2021-11-15 22:58:42 +00:00
|
|
|
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
|
bpftool-link
|
|
|
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
tool for inspection and simple manipulation of eBPF links
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Manual section: 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
bpftool: Update doc (use susbtitutions) and test_bpftool_synctypes.py
test_bpftool_synctypes.py helps detecting inconsistencies in bpftool
between the different list of types and options scattered in the
sources, the documentation, and the bash completion. For options that
apply to all bpftool commands, the script had a hardcoded list of
values, and would use them to check whether the man pages are
up-to-date. When writing the script, it felt acceptable to have this
list in order to avoid to open and parse bpftool's main.h every time,
and because the list of global options in bpftool doesn't change so
often.
However, this is prone to omissions, and we recently added a new
-l|--legacy option which was described in common_options.rst, but not
listed in the options summary of each manual page. The script did not
complain, because it keeps comparing the hardcoded list to the (now)
outdated list in the header file.
To address the issue, this commit brings the following changes:
- Options that are common to all bpftool commands (--json, --pretty, and
--debug) are moved to a dedicated file, and used in the definition of
a RST substitution. This substitution is used in the sources of all
the man pages.
- This list of common options is updated, with the addition of the new
-l|--legacy option.
- The script test_bpftool_synctypes.py is updated to compare:
- Options specific to a command, found in C files, for the
interactive help messages, with the same specific options from the
relevant man page for that command.
- Common options, checked just once: the list in main.h is
compared with the new list in substitutions.rst.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211115225844.33943-3-quentin@isovalent.com
2021-11-15 22:58:43 +00:00
|
|
|
.. include:: substitutions.rst
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
SYNOPSIS
|
|
|
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
|
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
**bpftool** [*OPTIONS*] **link** *COMMAND*
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
*OPTIONS* := { |COMMON_OPTIONS| | { **-f** | **--bpffs** } | { **-n** | **--nomount** } }
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
*COMMANDS* := { **show** | **list** | **pin** | **help** }
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LINK COMMANDS
|
|
|
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
|
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
| **bpftool** **link { show | list }** [*LINK*]
|
|
|
|
|
| **bpftool** **link pin** *LINK* *FILE*
|
|
|
|
|
| **bpftool** **link detach** *LINK*
|
|
|
|
|
| **bpftool** **link help**
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
| *LINK* := { **id** *LINK_ID* | **pinned** *FILE* }
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
|
|
===========
|
2024-03-31 21:03:45 +01:00
|
|
|
bpftool link { show | list } [*LINK*]
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
Show information about active links. If *LINK* is specified show
|
|
|
|
|
information only about given link, otherwise list all links currently
|
|
|
|
|
active on the system.
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
Output will start with link ID followed by link type and zero or more named
|
|
|
|
|
attributes, some of which depend on type of link.
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
Since Linux 5.8 bpftool is able to discover information about processes
|
|
|
|
|
that hold open file descriptors (FDs) against BPF links. On such kernels
|
|
|
|
|
bpftool will automatically emit this information as well.
|
2020-06-19 16:17:03 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2024-03-31 21:03:45 +01:00
|
|
|
bpftool link pin *LINK* *FILE*
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
Pin link *LINK* as *FILE*.
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
Note: *FILE* must be located in *bpffs* mount. It must not contain a dot
|
|
|
|
|
character ('.'), which is reserved for future extensions of *bpffs*.
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2024-03-31 21:03:45 +01:00
|
|
|
bpftool link detach *LINK*
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
Force-detach link *LINK*. BPF link and its underlying BPF program will stay
|
|
|
|
|
valid, but they will be detached from the respective BPF hook and BPF link
|
|
|
|
|
will transition into a defunct state until last open file descriptor for
|
|
|
|
|
that link is closed.
|
2020-07-31 11:28:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2024-03-31 21:03:45 +01:00
|
|
|
bpftool link help
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
Print short help message.
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPTIONS
|
|
|
|
|
=======
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
.. include:: common_options.rst
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
-f, --bpffs
|
|
|
|
|
When showing BPF links, show file names of pinned links.
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
bpftool: Use simpler indentation in source rST for documentation
The rST manual pages for bpftool would use a mix of tabs and spaces for
indentation. While this is the norm in C code, this is rather unusual
for rST documents, and over time we've seen many contributors use a
wrong level of indentation for documentation update.
Let's fix bpftool's indentation in docs once and for all:
- Let's use spaces, that are more common in rST files.
- Remove one level of indentation for the synopsis, the command
description, and the "see also" section. As a result, all sections
start with the same indentation level in the generated man page.
- Rewrap the paragraphs after the changes.
There is no content change in this patch, only indentation and
rewrapping changes. The wrapping in the generated source files for the
manual pages is changed, but the pages displayed with "man" remain the
same, apart from the adjusted indentation level on relevant sections.
[ Quentin: rebased on bpf-next, removed indent level for command
description and options, updated synopsis, command summary, and "see
also" sections. ]
Signed-off-by: Rameez Rehman <rameezrehman408@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240331200346.29118-2-qmo@kernel.org
2024-03-31 21:03:44 +01:00
|
|
|
-n, --nomount
|
|
|
|
|
Do not automatically attempt to mount any virtual file system (such as
|
|
|
|
|
tracefs or BPF virtual file system) when necessary.
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXAMPLES
|
|
|
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
|
**# bpftool link show**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10: cgroup prog 25
|
|
|
|
|
cgroup_id 614 attach_type egress
|
2020-06-19 16:17:03 -07:00
|
|
|
pids test_progs(223)
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**# bpftool --json --pretty link show**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[{
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "cgroup",
|
|
|
|
|
"prog_id": 25,
|
|
|
|
|
"cgroup_id": 614,
|
2020-06-19 16:17:03 -07:00
|
|
|
"attach_type": "egress",
|
|
|
|
|
"pids": [{
|
|
|
|
|
"pid": 223,
|
|
|
|
|
"comm": "test_progs"
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
]
|
2020-04-28 17:16:13 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| **# bpftool link pin id 10 /sys/fs/bpf/link**
|
|
|
|
|
| **# ls -l /sys/fs/bpf/**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Apr 23 21:39 link
|