linux/tools/perf/util/disasm_bpf.h

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only

#ifndef __PERF_DISASM_BPF_H
#define __PERF_DISASM_BPF_H

struct symbol;
struct annotate_args;

int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol *sym, struct annotate_args *args);
int symbol__disassemble_bpf_image(struct symbol *sym, struct annotate_args *args);

#endif /* __PERF_DISASM_BPF_H */
perf bpf: Move BPF disassembly routines to separate file to avoid clash with capstone bpf headers There is a clash of the libbpf and capstone libraries, that ends up with: In file included from /usr/include/capstone/capstone.h:325, from util/disasm.c:1513: /usr/include/capstone/bpf.h:94:14: error: ‘bpf_insn’ defined as wrong kind of tag 94 \| typedef enum bpf_insn { So far we're just trying to avoid this by not having both headers included in the same .c or .h file, do it one more time by moving the BPF diassembly routines from util/disasm.c to util/disasm_bpf.c. This is only being hit when building with BUILD_NONDISTRO=1, i.e. building with binutils-devel, that isn't the in the default build due to a licencing clash. We need to reimplement what is now isolated in util/disasm_bpf.c using some other library to have BPF annotation feature that now only is available with BUILD_NONDISTRO=1. Fixes: 6d17edc113de1e21 ("perf annotate: Use libcapstone to disassemble") Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZqpUSKPxMwaQKORr@x1 Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> 2024-07-31 11:58:56 -03:00			`// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only`

			`#ifndef __PERF_DISASM_BPF_H`
			`#define __PERF_DISASM_BPF_H`

			`struct symbol;`
			`struct annotate_args;`

			`int symbol__disassemble_bpf(struct symbol sym, struct annotate_args args);`
			`int symbol__disassemble_bpf_image(struct symbol sym, struct annotate_args args);`

			`#endif /* __PERF_DISASM_BPF_H */`