linux/kernel/trace/rv/monitors/wip/wip.c

89 lines
2 KiB
C
Raw Permalink Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/rv.h>
#include <rv/instrumentation.h>
#include <rv/da_monitor.h>
#define MODULE_NAME "wip"
#include <trace/events/rv.h>
rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor The wakeup in preemptive (wip) monitor verifies if the wakeup events always take place with preemption disabled: | | v #==================# H preemptive H <+ #==================# | | | | preempt_disable | preempt_enable v | sched_waking +------------------+ | +--------------- | | | | | non_preemptive | | +--------------> | | -+ +------------------+ The wakeup event always takes place with preemption disabled because of the scheduler synchronization. However, because the preempt_count and its trace event are not atomic with regard to interrupts, some inconsistencies might happen. The documentation illustrates one of these cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c98ca678df81115fddc04921b3c79720c836b18f.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2022-07-29 11:38:52 +02:00
#include <trace/events/sched.h>
#include <trace/events/preemptirq.h>
#include "wip.h"
static struct rv_monitor rv_wip;
DECLARE_DA_MON_PER_CPU(wip, unsigned char);
rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor The wakeup in preemptive (wip) monitor verifies if the wakeup events always take place with preemption disabled: | | v #==================# H preemptive H <+ #==================# | | | | preempt_disable | preempt_enable v | sched_waking +------------------+ | +--------------- | | | | | non_preemptive | | +--------------> | | -+ +------------------+ The wakeup event always takes place with preemption disabled because of the scheduler synchronization. However, because the preempt_count and its trace event are not atomic with regard to interrupts, some inconsistencies might happen. The documentation illustrates one of these cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c98ca678df81115fddc04921b3c79720c836b18f.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2022-07-29 11:38:52 +02:00
static void handle_preempt_disable(void *data, unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip)
{
da_handle_event_wip(preempt_disable_wip);
}
rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor The wakeup in preemptive (wip) monitor verifies if the wakeup events always take place with preemption disabled: | | v #==================# H preemptive H <+ #==================# | | | | preempt_disable | preempt_enable v | sched_waking +------------------+ | +--------------- | | | | | non_preemptive | | +--------------> | | -+ +------------------+ The wakeup event always takes place with preemption disabled because of the scheduler synchronization. However, because the preempt_count and its trace event are not atomic with regard to interrupts, some inconsistencies might happen. The documentation illustrates one of these cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c98ca678df81115fddc04921b3c79720c836b18f.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2022-07-29 11:38:52 +02:00
static void handle_preempt_enable(void *data, unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip)
{
rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor The wakeup in preemptive (wip) monitor verifies if the wakeup events always take place with preemption disabled: | | v #==================# H preemptive H <+ #==================# | | | | preempt_disable | preempt_enable v | sched_waking +------------------+ | +--------------- | | | | | non_preemptive | | +--------------> | | -+ +------------------+ The wakeup event always takes place with preemption disabled because of the scheduler synchronization. However, because the preempt_count and its trace event are not atomic with regard to interrupts, some inconsistencies might happen. The documentation illustrates one of these cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c98ca678df81115fddc04921b3c79720c836b18f.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2022-07-29 11:38:52 +02:00
da_handle_start_event_wip(preempt_enable_wip);
}
rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor The wakeup in preemptive (wip) monitor verifies if the wakeup events always take place with preemption disabled: | | v #==================# H preemptive H <+ #==================# | | | | preempt_disable | preempt_enable v | sched_waking +------------------+ | +--------------- | | | | | non_preemptive | | +--------------> | | -+ +------------------+ The wakeup event always takes place with preemption disabled because of the scheduler synchronization. However, because the preempt_count and its trace event are not atomic with regard to interrupts, some inconsistencies might happen. The documentation illustrates one of these cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c98ca678df81115fddc04921b3c79720c836b18f.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2022-07-29 11:38:52 +02:00
