping to minimum freq when idle to reduce power draw. 3) Boost. Because simple_ondemand needs to see a certain threshold of busyness to ramp up, we could end up needing multiple polling cycles before it reacts appropriately on interactive workloads (ex. scrolling a web page after reading for some time), on top of the already lengthened polling interval, when we see a idle to active transition after a period of idle time we boost the frequency that we return to. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726144653.2180096-4-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2021-07-26 07:46:50 -07:00
/*
* If we've been idle for a significant fraction of a polling
* interval, then we won't meet the threshold of busyness for
* the governor to ramp up the freq.. so give some boost
*/
if (idle_time > msm_devfreq_profile.polling_ms) {
msm_devfreq_boost(gpu, 2);
drm/msm: Devfreq tuning This adds a few things to try and make frequency scaling better match the workload: 1) Longer polling interval to avoid whip-lashing between too-high and too-low frequencies in certain workloads, like mobile games which throttle themselves to 30fps. Previously our polling interval was short enough to let things ramp down to minimum freq in the "off" frame, but long enough to not react quickly enough when rendering started on the next frame, leading to uneven frame times. (Ie. rather than a consistent 33ms it would alternate between 16/33/48ms.) 2) Awareness of when the GPU is active vs idle. Since we know when the GPU is active vs idle, we can clamp the frequency down to the minimum while it is idle. (If it is idle for long enough, then the autosuspend delay will eventually kick in and power down the GPU.) Since devfreq has no knowledge of powered-but-idle, this takes a small bit of trickery to maintain a "fake" frequency while idle. This, combined with the longer polling period allows devfreq to arrive at a reasonable "active" frequency, while still clamping to minimum freq when idle to reduce power draw. 3) Boost. Because simple_ondemand needs to see a certain threshold of busyness to ramp up, we could end up needing multiple polling cycles before it reacts appropriately on interactive workloads (ex. scrolling a web page after reading for some time), on top of the already lengthened polling interval, when we see a idle to active transition after a period of idle time we boost the frequency that we return to. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726144653.2180096-4-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2021-07-26 07:46:50 -07:00
}
}
static void msm_devfreq_idle_work(struct kthread_work *work)
drm/msm: Devfreq tuning This adds a few things to try and make frequency scaling better match the workload: 1) Longer polling interval to avoid whip-lashing between too-high and too-low frequencies in certain workloads, like mobile games which throttle themselves to 30fps. Previously our polling interval was short enough to let things ramp down to minimum freq in the "off" frame, but long enough to not react quickly enough when rendering started on the next frame, leading to uneven frame times. (Ie. rather than a consistent 33ms it would alternate between 16/33/48ms.) 2) Awareness of when the GPU is active vs idle. Since we know when the GPU is active vs idle, we can clamp the frequency down to the minimum while it is idle. (If it is idle for long enough, then the autosuspend delay will eventually kick in and power down the GPU.) Since devfreq has no knowledge of powered-but-idle, this takes a small bit of trickery to maintain a "fake" frequency while idle. This, combined with the longer polling period allows devfreq to arrive at a reasonable "active" frequency, while still clamping to minimum freq when idle to reduce power draw. 3) Boost. Because simple_ondemand needs to see a certain threshold of busyness to ramp up, we could end up needing multiple polling cycles before it reacts appropriately on interactive workloads (ex. scrolling a web page after reading for some time), on top of the already lengthened polling interval, when we see a idle to active transition after a period of idle time we boost the frequency that we return to. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726144653.2180096-4-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2021-07-26 07:46:50 -07:00
{
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = container_of(work,
struct msm_gpu_devfreq, idle_work.work);
struct msm_gpu *gpu = container_of(df, struct msm_gpu, devfreq);
struct msm_drm_private *priv = gpu->dev->dev_private;
unsigned long idle_freq, target_freq = 0;
drm/msm: Devfreq tuning This adds a few things to try and make frequency scaling better match the workload: 1) Longer polling interval to avoid whip-lashing between too-high and too-low frequencies in certain workloads, like mobile games which throttle themselves to 30fps. Previously our polling interval was short enough to let things ramp down to minimum freq in the "off" frame, but long enough to not react quickly enough when rendering started on the next frame, leading to uneven frame times. (Ie. rather than a consistent 33ms it would alternate between 16/33/48ms.) 2) Awareness of when the GPU is active vs idle. Since we know when the GPU is active vs idle, we can clamp the frequency down to the minimum while it is idle. (If it is idle for long enough, then the autosuspend delay will eventually kick in and power down the GPU.) Since devfreq has no knowledge of powered-but-idle, this takes a small bit of trickery to maintain a "fake" frequency while idle. This, combined with the longer polling period allows devfreq to arrive at a reasonable "active" frequency, while still clamping to minimum freq when idle to reduce power draw. 3) Boost. Because simple_ondemand needs to see a certain threshold of busyness to ramp up, we could end up needing multiple polling cycles before it reacts appropriately on interactive workloads (ex. scrolling a web page after reading for some time), on top of the already lengthened polling interval, when we see a idle to active transition after a period of idle time we boost the frequency that we return to. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726144653.2180096-4-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2021-07-26 07:46:50 -07:00
/*
* Hold devfreq lock to synchronize with get_dev_status()/
* target() callbacks
*/
mutex_lock(&df->devfreq->lock);
idle_freq = get_freq(gpu);
drm/msm: Devfreq tuning This adds a few things to try and make frequency scaling better match the workload: 1) Longer polling interval to avoid whip-lashing between too-high and too-low frequencies in certain workloads, like mobile games which throttle themselves to 30fps. Previously our polling interval was short enough to let things ramp down to minimum freq in the "off" frame, but long enough to not react quickly enough when rendering started on the next frame, leading to uneven frame times. (Ie. rather than a consistent 33ms it would alternate between 16/33/48ms.) 2) Awareness of when the GPU is active vs idle. Since we know when the GPU is active vs idle, we can clamp the frequency down to the minimum while it is idle. (If it is idle for long enough, then the autosuspend delay will eventually kick in and power down the GPU.) Since devfreq has no knowledge of powered-but-idle, this takes a small bit of trickery to maintain a "fake" frequency while idle. This, combined with the longer polling period allows devfreq to arrive at a reasonable "active" frequency, while still clamping to minimum freq when idle to reduce power draw. 3) Boost. Because simple_ondemand needs to see a certain threshold of busyness to ramp up, we could end up needing multiple polling cycles before it reacts appropriately on interactive workloads (ex. scrolling a web page after reading for some time), on top of the already lengthened polling interval, when we see a idle to active transition after a period of idle time we boost the frequency that we return to. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726144653.2180096-4-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2021-07-26 07:46:50 -07:00
if (priv->gpu_clamp_to_idle)
msm_devfreq_target(&gpu->pdev->dev, &target_freq, 0);
df->idle_time = ktime_get();
df->idle_freq = idle_freq;
mutex_unlock(&df->devfreq->lock);
drm/msm: Devfreq tuning This adds a few things to try and make frequency scaling better match the workload: 1) Longer polling interval to avoid whip-lashing between too-high and too-low frequencies in certain workloads, like mobile games which throttle themselves to 30fps. Previously our polling interval was short enough to let things ramp down to minimum freq in the "off" frame, but long enough to not react quickly enough when rendering started on the next frame, leading to uneven frame times. (Ie. rather than a consistent 33ms it would alternate between 16/33/48ms.) 2) Awareness of when the GPU is active vs idle. Since we know when the GPU is active vs idle, we can clamp the frequency down to the minimum while it is idle. (If it is idle for long enough, then the autosuspend delay will eventually kick in and power down the GPU.) Since devfreq has no knowledge of powered-but-idle, this takes a small bit of trickery to maintain a "fake" frequency while idle. This, combined with the longer polling period allows devfreq to arrive at a reasonable "active" frequency, while still clamping to minimum freq when idle to reduce power draw. 3) Boost. Because simple_ondemand needs to see a certain threshold of busyness to ramp up, we could end up needing multiple polling cycles before it reacts appropriately on interactive workloads (ex. scrolling a web page after reading for some time), on top of the already lengthened polling interval, when we see a idle to active transition after a period of idle time we boost the frequency that we return to. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726144653.2180096-4-robdclark@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
2021-07-26 07:46:50 -07:00
}
void msm_devfreq_idle(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
{
struct msm_gpu_devfreq *df = &gpu->devfreq;
if (!has_devfreq(gpu))
return;
msm_hrtimer_queue_work(&df->idle_work, ms_to_ktime(1),
HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
}