static void handle_sched_waking(void *data, struct task_struct *task)
{
da_handle_event_wip(sched_waking_wip);
}
static int enable_wip(void)
{
int retval;
retval = da_monitor_init_wip();
if (retval)
return retval;
rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor The wakeup in preemptive (wip) monitor verifies if the wakeup events always take place with preemption disabled: | | v #==================# H preemptive H <+ #==================# | | | | preempt_disable | preempt_enable v | sched_waking +------------------+ | +--------------- | | | | | non_preemptive | | +--------------> | | -+ +------------------+ The wakeup event always takes place with preemption disabled because of the scheduler synchronization. However, because the preempt_count and its trace event are not atomic with regard to interrupts, some inconsistencies might happen. The documentation illustrates one of these cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c98ca678df81115fddc04921b3c79720c836b18f.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2022-07-29 11:38:52 +02:00
rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", preempt_enable, handle_preempt_enable);
rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", sched_waking, handle_sched_waking);
rv_attach_trace_probe("wip", preempt_disable, handle_preempt_disable);
return 0;
}
static void disable_wip(void)
{
rv_wip.enabled = 0;
rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor The wakeup in preemptive (wip) monitor verifies if the wakeup events always take place with preemption disabled: | | v #==================# H preemptive H <+ #==================# | | | | preempt_disable | preempt_enable v | sched_waking +------------------+ | +--------------- | | | | | non_preemptive | | +--------------> | | -+ +------------------+ The wakeup event always takes place with preemption disabled because of the scheduler synchronization. However, because the preempt_count and its trace event are not atomic with regard to interrupts, some inconsistencies might happen. The documentation illustrates one of these cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c98ca678df81115fddc04921b3c79720c836b18f.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2022-07-29 11:38:52 +02:00
rv_detach_trace_probe("wip", preempt_disable, handle_preempt_disable);
rv_detach_trace_probe("wip", preempt_enable, handle_preempt_enable);
rv_detach_trace_probe("wip", sched_waking, handle_sched_waking);
da_monitor_destroy_wip();
}
static struct rv_monitor rv_wip = {
.name = "wip",
rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor The wakeup in preemptive (wip) monitor verifies if the wakeup events always take place with preemption disabled: | | v #==================# H preemptive H <+ #==================# | | | | preempt_disable | preempt_enable v | sched_waking +------------------+ | +--------------- | | | | | non_preemptive | | +--------------> | | -+ +------------------+ The wakeup event always takes place with preemption disabled because of the scheduler synchronization. However, because the preempt_count and its trace event are not atomic with regard to interrupts, some inconsistencies might happen. The documentation illustrates one of these cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c98ca678df81115fddc04921b3c79720c836b18f.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2022-07-29 11:38:52 +02:00
.description = "wakeup in preemptive per-cpu testing monitor.",
.enable = enable_wip,
.disable = disable_wip,
.reset = da_monitor_reset_all_wip,
.enabled = 0,
};
static int __init register_wip(void)
{
rv_register_monitor(&rv_wip);
return 0;
}
static void __exit unregister_wip(void)
{
rv_unregister_monitor(&rv_wip);
}
module_init(register_wip);
module_exit(unregister_wip);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
rv/monitor: Add the wip monitor The wakeup in preemptive (wip) monitor verifies if the wakeup events always take place with preemption disabled: | | v #==================# H preemptive H <+ #==================# | | | | preempt_disable | preempt_enable v | sched_waking +------------------+ | +--------------- | | | | | non_preemptive | | +--------------> | | -+ +------------------+ The wakeup event always takes place with preemption disabled because of the scheduler synchronization. However, because the preempt_count and its trace event are not atomic with regard to interrupts, some inconsistencies might happen. The documentation illustrates one of these cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/c98ca678df81115fddc04921b3c79720c836b18f.1659052063.git.bristot@kernel.org Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2022-07-29 11:38:52 +02:00
MODULE_AUTHOR("Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("wip: wakeup in preemptive - per-cpu sample monitor.");